Toyota C-HR - advice please!

Toyota C-HR - advice please!

Author
Discussion

Tony B2

Original Poster:

657 posts

182 months

Friday 29th December 2023
quotequote all
Ok - dinosaur petrolhead needs some advice!

My sister-in-law is looking at buying a 2020 Toyota C-hr (moving from a manual BMW 123d).

I know nothing about them, or the particular one in the frame, apart from the fact that it has CVT.

My last experience of CVT was that (a) it was definitely an “acquired taste”and (b) they were somewhat unreliable.

Not sure whether this iteration has pre-set ratios, or it is the real continuously variable type.

Any and all advice gratefully received!

(Re-posted in the correct forum)

bennno

12,716 posts

276 months

Friday 29th December 2023
quotequote all

Hugely reliable, apparently 2.0 a lot better than 1.8

I went in a couple as Ubers in Singapore and was impressed, wanted one.

Then we got lent one on an extended basis and in our part of the country which is limited traffic, dual carriageways and lots of hills the cvt drone did my head in.

Tony B2

Original Poster:

657 posts

182 months

Friday 29th December 2023
quotequote all
bennno said:
Hugely reliable, apparently 2.0 a lot better than 1.8

I went in a couple as Ubers in Singapore and was impressed, wanted one.

Then we got lent one on an extended basis and in our part of the country which is limited traffic, dual carriageways and lots of hills the cvt drone did my head in.
The CVT comment is what I was concerned about, as she (my S-in-Law) will have plenty of long journeys to do.

Easternlight

3,506 posts

151 months

Friday 29th December 2023
quotequote all
Not tried the CH R but recently tried a Lexus NX with the CVT.
Definitely a very different drive train but it does everything that any "ordinary" (non petrolhead) driver would want. And you don't hear any horror stories about them.

Yahonza

2,123 posts

37 months

Friday 29th December 2023
quotequote all
Toyota hybrids use an epicyclic/planetary gearbox.. Very economical but unexciting to drive and a bit noisy when pushed. I wouldn't choose this for doing a lot of long distance driving and got rid of something similar for that reason.

Squadrone Rosso

2,913 posts

154 months

Friday 29th December 2023
quotequote all
We ran a launch edition 1.8 for three years from new. Really nice but a little small for our needs (two dogs).

The 2.0 has a planetary CVT so no belts. But either is a decent enough & very efficient.

They tried talking us in to a 2L. Way quicker than the 1.8 yet more economical but the 12v battery gets moved in to the boot from under the bonnet so boot space further impacted.

Got a RAV4 instead & love it.

volvos60s60

575 posts

221 months

Monday 8th January
quotequote all
I am 3 months into ownership of a 2021 2.0 hybrid (CVT). As a daily driver, it is very good, lively enough, quiet in normal driving, incredibly economical (bizzarely more economical in suburban traffic than on the open road as I believe the battery has more influence on the elect/petrol balance at lower/crawling speeds). I fact I had one journey at night through the 20mph coma that is London, & it actually hit 70 mpg over the course of 20 miles. Never seen less than 50 mpg on any journey.

Downsides are that when hitting the gas to overtake it is noisier, but not unpleasantly so, once up to speed it settles back down to low noise levels. Steering is light & has no real feel, so if pressing on through the twisities it's hard to be sure how close you are to the limit of adhesion. Also, at 6' tall I find the seats lacking in under thigh support & they cannot be tilted as in say a Volvo.

Overall, it's no sports car that's for sure, but it is a very pleasant commuter car.


maz8062

2,608 posts

222 months

Sunday 1st September
quotequote all
Holy thread resurrection but I just had to put my thoughts on paper having just spent 1 week and 300 miles with one of these cars on the island of Menorca in Spain.

What a rubbish car this is. It is so confusing to understand what the controls do. Cruise control, it doesn’t work in “B” and it is not intuitive at all. I used it once. The CVT gearbox, not great. The steering, numb, lifeless. The infotainment system, confusing.

What did I like? The fuel consumption, €30 for 300 miles. I’ll take that.

I then noticed a Yaris Cross parked behind it where I was staying. They both looked identical.

Note, I’m coming from an I3s and Porsche 911 997 but I’ve driven lots and lots of cars. I wouldn’t recommend this car.

davidif

116 posts

178 months

Sunday 1st September
quotequote all
Maybe need to consider handling back your driving licence (failing eyesight) if you think that a CHR looks anything like a Yaris Cross!!