Lexus IS200 Sport 03 vintage- Any good?

Lexus IS200 Sport 03 vintage- Any good?

Author
Discussion

yellowbentines

5,407 posts

210 months

Thursday 22nd September 2011
quotequote all
Some of the responses on these types of threads are bizarre, lots of comments starting with "Ive not driven", "Ive not owned" or "Ive heard"!!

My nephew owned one, he had it for years with minimal servicing so I think it must've been reliable, he didn't crash it so the handling and brakes were probably great but it probably didn't have too much power, I never saw him put petrol in it personally however he did change it for a Honda Civic so I think the mpg must be average.

HTH wink

anonymous-user

57 months

Thursday 22nd September 2011
quotequote all
I had my mates for a 6 months when he went abroad.

It was the automatic which is not so good for sporty driving, more like a gt car.

I liked the build quality, the feel on the interior and the car handled quite well for gt car. It also had all the toys, heated seats electric everything etc. Nothing really goes wrong with them, but make sure the service is up to date as they are complicated engines. I got mid 20's MPG and lots of sproty engine noise but not so much go forward movement.

The manual is rare so I would guess gives a better driving experiences for spirited runs.

If the price is right buy it, it is a well made car generally.


Rosun

141 posts

155 months

Thursday 22nd September 2011
quotequote all
I ran one for 130,000 miles.
Problems: Sidelight bulb blew after 90,000 miles.
A set of bushes @ 100k
New battery @ 120k
New front discs / pads all round @ 80k

That's it.

It was regularly (10,000 mile interval) serviced by Lexus who's customer service was second to none.

First set of tyres lasted 50k miles!

Watch out for alloys which appear to be made of soft cheese and the known CD player fault. <<Error CD not recognised>> seems to spring to mind. I recall that this was due to the laser lens becoming clogged up with bumpf, not something that can easily be rectified with a damp cloth.

My average MPG was around 33mpg.

TonyRPH

13,035 posts

171 months

Thursday 22nd September 2011
quotequote all
I had a '51 reg manual for a few months.

Observations were that the gearbox was noisy (seems to be common) and that the gearchange could be a bit notchy when changing to 2nd / 3rd.

Overall impression was that the car was nicely put together though.

I found the interior a little cramped compared to BMW 3 Series (E46) and Audi A4 (B5).

Overall ride quality was good, but a fair bit of wind noise.

I actually found the fuel consumption to be good, even though at times I would drive 'spiritedly'.

Power was found to be lacking at times, although torque was good and once up to speed, it was relatively easy to negotiate fairly steep inclines at 50+ in 6th gear.

The engine has to be one of the nicest sounding 6 cylinder units IMHO.

The sound system was superb - and the later models (post 2000 IIRC) don't suffer from the breaking CD player.

They are known for seizing calipers (usually the left side) and this can cost around £120 for an exchange unit.

Styling wise it's nice looking car from most angles except the rear, which lacks 'presence'.

The front can also look a little oversized from some angles.

All IMHO of course.

HTH.

Emeye

9,773 posts

226 months

Wednesday 28th September 2011
quotequote all
OP, what mileage is it? Have you decided to go for it?

I've just been offered a 2001, Y plate IS200 Sport for £2k with 97k miles on the clock. Going to look at it tomorrow, my only concern is the performance v mpg.

Anyone know if the engine is a belt or chain?

Edited by Emeye on Wednesday 28th September 16:14

TonyRPH

13,035 posts

171 months

Wednesday 28th September 2011
quotequote all
It's a belt.

Emeye

9,773 posts

226 months

Wednesday 28th September 2011
quotequote all
TonyRPH said:
It's a belt.
Cheers, Any idea when it needs changing, purrrrleese?

TonyRPH

13,035 posts

171 months

Wednesday 28th September 2011
quotequote all
60k miles IIRC.

TonyHetherington

32,091 posts

253 months

Wednesday 28th September 2011
quotequote all
Blimey - for £2k ?! My one - a 2001Y IS200 sport - was about £15k or something like than in 2003ish!

Great value yes

TonyRPH

13,035 posts

171 months

Wednesday 28th September 2011
quotequote all
I just sold mine after spending close to £1k on it - 4x new tyres / 4x new discs and a caliper.

Gearbox was a bit noisy and the clutch would judder sometimes.

Now for sale at a dealer for £2795

Bargain for someone...


pidsy

8,078 posts

160 months

Wednesday 28th September 2011
quotequote all
most comfortable interior ive ever sat in.

Emeye

9,773 posts

226 months

Wednesday 28th September 2011
quotequote all
I'm just concerned that I could get much better performance for the poor mpg for the money - if you get where I'm coming from?

Most stuff I've looked at does about 29-30mpg but an E39 325/328/330 is somewhat quicker, as is an Audi A4 1.8T.

k15tox

1,680 posts

184 months

Wednesday 28th September 2011
quotequote all
Mr Dave said:
Rover214 iS 5d (99) 9.9 s 115 mph 101 bhp.

So really with RWD cars being harder to launch that probably explains it then.

All im saying is they arent fast, but the Is200 is in every way a lovely car. The is300 is even better but only automatic.

Driven an Altezza and that was a car I would love to own, not hugely powerful either but quite sporty in its own way.
RWD harder to launch?

you joking right? smile

chris333

1,034 posts

242 months

Wednesday 28th September 2011
quotequote all
I owned one for 5 years and 70-od thousand miles. Most of the points have already been mentioned:

Great reliability
Great Noise
Great Stereo
Fairly Decent handling
6-speed manual gearchange was sweet

Poor Fuel consumption (think I averaged about 25mpg, was nearly impossible to get more than 30 even on a run)
Clutch judder
Rubbish alloys
4 speed autos that I had as courtesy cars were terrible


If fuel consumption is a concern, then this is not the car for you!


Al K

113 posts

154 months

Thursday 29th September 2011
quotequote all
I've owned two - a 200 and a 300.

As has been said above - both were bullet proof as far as reliability went. Servicing is surprisingly cheap (even at dealers) but cheaper still at indies since it's mostly common Toyota parts.

If you can handle an auto - go for a 300 (3ltr 2JZ-GE - same engine as in na Supra). 5 speed auto not the dreadful 4 speed in the 200.

Alloys are made of chocolate, both cars are quite thirsty and neither are what you would call quick.

An '03 Sport - should have LSD and be 15mm (?) lower than a standard SE.

The stereo sounds like the dreaded "ERR3" which is a common fault and basically means CD player is kaput. Repairs are ridiculously expensive so you'll either have to fit an aftermarket unit or there is a nice little ipod adapter box which you can fit which allows the ipod to be controlled through the normal head unit.

I wrote a walkthrough for installing those a while back here:-

http://www.lexusownersclub.co.uk/forum/index.php?s...

One very nice thing about buying a second hand one is you don't have to fret about a huge list of options (currently looking at second hand BMW's - it's a headache). AFAIK the only real "options" were sat nav and styling kit. Everything else was standard per model.

IS200 'S' - 16" alloys, cloth seats, no sunroof, stereo with no amp.
IS200 'SE' - 17" alloys, sun roof, 1/2 leather interior, stereo with amp, heated seats
IS200 'SPORT' - all of the above plus LSD and lower ride height (beyond a certain year - 2001?)
IS200 'LE' - all of the above plus full leather (and a unique colour) and HID's

IS300 - full leather, 5 speed auto only although with "e-shift" (gear change buttons on steering wheel) HID lights.

They do suffer from uneven tyre wear at the front - but as mentioned earlier this can be fixed by a visit to Dr. Tony @ WIM.

Despite the lack of speed - I loved mine. Quite handsome cars and the very definition of reliable. You get a lot of toys as standard - and at 102,000miles and 11years old - literally everything still worked the same as it did when it was new.

J4CKO

41,894 posts

203 months

Thursday 29th September 2011
quotequote all
Mr Dave said:
We raced one from the lights in bristol 4 up in a rover 214. The rover won.

Other than being slow they are lovely cars, I love the instrument cluster and its lovely to drive. The Altezza is a great fun car, the is200 a sensible and comfortable car but not as sporty as it looks.
Yep, that rings true, I had a Metro GTi when the IS200 came out and one decided to overtake me in a rash move given the circumstances (busy road, oncoming traffic, just not the place to do it) the driver decides not to run the red light so ends up next to me, it wasnt pretty, Metro GTi itself not massively quick but it destroyed the Lexus and boy he was trying, remember these had just come out and there was quite an image to them then, being beat by a turdy Metro cant have been good for his ego, "Needless to say, I had the last laugh" (for the Partidge fans).

So, nice enough car but slow and fairly crap economy, 25 mpg to get wasted by pretty much any modern turbo diesel.