2008 Mazda MX-5 Niseko (NC)
TOPIC CLOSED
TOPIC CLOSED
Author
Discussion

d304us

Original Poster:

6 posts

1 month

Johnian56

10 posts

12 months

Monday 15th December 2025
quotequote all
May I ask why there is a six year gap between 2017 and 2023 with no service history?

Johnian56

10 posts

12 months

Monday 15th December 2025
quotequote all
Just seen no mileage recorded on the 2023 service . If Mazda serviced the car surely they recorded the mileage . Also noted on the photographs the drivers seat looks rather worn for such a low mileage car. Also seems very odd it is recorded as category n by insurers .

d304us

Original Poster:

6 posts

1 month

Monday 15th December 2025
quotequote all
Hello, owner here.

Thanks for your comments.

Regarding the service history, I am trying to check that with my Dad who owned the car then. Once the car had finished with the service plan at Mazda, he switched to have the car serviced at a small local garage, which carried out the 2023 service.

I am certain my Dad did have the car serviced annually, however given the period covers the pandemic, it may be that one or two years were not recorded, but I am looking into it.

The MOT test record (which I have for every year) states that the car had done 11,273 miles on 13 September 2017, and 12,351 miles on 21 September 2023, so an annual service throughout that period was somewhat luxurious in any event.

The mileage is absolutely genuine, and the drivers seat is absolutely not worn. I think I had perhaps just got out of it when the photo was taken!!

As for the Cat N, my Dad's previous car, which also had the personalised plate, was indeed a category n. However, that incident predated the first registration of this car, and that can be clearly evidenced, as required. As pistonheads have mentioned, they are liaising with HPI to sort out the record.



Edited by d304us on Monday 15th December 16:23

Gez1953

1 posts

1 month

Tuesday 16th December 2025
quotequote all
Hello, I felt the need to post a comment regarding the Mazda MX5 my son is offering for auction. I am the original owner of the car and have had the car from new. In order that there should be no doubt in the mind of anyone bidding on the car let me state the following.
1. The full ownership of the car was transferred to my son last year.
2. The car carries a personal registration and has done since original registration. M15 GWA was however also on my previous mk2 MX5 which unfortunately due to an unmarked diesel spillage was involved in an accident and was written off.
3. This mk3 MX 5 Niseko is absolutely straight. The mileage is categorically correct. The dealer service and mot record fully support this. The car has never been in any form of accident.
4. The car was main dealership serviced for the greater part of its life but as the annual mileage diminished to lower and lower levels I switched servicing to my local well established village garage. During the covid period the car remained inside its dry well ventilated garage under its dust sheet.

So if you choose to bid on this genuinely sound and stunning example of one of the best drivers cars please do so in full confidence. It’s an absolute belter.

Johnian56

10 posts

12 months

Thursday 18th December 2025
quotequote all
May I ask you to advise when the cat.n is removed as I would only bid if this is not recorded against the car.thank you.

Johnian56

10 posts

12 months

Tuesday 30th December 2025
quotequote all
Ia the car still recorded as a category N accident damaged vehicle? Thank you.

d304us

Original Poster:

6 posts

1 month

Tuesday 30th December 2025
quotequote all
Hi,

I don’t believe the record has been corrected at the HPI yet although Pistonheads have been chasing. Clearly at this time of year replies are slow. I suspect there is a decent chance that the record will not be corrected before the auction ends.

For absolute clarity, the vehicle is NOT accident damaged. It has never even had a scratch in the garage.

The category N relates to the private number plate only and it can clearly be shown that the car is not accident damaged by reference to the VIN. There has never been an issue obtaining insurance and this issue has never come up in 17 years of ownership. All of this can be easily evidenced.

Mikey Custard

7 posts

62 months

Wednesday 31st December 2025
quotequote all
Re the Cat N, would this simply not disappear if the original plate was replaced and the personal plate removed as the vendors states that the 'N' relates to a previous car which held that registration? Or is it not that simple?

d304us

Original Poster:

6 posts

1 month

Wednesday 31st December 2025
quotequote all
Hi

I believe it’s exactly that simple yes. If I had known prior to the auction I would have removed the private plate.

I have the original sales invoice from when the car was purchased which proves date of registration, and this clearly post dates the information HPI has regarding the category n.

Thanks

John goodyear

3 posts

1 month

Wednesday 31st December 2025
quotequote all
Hi just to clarify things the number plate on the car at the moment (M15GWA) will be sold with the car ?

d304us

Original Poster:

6 posts

1 month

Wednesday 31st December 2025
quotequote all
Hi

Up to the buyer, no issue to include the plate from my side.

Obviously the car needs to reach its reserve to sell in any event.

Thanks

John goodyear

3 posts

1 month

Wednesday 31st December 2025
quotequote all
Great . No cost related with plate M15GWA ?

John goodyear

3 posts

1 month

Wednesday 31st December 2025
quotequote all
Great . No cost related with plate M15GWA ?

d304us

Original Poster:

6 posts

1 month

Wednesday 31st December 2025
quotequote all
Assuming the car makes a price above the reserve I have no issues with the plate staying on it.

OTSOT

1 posts

10 months

Saturday 3rd January
quotequote all
This page clearly displays that there is no reserve on this car, is that not the case?

d304us

Original Poster:

6 posts

1 month

Saturday 3rd January
quotequote all
The reserve has now been met
TOPIC CLOSED
TOPIC CLOSED