RE: Toniq-R

Tuesday 18th June 2002

Toniq-R

Huddersfield Students show us their modern 7 concept


Author
Discussion

mattjbatch

Original Poster:

1,502 posts

278 months

Tuesday 18th June 2002
quotequote all
I like it. Very contemporary. Wheels arches required for the SVA would probably ruin the looks though.

Roadrunner

2,690 posts

274 months

Tuesday 18th June 2002
quotequote all
A step on from the current crop of lookalikes. A clip on carbon hardtop would make a handy accessory, especially in this country. I like the lights, makes a change from a couple of search lights hanging off a bathtub.

marki

15,763 posts

277 months

Tuesday 18th June 2002
quotequote all
It looks like a bath tubb with wheels stuck on the side ,, for gods sake we have the "7" if we want this sort of thing .

PetrolTed

34,443 posts

310 months

Tuesday 18th June 2002
quotequote all
Yes, but it would be good to see a modern interpretation that was a bit smoother. I'm not sure this is it, but it does at least raise some interesting possibilities.

stig

11,822 posts

291 months

Tuesday 18th June 2002
quotequote all
It's poo.

Fine if you drive where there's absolutely no standing water or dirt, but as soon as you turn a corner you're gonna cop a face full of road crap.

Plonkers.

mattjbatch

Original Poster:

1,502 posts

278 months

Tuesday 18th June 2002
quotequote all
Its obviously not in road spec. Its just a concept to show off their ideas. To be road legal it would need cycle wings, windsrceen etc.

gee_fin

119 posts

290 months

Tuesday 18th June 2002
quotequote all
Rancid. And I'd love to see it pass an SVA!

________________________________________________________
graeme finlayson | tyre warmer | fluke motorsport
gee_fin@hotmail.com | www.fluke-motorsport.co.uk

Barbados Rally Carnival Experience

Twin Turbo

5,544 posts

273 months

Tuesday 18th June 2002
quotequote all
I like it!

marki

15,763 posts

277 months

Tuesday 18th June 2002
quotequote all
About as un imaginative as is possible , i know what your saying Ted but this is not it IMO

dans

1,137 posts

291 months

Tuesday 18th June 2002
quotequote all
looks great, I'd guess budgetary constraints have hampered some of the more imaginative original ideas. It might be good to see how production changes like mudguards and legally acceptable lighting affect the design, but on the whole it looks like a good effort, Id certainly rather buy this than one of the seven clones.

Roadrunner

2,690 posts

274 months

Tuesday 18th June 2002
quotequote all
It has to be better than the dozen 7 replicas out there all looking identical. It just needs a few practical bits integrated. Would be good to have a bit of thought with a smooth integrated roof, rather than a bodged tent effort.

Mark Benson

7,804 posts

276 months

Tuesday 18th June 2002
quotequote all
I like the idea of bringing the '7' idea up to date a bit, I can also see why the designers and Westfield had 'differences of opinion' about it....

The front 3/4 view makes it look like it was made out of an old tin bath.

Not very imaginative really (was this the design we voted for back in December?).

rotax man

22 posts

282 months

Tuesday 18th June 2002
quotequote all
Uuurrrrghhh!

Retro rairly sems to work (morgan aero 8 anyone) either stick with what you've got or properly modernise it - i.e build a new car.

When will these charcoal weilding art types realise that aerodynmaics not only produces the fastest cars but also the best looking ones? I hope they choke on their own post modernism!

dangerous B

44 posts

269 months

Tuesday 18th June 2002
quotequote all
What did they do with the rest of their tea break?
Brian!!!!!!

caribeiro

58 posts

279 months

Tuesday 18th June 2002
quotequote all
I like it, isn't original but, in mine opinion, it can be a very sucessful re-edition of the 7.


Esprit

6,370 posts

290 months

Wednesday 19th June 2002
quotequote all
Interesting.... it has both its good and its bad pointd. Not a bad overall design, showing one avenue of thought on the old '7' idea. First thing I'd do is lose those ruddy side vents. Fake vents look naff and '70s and I know thayr'e not real vents because the last thing that '7' driversneed is more cockpit ventilation. Of course this would leave it looking VERY slab-sided but perhaps the body or wheelarches could be sculpted in to break up the line a bit. Perhaps lowering the front by a slight making the side-runners along the top of the bonnet follow more the bonet profile. This would help make a more aggressive stance andwould break up the "bathtub" look of the current design. From the rear 3/4 however its looking pretty food. Would love to see it with a Screeen, guards and a carbonfibre hardtop, as i think this design would lend itself to it more than the existing 7s. Perhaps the rollover bars could look more integrated as well?

james

1,362 posts

291 months

Wednesday 19th June 2002
quotequote all
I like it. Putting the fuel tank in the centre of the car (rather than hanging out the back waiting to be ruptured in a rear end impact) is a good idea.

I also like the styling. It's a lot smoother and more modern looking, without completely losing sight of the original.

Not sure about the lip round the front of the car though.

James

Mr Fix it

473 posts

275 months

Wednesday 19th June 2002
quotequote all
It would be good to be able to buy an updated looking 7, but although this looks good, it is not futuristic enough. Being student designers they should not have such a constraint on them as ones who are in the industry. A bit more radical looking please. I'm getting fed up with all the cars looking so similar today....people can do better.

Dave (design engineer)

jamie

133 posts

291 months

Wednesday 19th June 2002
quotequote all
How long did it take to come up with this? (not long I would imagine) Looks like any other seven style concept that has been booted around recently. No concessions in road use at all.
I know for a fact that it rains almost constantly in Huddersfield – so where is the roof?

MajorClanger

749 posts

277 months

Wednesday 19th June 2002
quotequote all
Was the result based on:



Looks more like a project in designing something they could build easily rather than state of the art design.

The comment that "...Colin Williams having worked at TVR in their design department", was he responsible for the backend of the Tamora by any chance?

MC