How is this a breech of Rule 6?
How is this a breech of Rule 6?
Author
Discussion

Byker28i

Original Poster:

78,292 posts

235 months

Monday 8th September
quotequote all
Rule 6: Do not post for the purpose of advertising for personal or business gain, unless you are responding to a thread in the Car Buying forum and sharing a link to your car that's for sale in the PistonHeads classifieds or adding your PistonHeads classifieds listing to your Readers' Cars thread. Starting a thread specifically to advertise your classified listing or business is not allowed. Other items for sale can only be posted in the respective Marketplace forum and you must not share links to your items for sale outside of this forum.


Dear Byker28i,

Your post has been deleted due to unauthorized advertising or promotional content, violating point 6 or 22 of our Rules of Posting. Please review our Rules of Posting for more information.

Topic: https://www.pistonheads.com/gassing/topic.asp?t=21...
Topic Title: 47th President Of The United States - Donald Trump. VOL. 3
Reply:
From yesterday
Byker28i said:
trumps basing his policies on what he sees on Fox news again

trump told reporters that he might send national guard troops into Portland, Oregon, apparently because he was misled about the scale of small protests there by a TV report on Fox News that incorrectly presented video recorded in 2020 as having taken place this summer.

What Fox News lying to its viewers again! Who would have thought - oh no wait...
https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2025/sep/05/tr...


Kind regards,

The PH Team


Sorry? I don't understand this. No advertising, no copy and paste (so can't claim rule 16 and it's been 5 years now of the lawyers 'looking' at it)
It's a summary and a link to a Guardian story

Byker28i

Original Poster:

78,292 posts

235 months

Tuesday 9th September
quotequote all
No answer then?

Terminator X

18,288 posts

222 months

Tuesday 9th September
quotequote all
I got the same yesterday. Post deleted for same reason but I wasn't selling anything.

TX.

Master Bean

4,611 posts

138 months

Tuesday 9th September
quotequote all
Punishment for posting about Trump. Stick to pedal powered. Much nicer.

Byker28i

Original Poster:

78,292 posts

235 months

Wednesday 10th September
quotequote all
Master Bean said:
Punishment for posting about Trump. Stick to pedal powered. Much nicer.
I'm not selling anything either

I don't think my comments about lyrca clad roadhogs would go down well biggrin Having said that, I'm often in Antwerp on pedal power, but with battery assist smile

Edited by Byker28i on Wednesday 10th September 08:34

Ben Lowden

7,085 posts

195 months

PH Marketing Bloke

PH TEAM

Thursday 11th September
quotequote all
I've had a look at this for you - the moderator didn't select the correct moderation option when taking action. There is no further context, but I would say it looks like this is speculation, potentially defamatory or libellous, which is why it was removed.

ChevronB19

8,444 posts

181 months

Thursday 11th September
quotequote all
It’s good of you to reply Ben, but in all honesty, pretty much all of NP&E consists of ‘speculation, potentially defamatory or libellous’.

vaud

55,895 posts

173 months

Thursday 11th September
quotequote all
If you want to remove potentially libellous comments then PH should just dump NP&E.

Byker28i

Original Poster:

78,292 posts

235 months

Friday 12th September
quotequote all
ChevronB19 said:
It s good of you to reply Ben, but in all honesty, pretty much all of NP&E consists of speculation, potentially defamatory or libellous .
But it's not speculation at all.

But ok, you're playground. Weird though, considering how many speculation, potentially defamatory or libellous things are said about me. I'll start reporting them then

ChevronB19

8,444 posts

181 months

Saturday 13th September
quotequote all
Byker28i said:
ChevronB19 said:
It s good of you to reply Ben, but in all honesty, pretty much all of NP&E consists of speculation, potentially defamatory or libellous .
But it's not speculation at all.

But ok, you're playground. Weird though, considering how many speculation, potentially defamatory or libellous things are said about me. I'll start reporting them then
Byker, I think you are replying to the wrong person - I’m not a mod, and my comment was semi-flippant.

paulw123

4,239 posts

208 months

Thursday 25th September
quotequote all
Just had this:

Dear paulw123,

Your post has been deleted due to unauthorized advertising or promotional content, violating point 6 or 22 of our Rules of Posting. Please review our Rules of Posting for more information.

Topic: https://www.pistonheads.com/gassing/topic.asp?t=20...
Topic Title: A bit council (Vol 6)
Reply:
WindyCommon said:
Wearing a dressing gown to the supermarket…


In Tesco this eve there were 3 seperate women in coats/hoody's and pajama bottoms


Kind regards,

The PH Team

This is the second time I've had a post deleted that had nothing to do with what rule it was suposed the break.

How does my post of " In Tesco this eve there were 3 seperate women in coats/hoody's and pajama bottoms"
Break point 6 or 22?

Rusty Old-Banger

5,997 posts

231 months

Thursday 25th September
quotequote all
It's a crime against spelling and grammar, if nothing else hehe

Super Sonic

10,453 posts

72 months

Thursday 25th September
quotequote all
Advertising Tesco's?

paulw123

4,239 posts

208 months

Thursday 25th September
quotequote all
Super Sonic said:
Advertising Tesco's?
So I needed to put 'Supermarket' instead?

There's literally a whole thread called. 'I've just had lunch in Wetherspoons'

Makes no sense whatsoever.

dickymint

27,605 posts

276 months

Friday 26th September
quotequote all
paulw123 said:
Super Sonic said:
Advertising Tesco's?
So I needed to put 'Supermarket' instead?

There's literally a whole thread called. 'I've just had lunch in Wetherspoons'

Makes no sense whatsoever.
Absolutely and seems to be a common denominator with Bykers thread deletion :scratchchin

Ted Maul

1,355 posts

24 months

Friday 26th September
quotequote all
Ben Lowden said:
I've had a look at this for you - the moderator didn't select the correct moderation option when taking action. There is no further context, but I would say it looks like this is speculation, potentially defamatory or libellous, which is why it was removed.
rofl

Almost Karoline Leavitt but not quite.