M400 in EVO

Author
Discussion

stuh

Original Poster:

2,557 posts

280 months

Tuesday 4th May 2004
quotequote all
Included in a group test with 360CS. 911GT3RS and Exige S2. Not the best article ever, a bit lightweight by EVO's normally excellent standards.

Also a Macca F1 v Porsche GT shootout. Oh to drive a Macca once in my life

Quite like the look of that Mosler 900 as well..............

Marlon

735 posts

265 months

Tuesday 4th May 2004
quotequote all
Yup, the Mosler certainly is The Daddy!

So, what was the conclusion of the group test? Reading between the lines (no pun) are you saying that the whole article was a bit skimpy, or that the M400 didn't get a great reception?

Cheers.

C3 GTK

896 posts

262 months

Tuesday 4th May 2004
quotequote all
Does anyone know the waiting time for M400 delivery?

obes

3,298 posts

251 months

Tuesday 4th May 2004
quotequote all
C3 GTK said:
Does anyone know the waiting time for M400 delivery?


You're not considering a 'kit car' are you Gary !!?

AL001

831 posts

277 months

Tuesday 4th May 2004
quotequote all
The Noble got 4.5 stars, the others 5.

Pity they didn;t bother to track the cars also to see how they fared seeing as that's what they have been honed from their standard models for.

Stuart

11,636 posts

258 months

Tuesday 4th May 2004
quotequote all
AL001 said:
The Noble got 4.5 stars, the others 5.

Pity they didn;t bother to track the cars also to see how they fared seeing as that's what they have been honed from their standard models for.


Full drive story by Chris Harris will be in Autocar tomorrow. Without giving the game away, one of the things he's said is "If you're a potential Noble convert, try it soon. If you already own an M12, don't. The upgrade will be inevitable."

When you read the article you'll also notice that we decided to try the car without one of its signature features. It was interesting to say the least.

AL001

831 posts

277 months

Tuesday 4th May 2004
quotequote all
Did you do a back-to-back with a GTO 3R *on track* for a proper assessment of track improvements?

m12_nathan

5,138 posts

266 months

Tuesday 4th May 2004
quotequote all
You took the stickers off

I assume you tried it without the ARB?

Stuart

11,636 posts

258 months

Tuesday 4th May 2004
quotequote all
AL001 said:
Did you do a back-to-back with a GTO 3R *on track* for a proper assessment of track improvements?


No, we didn't have time to do that. Chris has spent a lot of time in both the 3 and 3R though so the article is very much aimed at how the car offers improvements over the existing car on track. We also did our best to see what the actual top speed was, but I'm afraid you'll have to check out how we did in your local WHSmith's/public library for that bit. If I told you that we had the car at Bruntingthorpe then it might give you an indication as to what we were able to do in the car.

m12_nathan

5,138 posts

266 months

Tuesday 4th May 2004
quotequote all
"the article is very much aimed at how the car offers improvements over the existing car on track"

The point Evo have missed by the sounds of it!

kj-r

1,877 posts

258 months

Tuesday 4th May 2004
quotequote all
Evo did make some valid points though, I agree that some styling (especially the stuck on air scoops) leave a bit to be desired and as for the cabin gauges what good is a oil temp/pressure gauge down at the bottom of the consule,surely Noble could have fitted a proper stack or similar system.
I'm sure it drives very well and good to hear the driving position and gear selection are improved.

Kevin

>> Edited by kj-r on Tuesday 4th May 20:23

>> Edited by kj-r on Tuesday 4th May 20:24

c3 gtk

896 posts

262 months

Tuesday 4th May 2004
quotequote all
obes said:

C3 GTK said:
Does anyone know the waiting time for M400 delivery?



You're not considering a 'kit car' are you Gary !!?




I already own a "kitcar"

Im always looking for the next "toy"

Stuart

11,636 posts

258 months

Tuesday 4th May 2004
quotequote all
m12_nathan said:
"the article is very much aimed at how the car offers improvements over the existing car on track"

The point Evo have missed by the sounds of it!


Don't know, haven't read it. Don't want this to seem like I'm trying to do down Evo by the way - its a bloody good mag and I'm sure they've done a typically good job with the car.

stuh

Original Poster:

2,557 posts

280 months

Tuesday 4th May 2004
quotequote all
stuart_forrest said:

AL001 said:
Did you do a back-to-back with a GTO 3R *on track* for a proper assessment of track improvements?



No, we didn't have time to do that. Chris has spent a lot of time in both the 3 and 3R though so the article is very much aimed at how the car offers improvements over the existing car on track. We also did our best to see what the actual top speed was, but I'm afraid you'll have to check out how we did in your local WHSmith's/public library for that bit. If I told you that we had the car at Bruntingthorpe then it might give you an indication as to what we were able to do in the car.


Ahh! Sans Wing

I'f often wondered how much difference removing the mirrors would make. They generate a considerable amount of wind noise above 80mph so i would imagine must add considerably to the cd figure ?

actech

693 posts

274 months

Tuesday 4th May 2004
quotequote all
kj-r said:
...as for the cabin gauges what good is a oil temp/pressure gauge down at the bottom of the consule,surely Noble could have fitted a proper stack or similar system.

The production version will have the oil temp/pressure gauge next to the turbo boost gauge on the central dash board.

Anthony.

goodlife

1,852 posts

266 months

Tuesday 4th May 2004
quotequote all
stuart_forrest said:
We also did our best to see what the actual top speed was, but I'm afraid you'll have to check out how we did in your local WHSmith's/public library for that bit. If I told you that we had the car at Bruntingthorpe then it might give you an indication as to what we were able to do in the car.
At Brunters, top speed is notoriously difficult to achieve as there is a predominant head-wind.

On one trip we managed just 157 wingless and 153 winged, but on another occasion without wind (ahem), the same 3R managed 160 with the wing on.

I know Justin achieved 163 winged with less bhp.

All these speeds were 'official' (timing trap and GPS) rather than speedo indicated.

My guess is that the M400 with 22% more horses than the 3R, going wingless with no wind, it should get between 170-175 at Brunters.

DanH

12,287 posts

267 months

Tuesday 4th May 2004
quotequote all
kj-r said:
Evo did make some valid points though, I agree that some styling (especially the stuck on air scoops) leave a bit to be desired and as for the cabin gauges what good is a oil temp/pressure gauge down at the bottom of the consule,surely Noble could have fitted a proper stack or similar system.
I'm sure it drives very well and good to hear the driving position and gear selection are improved.


I agree that a proper stack would definitely be a step forward, likely it would likely require a whole dashboard redesign I'd think? Ideally they could then move the stereo to the centre and make sure there is enough clearance above it for a fold out sat nav screen.

Stuart

11,636 posts

258 months

Tuesday 4th May 2004
quotequote all
goodlife said:

My guess is that the M400 with 22% more horses than the 3R, going wingless with no wind, it should get between 170-175 at Brunters.


Not a bad guess at all.

goodlife

1,852 posts

266 months

Tuesday 4th May 2004
quotequote all
Was there much wind during your test Stuart?

m12_nathan

5,138 posts

266 months

Tuesday 4th May 2004
quotequote all
You can fit a stack in the existing rev counter place if you want...

www.stackltd.com/st700.html#700street

You can option it up to be almost as good as the full screen ones.