EV's pollute more than diesel cars....

EV's pollute more than diesel cars....

Author
Discussion

jason61c

Original Poster:

5,978 posts

179 months

Friday 25th October 2019
quotequote all

Dave Hedgehog

14,660 posts

209 months

Friday 25th October 2019
quotequote all
ooh a German study has found EVs are a scam against their super environmentally friendly ice cap repairing diesel engines

LMFAO

does the German power grid consist of 100% 1950s coal powered generators?

ahh and then they mention methane lol




Edited by Dave Hedgehog on Friday 25th October 14:23

sjg

7,518 posts

270 months

Friday 25th October 2019
quotequote all
The study, for instance, estimates that driving a Tesla Model 3 in Germany is responsible for 156 to 181 grams of CO2 per kilometer. That is more than a diesel-powered Mercedes C220d which produces just 141 grams per kilometer.

Because refined diesel just magically appears in the fuel tank of the Mercedes?

It doesn't require ships to transport oil around the world, it doesn't require massive amounts of energy to run the refineries, it doesn't require diesel-powered trucks to get to from the refineries to the fuel stations?

Nonsense as ever to support the laggard parts of the German auto industry.

joema

2,684 posts

184 months

Friday 25th October 2019
quotequote all
I wonder if they captured the drilling, refining and transportation of diesel in their calculations?

DailyHack

3,406 posts

116 months

Friday 25th October 2019
quotequote all
It is common knowledge the best thing one person can do for the environment (petrol or diesel) is to keep whatever car you have for a long period of time, this offsets any carbon footprint produced.

But as we live in a "completely throw away society" and we must have the newest and best cars on our drive (I don't by the way, I must be boring, or look poor) biggrin but I quite like that, anyway the cost on the environment is HUGE in the production of any new cars, not only electric - we are still raping the earth.

Driving an electric car may be great for local pollution, but it isn't the answer I am afraid to the global issue, It just pumps it elsewhere when being made, and I don't know what the answer is, so do not ask me - but not replacing your car for a new one is a start i think. smile

sjg

7,518 posts

270 months

Friday 25th October 2019
quotequote all
Also Germany's power generation is still mostly coal. But they're all being phased out over the next 19 years which will improve the EV CO2 figure drastically.

Dave Hedgehog

14,660 posts

209 months

Friday 25th October 2019
quotequote all
Their website reads like a car lobbyists wet dream and spouts the same sort of crap that Merkel has come out with

coldel

8,345 posts

151 months

Friday 25th October 2019
quotequote all
I havent bothered reading what will be a retarded article, but isnt the issue with diesel not CO2 but in fact its NO thats the problem - that is also killing people and the environment

Ultrafunkula

998 posts

110 months

Friday 25th October 2019
quotequote all
DailyHack said:
It is common knowledge the best thing one person can do for the environment (petrol or diesel) is to keep whatever car you have for a long period of time, this offsets any carbon footprint produced.
Actually the best thing would be to reduce or eliminate the need for a car entirely. Converting an existing car to EV would be the second best going forwards.

In fact ignoring the problem and carrying on with an existing ICE car would be one of the worst things to do long term.

Dave Hedgehog

14,660 posts

209 months

Friday 25th October 2019
quotequote all
DailyHack said:
It is common knowledge the best thing one person can do for the environment (petrol or diesel) is to keep whatever car you have for a long period of time, this offsets any carbon footprint produced.
lots of articles refuting that

This guy seams pretty smart (compared to me anyway) and pretty unbiased owning an EV and a petrol sports car

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6RhtiPefVzM

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2rywz73vwKw

anonymous-user

59 months

Friday 25th October 2019
quotequote all
This myth is never going to die. It's too good for people who feel guilty about owning a diesel.

Fastlane

1,256 posts

222 months

Friday 25th October 2019
quotequote all
DailyHack said:
It is common knowledge the best thing one person can do for the environment (petrol or diesel) is to keep whatever car you have for a long period of time, this offsets any carbon footprint produced.

But as we live in a "completely throw away society" and we must have the newest and best cars on our drive (I don't by the way, I must be boring, or look poor) biggrin but I quite like that, anyway the cost on the environment is HUGE in the production of any new cars, not only electric - we are still raping the earth.

Driving an electric car may be great for local pollution, but it isn't the answer I am afraid to the global issue, It just pumps it elsewhere when being made, and I don't know what the answer is, so do not ask me - but not replacing your car for a new one is a start i think. smile
Taking this argument to its logical end, our entire global economy is based on the assumption that we have to continually increase consumption of everything. Any rational human (so I am excluding anyone who voted for Trump & Brexit) realise that this is by definition, unsustainable. Ultimately, like universal healthcare, EVs will just help us all live even longer, so that we can continue to consume for even longer...

oop north

1,604 posts

133 months

Friday 25th October 2019
quotequote all
I was struck by a statistic quoted on fully charged podcast the other day to the effect that 35% of global shipping emissions come from shipping oil and petrol products around. That won’t be accounted for in the joke article referred to

jjwilde

1,904 posts

101 months

Friday 25th October 2019
quotequote all
Reminds me of when the cigarette companies used to produce studies claiming smoking didn't cause cancer.

Heartworm

1,930 posts

166 months

Friday 25th October 2019
quotequote all
DailyHack said:
It is common knowledge the best thing one person can do for the environment (petrol or diesel) is to keep whatever car you have for a long period of time, this offsets any carbon footprint produced.
Best thing one person can do for the environment would be to kill themselves...little over the top though.

Evanivitch

21,551 posts

127 months

Friday 25th October 2019
quotequote all
Silly German said:
The authors argue that other technologies, such as hydrogen-powered electric vehicles or vehicles with combustion engines powered by green methane, offer better alternatives and are ignored at the expense of EVs.
So where does this magical hydrogen come from?



MrOrange

2,037 posts

258 months

Friday 25th October 2019
quotequote all
Evanivitch said:
So where does this magical hydrogen come from?
Off-shore wind farms

jjwilde

1,904 posts

101 months

Friday 25th October 2019
quotequote all
MrOrange said:
Off-shore wind farms
You just drive your imaginary inefficient hydrogen car right up to the side of them and fill up I guess.

hixster

354 posts

222 months

Friday 25th October 2019
quotequote all
DailyHack said:
Driving an electric car may be great for local pollution, but it isn't the answer I am afraid to the global issue, It just pumps it elsewhere when being made
Pushing the problem elsewhere - This is the common perception but not entirely true and not part of Tesla’s bigger picture. The Tesla wall battery with solar cells is helping reduce the amount of electricity required from the grid. As this technology evolves, more people will be weaning themselves off the grid.
A challenge in climates such as ours, but in sunny countries, becoming possible.

Witchfinder

6,250 posts

257 months

Saturday 26th October 2019
quotequote all
Christ, not this st again? Every reputable study shows that EVs will at least halve emissions over an equivalent combustion engine vehicle over it's life, even using a crappy energy mix like the one found in Germany.

That "study" has been comprehensively debunked, and was carried out by an economic foundation based in Munich. They used deliberately old and misleading figures. The professor involved has form for similar stuff in the past.

Edited by Witchfinder on Saturday 26th October 08:43