Cat s or n, would you buy?

Cat s or n, would you buy?

Author
Discussion

Road2Ruin

Original Poster:

5,482 posts

223 months

Wednesday 2nd October
quotequote all
I see a lot of Cat S or N cars available, nowadays. Obviously they are a lot cheaper than similar, non written off vehicles.
Anyone got any experiences, and would you buy one?
Is the insurance on these notably higher?

FilH

749 posts

151 months

Wednesday 2nd October
quotequote all
If its a cheap 2/3k run around with loads of miles , yep. ,who cares..


If say a 16k cat bmw that would be 20k non cat. Then nope. They just seem to be a hard sell, hence offering them cheaper, smaller market when selling. Cant off load them to the we buy anys if you need to.




Road2Ruin

Original Poster:

5,482 posts

223 months

Wednesday 2nd October
quotequote all
FilH said:
If its a cheap 2/3k run around with loads of miles , yep. ,who cares..


If say a 16k cat bmw that would be 20k non cat. Then nope. They just seem to be a hard sell, hence offering them cheaper, smaller market when selling. Cant off load them to the we buy anys if you need to.
Looking at an Audi A1, about £4-5k for the daughter

JQ

6,045 posts

186 months

Wednesday 2nd October
quotequote all
Road2Ruin said:
I see a lot of Cat S or N cars available, nowadays. Obviously they are a lot cheaper than similar, non written off vehicles.
Anyone got any experiences, and would you buy one?
Is the insurance on these notably higher?
Never bought one, but would consider it depending on the damage:

Superficial damage to bodywork - fine if the discount was good enough.
Any damage to wheels, brakes, moving parts, chassis - no chance. You have no idea if the repairs have been carried out to a quality standard and will only likely find out when you really need everything to work.

And I would not buy either one of the above without full photographic evidence of the original damage, there's no way I'd trust someone's word in such circumstances.

However, I am a hypocrite, I've owned several trackday cars which have either been built by me (limited mechanical skills) or strangers (who's qualifications are unknown) and I've happily pushed said cars to the absolute limits.

charltjr

284 posts

16 months

Wednesday 2nd October
quotequote all
I’d want to see pictures of the damage, they can often be found through a car check service like vcheck.

A car with some panel damage is a world away from something that’s been in a major crash, and the cat marker is not a good guide to severity.

0ddball

879 posts

146 months

Wednesday 2nd October
quotequote all
Why not? Here in Bradford (where 90% of cars on FB marketplace are write offs), they've all been repaired to "the highest standard" laugh

Muzzer79

11,060 posts

194 months

Wednesday 2nd October
quotequote all
Road2Ruin said:
FilH said:
If its a cheap 2/3k run around with loads of miles , yep. ,who cares..


If say a 16k cat bmw that would be 20k non cat. Then nope. They just seem to be a hard sell, hence offering them cheaper, smaller market when selling. Cant off load them to the we buy anys if you need to.
Looking at an Audi A1, about £4-5k for the daughter
Depends on who repaired it and what documentation there is of said repair.

Would you want your daughter driving around in a write off that you don't know the standard of repair on?

If it was superficial damage and/or you can get a thorough inspection to give you peace of mind, go for it.

brillomaster

1,396 posts

177 months

Wednesday 2nd October
quotequote all
i'd draw the line at a cat S, but i bought a cat N porsche boxster a few years back. guy seemed genuine enough, was 25% cheaper than an equivalent non cat N car.

it was just for some damage to the front wing and bumper, both of which were easily repaired and repainted such that you couldn't tell they were there.

insurance was no more difficult to get than a non cat N car.

I think i was limited when it came to selling time - think 95% of the target audience was put off by a cat N status. it did eventually sell though.

I wouldnt have another cat N car... purely because of the difficulty come resale time.

Mr Tidy will be along shortly with a photograph of his bumper...

Megaflow

9,919 posts

232 months

Wednesday 2nd October
quotequote all
The old system of Cat C & D, I would never have gone near, just not enough information available to make an informed decision.

The new system of S & N, I would consider and indeed have bought a Cat N car as a track slag, it hadn’t even been repaired. I would not consider a Cat S car though.

Road2Ruin

Original Poster:

5,482 posts

223 months

Wednesday 2nd October
quotequote all
Muzzer79 said:
Road2Ruin said:
FilH said:
If its a cheap 2/3k run around with loads of miles , yep. ,who cares..


If say a 16k cat bmw that would be 20k non cat. Then nope. They just seem to be a hard sell, hence offering them cheaper, smaller market when selling. Cant off load them to the we buy anys if you need to.
Looking at an Audi A1, about £4-5k for the daughter
Depends on who repaired it and what documentation there is of said repair.

Would you want your daughter driving around in a write off that you don't know the standard of repair on?

If it was superficial damage and/or you can get a thorough inspection to give you peace of mind, go for it.
Theoretical, according to the regs, there should be documented evidence of compliant repairs. In some respects, if it is done correctly, it would probably be safer than a car with no history at all, at that price point, or possibly higher!

ZX10R NIN

28,381 posts

132 months

Wednesday 2nd October
quotequote all
Road2Ruin said:
Looking at an Audi A1, about £4-5k for the daughter
Do a VCheck that way you'll be able to see the damage then when you view the car you know where to look.

If the car's the right price & the repair has been done properly then there's no reason not to buy.

AyBee

10,671 posts

209 months

Wednesday 2nd October
quotequote all
If I was repairing it myself and knew what the damage was, yes, otherwise unlikely.

ThingsBehindTheSun

1,245 posts

38 months

Wednesday 2nd October
quotequote all
Years ago I would have said no way, but cars get written off for very minor damage these days. I would not touch a cat S, but I would consider a Cat N that was under 5K and I had looked at myself.

Expensive cars, no.

PurpleTurtle

7,592 posts

151 months

Wednesday 2nd October
quotequote all
0ddball said:
Why not? Here in Bradford (where 90% of cars on FB marketplace are write offs), they've all been repaired to "the highest standard" laugh
Reminds me of this sign I saw on a backstreet welding shop in Ward End, Birmingham last week! hehe


Red9zero

7,908 posts

64 months

Wednesday 2nd October
quotequote all
While perusing the ads for (old) Defenders I often see Cat ones up for sale. Quite often it is doors and bonnet being stolen, often with seats etc. Sadly it is quite a regular occurrence. It is quite easily fixed, but not cheap, and if buying used parts you risk perpetuating the cycle.

davek_964

9,296 posts

182 months

Wednesday 2nd October
quotequote all
My first McLaren 650 Spider got written off as Cat N.

There was no significant impact to the car, but most panels had some (mostly superficial) damage. Front bumper was missing and the worse was probably the passenger door - the outer skin wasn't attached at the bottom anymore and could be lifted up.
One tyre was flat - although strangely, the wheel was still in perfect condition - and it had dumped all of its coolant.

It went to a salvage yard that auctioned it - and it sold immediately at £60k - I'd say that was about £25-30k less than a private sale would have got before the accident.
I know the buyer got it sorted out - although the last I heard it had some kind of idle issue, which it didn't before the accident.

Lester H

3,054 posts

112 months

Wednesday 2nd October
quotequote all
I have a number of trade contacts. The view is that ‘s’ is a no-no. Otherwise, car should be a third cheaper. As an example someone bought a few Kias ,or maybe Hyundais which had been written off because of the long wait for parts to repair fairly ‘ ordinary’ low speed cosmetic bumps and this, with the cost of courtesy cars ( equivalent replacement if customers make a fuss) made it easier for the insurer to bail out.


Edited by Lester H on Wednesday 2nd October 18:30

littlebasher

3,836 posts

178 months

Wednesday 2nd October
quotequote all
Most of the Cat S cars advertised on Facebook appear to 'only' had a small bump that required a quick polish rolleyes

I've bought a few in the past, where I had photos of the accident damage.

Only burnt once. A Micra i picked up was cat D and i was told that it only had the front wing changed. It quickly developed strange behaviour where it would pull left when accelerating and then right when braking
There was an invisible crack right through the nearside chassis leg that was pulling apart when accelerating, changing the geometry of the suspension!

Mr Tidy

24,321 posts

134 months

Wednesday 2nd October
quotequote all
brillomaster said:
Mr Tidy will be along shortly with a photograph of his bumper...
I won't bother as it looks like everyone has seen it already!

I've had a few recorded stolen/recovered cars in the past and never had a problem with them. I also had one that was a Cat D because it had been vandalised, but the only damage was to the velour interior - it looked like it had been smothered with curry or something similar. I managed to get a replacement leather interior from a breaker.

Like others I'd give Cat S a miss, but it doesn't take much damage to make an older car a Cat N. I'd like to see a photo or two of the damage before deciding whether to buy.

Countdown

42,032 posts

203 months

Wednesday 2nd October
quotequote all
When I was a student most of my cars were Cat D.

As a general rule I tended to buy stolen recovered or panel damage only. These tended to be easy repairs for the keen DIY’er and not require anything complicated like jigging. I was told to avoid anything that had frontal damage as you never knew how bad it might turn out and if any of the suspension components had moved it would be a bugger to get it realigned without £££.