Who’s buying all the used 1.2 puretech engine cars?

Who’s buying all the used 1.2 puretech engine cars?

Author
Discussion

ACCYSTAN

Original Poster:

1,030 posts

128 months

Was dropping of at Peugeot dealers, mechanic tells me they currently had 7 that’s right SEVEN 1.2 puretechs all needing new engines for one of 2 reasons

- drinking oil due to piston wear
- cam belt snapped

All over 3 years old and out of warranty although one was covered by the used warranty.

Which made me think, the 1.2 puretech is widely used, it was only 2023 models where you could guarantee it has a chain instead of the belt (some models changed over to the chain version of the engine in 2022 but there where still 22 and 72 plates in the UK with the belt set up); who is buying all these vehicles with a known engine failure design?
Especially buying them out of manufacture warranty?

Lovely drive the puretech, it’s a shame like the Ford eco boost it’s made of cheese

Davie

5,011 posts

222 months

Most manufacturers have "known issues" with engines... but not everybody knows or cares. Googling issues on a car is a bit like Googling your health symptoms, you end up down and rabbit hole convinced of the worst. Not every 1.2 Puretech will fail so people probably tend to just get on with it and deal with it if it happens. Can't live live nor base car purchases on a worst case scenario or nobody would buy any cars.

ChocolateFrog

28,584 posts

180 months

The vast majority of motorists couldn't tell you the number of cylinders they've got under the bonnet let alone the engine code or how their cams are driven, that's why.


ACCYSTAN

Original Poster:

1,030 posts

128 months

Fair point, not everyone is a PH enthusiast

Davie

5,011 posts

222 months

I have friends who are either oblivious or simply don't care and there are times when I wish I could be a bit more like that. I think knowing or being around people who do know can be very good, but can also be quite restrictive as there's always somebody out there ready to tell you X, Y or Z will likely go wrong and you really shouldn't buy X, Y or Z either.

My friend, not a single care... he recently bought an older Audi and I went "Oh, are they not bad for X, Y or Z" and he said "And? If it breaks, I'll fix it" and he likes the car, it's what he wanted and so he bought it with minimal regard for what ifs. He very bluntly pointed out that women are prone to breast cancer but that didn't put him off marrying his wife 20 years ago.

The man has a point!





RayDonovan

4,951 posts

222 months

Regular punters have no idea about what a good/bad engine is.

My mate bought a car that has known issues (1.5 PSA diesel) and it promptly shat itself on the A1, needs a whole new engine and the warranty company, dealer and manufacturer want nothing to do with it.

He does 40k PA so you'd think he would have done some research or speak to mates who know...

malks222

1,984 posts

146 months

I have one (well wife does) 1.2 peugeot 308 (2014) and to be honest it’s been a great little car. bought it 5yrs ago, and didn’t know there was a ‘known issue’ with the wet timing belt.

this summer, car started stuttering, threw and engine warning light. turns out it was the timing belt disintegrating and blocked the oil pick up pipe. took it to a local garage, who stripped it down, cleaned it out, new timing belt, plus service for £650. back on the road and all good.

with hindsight would’ve got the belt done at 55k, was a bit of a stressful week when it went wrong, but not the end of the world

Rotary Potato

371 posts

103 months

I think you have to remember that the internet is full of horror stories. No one posts up "my car didn't blow up today". smile

How many 1.2 Puretech engines within a reasonable radius of that dealership are merrily running around having not expired?

I have owned two RX8s with the infamously fragile wankel engine, a Porsche Boxster with the dreaded IMS and RMS problems, and my girlfriend currently drives around propelled by an Ingenium diesel engine. All were relative bargains because of their reputations. If the internet is to be believed, the combined force of their failures should have ripped open a fresh black hole over my driveway! smile Full disclosure ... I got burned on the RX8s. Everything else has been perfectly reliable. You win some, you lose some.

Maybe I'm just a glass-half-full guy, but when people get worked up about a 10% failure rate, my brain immediately goes "so a 9 in 10 chance of getting a good car at a bargain price". biggrin

Most people are ignorant of these reputations. Some people who aren't ignorant chose to take an informed risk. The few who are both informed and risk adverse avoid them. So to answer your question, it's either people ignorant of their reputation, or those who are aware and willing to take an informed risk.

MrGTI6

3,219 posts

137 months

The wet belt is a stupid idea but it's easy to prevent failure by servicing regularly and using the correct oil.

The problem is that the engine is fitted to run-of-the-mill cars bought by those whose idea of servicing a car only extends as far as replacing a set of tyres or brake pads to get it through an MOT.

Mine's on 154k and runs like a dream.

malks222

1,984 posts

146 months

also not helped by peugeot reducing the service interval (now recommend 6yrs/ 60k miles) after so many failures. think originally it was meant to be replaced at 100k!

as mentioned, it’s just a consumable service item that has very dire consequences if ignored/ neglected

Roger Irrelevant

3,112 posts

120 months

Davie said:
Most manufacturers have "known issues" with engines... but not everybody knows or cares. Googling issues on a car is a bit like Googling your health symptoms, you end up down and rabbit hole convinced of the worst.
That's a good analogy. As my current car was by some distance the most expensive I've bought I took it upon myself to do a fair bit of research. According to the internet, amongst other things I'd chew through tyres every 12,000 miles (so roughly every 8/9 months), would struggle to get above 35mpg, would be buying locking mechanisms and window regulators every other week, any suspension components would cost a fortune, any spares at all would cost a fortune, it would drink almost as much oil as it did diesel, the handling would see me slewing off into ditches on a regular basis and the gearbox would st itself soon after 100k miles. The reason I bought it anyway was that every other car I considered was apparently no better in the round. As it turns out none of that has happened so I can only conclude that A) you really do get a doom-laden view of the world from the internet, and B) a lot of such info comes from people that are stupid and can't drive for toffee. So the next time I spend even more on a car I doubt I'll bother doing any such research, I'll just get the one I like.