More Lotusy than a Lotus Emira!

More Lotusy than a Lotus Emira!

Author
Discussion

Derek182

Original Poster:

166 posts

87 months

Sunday 30th June
quotequote all
One of my customers is a serial Lotus owner of Esprits, Elan, Elise, 2 Evoras and he had a deposit on an Emira I4 which he has cancelled after a recent test drive, he did like it but lost patience with the endless delays and price increases.
This week I took him out in my A110GT and let him have a drive as well, he was very impressed.
To him a Lotus should have great steering, good ride and be small and light - all of which the Alpine does better than the Emira hence him saying it was "more Lotusy than a Lotus Emira!
Plus the Emira being £20k more expensive whereas if Lotus had stuck to their pricing it would have been much closer.

James Elmer

263 posts

222 months

Monday 1st July
quotequote all
Interesting observations.
I’ve been tempted by an Emira. I had a drive in an i4 automatic recently and it went well around Donington, felt good chassis-wise and suspension-wise and the brakes were good. I thought that electric seats were unnecessary and added to the weight. Most of all I found the gearbox to be very slow to respond to requests to change via the paddles - has anyone else found that to be the case?

heisenberger

35 posts

14 months

Monday 1st July
quotequote all
I'm also tempted by Emira. On paper it has all the right ingredients (except lightweightness), looks amazing, and compared to something like cayman, it is cheap and very special car...

Liam22

138 posts

113 months

Monday 1st July
quotequote all
Derek182 said:
To him a Lotus should have great steering, good ride and be small and light - all of which the Alpine does better than the Emira hence him saying it was "more Lotusy than a Lotus Emira!
All true, except for steering.

If there's one thing I'd change about the A110 it would be to improve steering feel. Judging turn-in speed is still a mystery, mostly based on previous corners. A Lotus lets you know through steering feel in the braking zone.

I'm curious how bad it would be to delete the EPAS.

Terminator X

16,331 posts

211 months

Monday 1st July
quotequote all
Liam22 said:
Derek182 said:
To him a Lotus should have great steering, good ride and be small and light - all of which the Alpine does better than the Emira hence him saying it was "more Lotusy than a Lotus Emira!
All true, except for steering.

If there's one thing I'd change about the A110 it would be to improve steering feel. Judging turn-in speed is still a mystery, mostly based on previous corners. A Lotus lets you know through steering feel in the braking zone.

I'm curious how bad it would be to delete the EPAS.
Weird as I don't find that at all.

Re the Lotus, now owned by a Chinese company so imho all the history is gone and not to be relied on.

TX.

bcr5784

7,183 posts

152 months

Monday 1st July
quotequote all
James Elmer said:
Interesting observations.
I’ve been tempted by an Emira. I had a drive in an i4 automatic recently and it went well around Donington, felt good chassis-wise and suspension-wise and the brakes were good. I thought that electric seats were unnecessary and added to the weight. Most of all I found the gearbox to be very slow to respond to requests to change via the paddles - has anyone else found that to be the case?
Petrol Ped said the slow response to a downshift response ruined the I4 for him. So it doesn't seem like a one-off, but odd since I've not seen the same criticism of the A45 S.


Edited by bcr5784 on Monday 1st July 19:02

Derek182

Original Poster:

166 posts

87 months

Monday 1st July
quotequote all
My customer had similar reservations about the gear change in the Emira I4, wasn't a deal breaker for him as he wasn't looking at track use and thought it was ok for the road but did say the Alpine's gear change was far quicker.
I think Lotus had a few problems adapting the Merc engine to mid engine use, it runs lower power in the Emira than the A45, presumably less boost, due to cooling problems maybe? Not sure why the gear change would be worse though, I assume it electrically operated not relying on cables or linkages?
Lotus certainly took a very long time to bring the I4 to market.

Gibbo205

3,572 posts

214 months

Tuesday 2nd July
quotequote all
Hi there

I had a V6 FE manual on order and after my test drive cancelled the order. It felt slow and heavy, had an Exige 410 and 987 Boxster Spyder at time, both of which felt faster than the Emira, I drove Emira in track mode flat out, was not impressed.

The A110S feels faster, lighter and the DCT gearbox is more responsive than the i4 AMG gearbox.

bcr5784

7,183 posts

152 months

Tuesday 2nd July
quotequote all
Gibbo205 said:
Hi there

I had a V6 FE manual on order and after my test drive cancelled the order. It felt slow and heavy, had an Exige 410 and 987 Boxster Spyder at time, both of which felt faster than the Emira, I drove Emira in track mode flat out, was not impressed.

The A110S feels faster, lighter and the DCT gearbox is more responsive than the i4 AMG gearbox.
The Emira does seem to be strangely slow - slower than the Evora by more than you might expect allowing for the increase in weight. In fact it's no quicker through the gears than a base 250bhp A110, and much less torquey in gear - see https://zeperfs.com/en/duel6621-10593.htm

Peter.R

31 posts

66 months

Friday 5th July
quotequote all
I took the Emira I4 for a test drive. lovely car to look at , very easy to drive , good visibility and a nice cabin. However for an 85K car the engine was average at best, the exhaust sound was awful and when i put it into sport it was offensive. The gearbox was completely confused when using the paddles from Auto mode, it took an age to revert back to auto and it changed down through slow corners quite unexpectedly. The car didn't feel at all fast, the Alpine feels far more keen to pile on the speed. For the original price of 65K you could forgive some of these issues but not for 85K.
The whole test drive experience was a bit of a let down with Lotus and the dealer falling out and the customer interaction somewhat lacking. Having had a deposit down for several years it all ended a bit flat and i cancelled. TBH had the Emira I4 been 65K i would probably still keep the Alpine.

erics

2,677 posts

218 months

Monday 15th July
quotequote all
Concurring with all views here, test drove the Emira, loved the looks but was sorely disappointed by the experience. Felt heavy on its feet, bouncy on uneven UK roads, engine sound was weird, the supercharger whistle is there all the time and eventually does your head in. Cruising on motorway was a noisy affair.

I ended up buying a A110 gt and then a San Remo, both of which are miles better on all these fronts.

Ryder35

371 posts

192 months

Monday 15th July
quotequote all
erics said:
Concurring with all views here, test drove the Emira, loved the looks but was sorely disappointed by the experience. Felt heavy on its feet, bouncy on uneven UK roads, engine sound was weird, the supercharger whistle is there all the time and eventually does your head in. Cruising on motorway was a noisy affair.

I ended up buying a A110 gt and then a San Remo, both of which are miles better on all these fronts.
How do you like the San Remo? Very tempted because of the S interior and standard suspension. Also the carbon roof! Not seen one in person so not sure on the looks

Terminator X

16,331 posts

211 months

Monday 15th July
quotequote all
Ryder35 said:
erics said:
Concurring with all views here, test drove the Emira, loved the looks but was sorely disappointed by the experience. Felt heavy on its feet, bouncy on uneven UK roads, engine sound was weird, the supercharger whistle is there all the time and eventually does your head in. Cruising on motorway was a noisy affair.

I ended up buying a A110 gt and then a San Remo, both of which are miles better on all these fronts.
How do you like the San Remo? Very tempted because of the S interior and standard suspension. Also the carbon roof! Not seen one in person so not sure on the looks
I drove one at an Alpine day, it was very good. Love the looks too.

TX.

Ryder35

371 posts

192 months

Monday 15th July
quotequote all
Irritatingly the insurance seems to be about 3 times as much as a standard S

Murphys

68 posts

26 months

Monday 15th July
quotequote all
Yep I also drove one on the alpine day and loved it. Not sure I’d part with mine for one, the looks are a little bit marmite IMO

Whaleblue

381 posts

95 months

Monday 15th July
quotequote all
San Remo is the only SE that ever appealed. 300HP plus standard suspension and bucket seats, and I really love the looks. Perfect A110, but I’m very happy with my base car.

s111dpc

1,407 posts

236 months

Monday 15th July
quotequote all
I had a San Remo on loan for a weekend and rather liked the combination of the sporty interior and power along with the softer suspension. The red carbon roof was a bit marmite but I liked it.

erics

2,677 posts

218 months

Tuesday 16th July
quotequote all
It is inherently the same as the GT really except for these fabulous seats, all alcantara interior and the specific looks.

I adored my abyss blue gt and not driven the SR73 enough yet, i am ashamed to say it still has barely 120 miles on the clock!

Only swapped because I fancied something a little extra special.

I already had the life110 geo done.

My only gripe is that if does not have the upgraded audio system with the subwoofer under the passenger seat. Just the regular Focal.

It is the same as the Tour de Corse too which if I am honest is my favorite of all the A110's.

Ryder35 said:
How do you like the San Remo? Very tempted because of the S interior and standard suspension. Also the carbon roof! Not seen one in person so not sure on the looks