Mercedes clk c209/w209

Mercedes clk c209/w209

Author
Discussion

rolo0151

Original Poster:

264 posts

178 months

Monday 2nd January 2017
quotequote all
Looking at getting a clk 320 or 280 (poss 240)

They seem great value at the moment & tick most of boxes for me.

Any major issues to be aware of & look out for? Seen a nice cabriolet local to me so not adverse to going down that route.
Is the 280 (7sp auto) worth the extra investment?

Cheers

ZX10R NIN

29,240 posts

140 months

Monday 2nd January 2017
quotequote all
The pre 2005 cars had a small issue with the vents the tell tale sign is a clicking noise from behind the dash on start up, it's not a big thing but it is a dash apart job.

The front suspension can wear but good quality replacements will cost around £250 but it's not a labour intensive job.

There were a few issues with 280/350 engine but those will have shown themselves by now also depending on your budget then also consider a 500 there really isn't a lot in it fuel wise, I prefer the look of the coupe.

If there's anything you'd like to know just ask as I have had a fair few of them so I've pretty much dealt with the most common problems but to be honest I really haven't had any big dramas which is why I'd happily recommend a CLK.


rolo0151

Original Poster:

264 posts

178 months

Monday 2nd January 2017
quotequote all
If I could find a tidy 500 locally I'd be interested.

Have you had a cabriolet? Is there a noticeable difference between the 240 & 320?

ZX10R NIN said:
The pre 2005 cars had a small issue with the vents the tell tale sign is a clicking noise from behind the dash on start up, it's not a big thing but it is a dash apart job.

The front suspension can wear but good quality replacements will cost around £250 but it's not a labour intensive job.

There were a few issues with 280/350 engine but those will have shown themselves by now also depending on your budget then also consider a 500 there really isn't a lot in it fuel wise, I prefer the look of the coupe.

If there's anything you'd like to know just ask as I have had a fair few of them so I've pretty much dealt with the most common problems but to be honest I really haven't had any big dramas which is why I'd happily recommend a CLK.

ZX10R NIN

29,240 posts

140 months

Monday 2nd January 2017
quotequote all
I've never owned a cabriolet I've driven a few & didn't like the scuttle shake that you'd feel every now & then both, the 240 will feel a little underpowered with the extra KG's the cabriolet carries.

I'd tend to go for a 320 over a 240 but you won't regret getting either.

If you don't mind heading to the Birmingham area then there's a 500 for sale.

http://www.ebay.co.uk/itm/2002-MERCEDES-CLK-500-AV...

Also some 280/350's are £500 road tax

Edited by ZX10R NIN on Monday 2nd January 20:43

qska

450 posts

144 months

Monday 2nd January 2017
quotequote all
I had a 240, it was a tad slow.

Lovely noise, but only in the higher end of the rev range, around dangerous speeds.

Avantgarde had a very stiff suspension which I hated.

Elegance much better comfort wise.

qska

450 posts

144 months

Monday 2nd January 2017
quotequote all
Check out my thread about a 4 month ownership of one here:
http://www.pistonheads.com/gassing/topic.asp?t=159...

rolo0151

Original Poster:

264 posts

178 months

Tuesday 3rd January 2017
quotequote all
Thanks for the advice.

Hopefully going to look at a 320 this week sometime 👍