Front Number Plate
Discussion
I don't think it is illegal - The factory did it to my car. The badge has been moved to front i.e. behind where the number plate used to be and plate is as low down as it will go with going over the edge so to speak.
Can't think why this should affect reasale value - it's a matter of opinion - as for respraying well you just get stone chip around where the plate was - doesn't really make a difference.
The majour thing is the the cooling is greatly improved.
Can't think why this should affect reasale value - it's a matter of opinion - as for respraying well you just get stone chip around where the plate was - doesn't really make a difference.
The majour thing is the the cooling is greatly improved.
guysh said:
I don't think it is illegal - The factory did it to my car. The badge has been moved to front i.e. behind where the number plate used to be and plate is as low down as it will go with going over the edge so to speak.
Can't think why this should affect reasale value - it's a matter of opinion - as for respraying well you just get stone chip around where the plate was - doesn't really make a difference.
The majour thing is the the cooling is greatly improved.
Agree on the cooling comment but it was a dealer who commented on the resale value and need to respray(and they should know!) and it was the factory (no names!) who told me that the plate was "technically illegal (and they should know too)!
I am sure I read somewhere there is only one car that can legally have a stick on number plate, and that's the Jag E-Type.
From the DVLA website
Are stick-on number plates legal?
No, number plates must meet the British Standard requirements and we are not aware of any self-adhesive number plates that are able to meet these requirements.
J
From the DVLA website
Are stick-on number plates legal?
No, number plates must meet the British Standard requirements and we are not aware of any self-adhesive number plates that are able to meet these requirements.
J
The old e-type used these plates but they were illegal and would occasionally get pulled over. As the requirements if anything are getting tighter, I woul dexpect the ones on the Noble to also be illegal. I think the plate has to be vertical and of the correct size.
The re-sale value might be impacted by the lack of a legal plate, and the relevant fixing points as I gues you would take these off as well. But I don't see any other problem, as long as you can peel it back off without causing paint damage. Do they come off the ArmourFend stuff OK?
One of the factory cars has one fitted on top of an Armoutfend type of solution.
>> Edited by buxton on Thursday 23 October 15:51
>> Edited by buxton on Thursday 23 October 15:52
The re-sale value might be impacted by the lack of a legal plate, and the relevant fixing points as I gues you would take these off as well. But I don't see any other problem, as long as you can peel it back off without causing paint damage. Do they come off the ArmourFend stuff OK?
One of the factory cars has one fitted on top of an Armoutfend type of solution.
>> Edited by buxton on Thursday 23 October 15:51
>> Edited by buxton on Thursday 23 October 15:52
The DVLA is correct that no self adhesive plates conform to the 2001 regulations (which are retrospective).
Basically, any car manufactured after 1960something needs to have an acrylic reflective number plate conforming to the relevant BS code (one of the 145 series).
You could get points and a fine, but if you feign ignorance and say the car came with it then you might just get a defect notice (ie. fix it, go to MOT station and pay £15 (I think) then police station.)
Gareth
Basically, any car manufactured after 1960something needs to have an acrylic reflective number plate conforming to the relevant BS code (one of the 145 series).
You could get points and a fine, but if you feign ignorance and say the car came with it then you might just get a defect notice (ie. fix it, go to MOT station and pay £15 (I think) then police station.)
Gareth
Put it on. about 40% samller than normal size, just
the job.
Quite frankly, F**k the law, this country
is so F**ked up with red tape and jobsworth W**kers
making C**ps rule and regs just cause Brussels says so.
There I feel so much better now.
>> Edited by ibroker on Tuesday 28th October 11:02
the job.
Quite frankly, F**k the law, this country
is so F**ked up with red tape and jobsworth W**kers
making C**ps rule and regs just cause Brussels says so.
There I feel so much better now.
>> Edited by ibroker on Tuesday 28th October 11:02
g_attrill said:
The DVLA is correct that no self adhesive plates conform to the 2001 regulations (which are retrospective).
Basically, any car manufactured after 1960something needs to have an acrylic reflective number plate conforming to the relevant BS code (one of the 145 series).
You could get points and a fine, but if you feign ignorance and say the car came with it then you might just get a defect notice (ie. fix it, go to MOT station and pay £15 (I think) then police station.)
Gareth
I've (touch wood) never had any problems with the plate on my 1990 MX5 turbo; this is normal sized, normal spacing and not vertical, but IS reflective and BS145a marked. I got it from a car parts shop in Bath in 1990 - the shop is long gone now though!
It's also got through about 10 MOTs now at various garages without a mention.
Hugo
Gassing Station | Noble | Top of Page | What's New | My Stuff