Whores being advertised…

Whores being advertised…

Author
Discussion

EmailAddress

12,522 posts

221 months

B'stard Child said:
EmailAddress said:
Does it even matter. Any 'guidance' is for the five vaguely interested people in this thread and not going to reach the eyes of the users as a whole.

May as well just leave them to it.
Might not matter to you and that's fine

If we are creating issues for the mods that take longer to resolve than cleaning up the spammers I'm pretty sure the five vaguely interested people would rather not do that.
Exactly my point.

I tried to help too.

But with constant mixed messages, and still no resolution.

May as well leave them (the Mods) to it.

Each to their own though of course (the Users, if they wish to 'help').

sunbeam alpine

6,994 posts

191 months

Super Sonic said:
If you haven't, biggles has helpfully reposted the phone numbers.
Helpfully for the scammers.
So that's why there are so many ejaculations in the Biggles books. smile

Big Al.

69,032 posts

261 months

B'stard Child said:
OK So this is a change to previous guidance

Previously

One "report" per spammer user ID was all that was required

Then respond to the threads either saying reported (or humorous comment AKA Rusty) that should stop other PH'rs also reporting reducing the clean up needed in the reporting process (which none of us can see)

Now

"Just report one post - maybe put something in the comments to say "Spammers - hundreds of em"

Post up in the threads to say reported to help reduce the level of reports submitted?

Have I got that right
I'm not trying to be difficult here, I'm just saying that as soon as we see "A" single report come in we will act on it "if we're around/".

All I'm trying to do is to stop you wasting your time reporting every thread.

This is how I works for me, when I come back to my lappy I check the PH members dump (new registration area. Scan that for members who have just signed up and see if any have made a post or raised a thread, check them out to see what they have posted etc. I can see instantly from the members page how many threads/posts each member has just posted.
The limit of posts/threads a noobie can post in the first 24 hours is 5, so lots of new members making 2-5 posts indicates a possible spammers I'll check and ban all those that fall into this category deleting all their posts.
I'll them go into the Mods forum and check on the number of reports that have come in this morning for instance there was about 40, I'll reply to a couple and close and then delete the rest as it just clutters up the forum.

So to sum up we only really need one report from one spammer, not one report for each thread he's raised.

Hope that clarifies and again thanks for all your help. smile


Fore Left

1,443 posts

185 months

Big Al. said:
I'm not trying to be difficult here, I'm just saying that as soon as we see "A" single report come in we will act on it "if we're around/".

All I'm trying to do is to stop you wasting your time reporting every thread.

This is how I works for me, when I come back to my lappy I check the PH members dump (new registration area. Scan that for members who have just signed up and see if any have made a post or raised a thread, check them out to see what they have posted etc. I can see instantly from the members page how many threads/posts each member has just posted.
The limit of posts/threads a noobie can post in the first 24 hours is 5, so lots of new members making 2-5 posts indicates a possible spammers I'll check and ban all those that fall into this category deleting all their posts.
I'll them go into the Mods forum and check on the number of reports that have come in this morning for instance there was about 40, I'll reply to a couple and close and then delete the rest as it just clutters up the forum.

So to sum up we only really need one report from one spammer, not one report for each thread he's raised.

Hope that clarifies and again thanks for all your help. smile
Thank you for your tireless efforts to remove these posts.

In reality however, PistonHeads management is exploiting your goodwill and willingness to do this and while you and other mods continue to do so they have no incentive to fix the problem. As many people, me included, have highlighted, it's relatively trivial - regardless of how archaic the codebase is - to implement something in code to stop the majority of the posts.

B'stard Child

28,720 posts

249 months

Big Al. said:
B'stard Child said:
OK So this is a change to previous guidance

Previously

One "report" per spammer user ID was all that was required

Then respond to the threads either saying reported (or humorous comment AKA Rusty) that should stop other PH'rs also reporting reducing the clean up needed in the reporting process (which none of us can see)

Now

"Just report one post - maybe put something in the comments to say "Spammers - hundreds of em"

Post up in the threads to say reported to help reduce the level of reports submitted?

Have I got that right
I'm not trying to be difficult here, I'm just saying that as soon as we see "A" single report come in we will act on it "if we're around/".

All I'm trying to do is to stop you wasting your time reporting every thread.

This is how I works for me, when I come back to my lappy I check the PH members dump (new registration area. Scan that for members who have just signed up and see if any have made a post or raised a thread, check them out to see what they have posted etc. I can see instantly from the members page how many threads/posts each member has just posted.
The limit of posts/threads a noobie can post in the first 24 hours is 5, so lots of new members making 2-5 posts indicates a possible spammers I'll check and ban all those that fall into this category deleting all their posts.
I'll them go into the Mods forum and check on the number of reports that have come in this morning for instance there was about 40, I'll reply to a couple and close and then delete the rest as it just clutters up the forum.

So to sum up we only really need one report from one spammer, not one report for each thread he's raised.

Hope that clarifies and again thanks for all your help. smile
Yep

Clear to me - as per previously laid down guidelines

One "report" post per spammer user ID

Then "if we have the time respond to the other threads from that spammer either saying "reported" (or humorous comment AKA Rusty)

That should stop other PH'rs duplicate reporting reducing the clean up needed in the reporting process


The Rotrex Kid

30,733 posts

163 months

Fore Left said:
Big Al. said:
I'm not trying to be difficult here, I'm just saying that as soon as we see "A" single report come in we will act on it "if we're around/".

All I'm trying to do is to stop you wasting your time reporting every thread.

This is how I works for me, when I come back to my lappy I check the PH members dump (new registration area. Scan that for members who have just signed up and see if any have made a post or raised a thread, check them out to see what they have posted etc. I can see instantly from the members page how many threads/posts each member has just posted.
The limit of posts/threads a noobie can post in the first 24 hours is 5, so lots of new members making 2-5 posts indicates a possible spammers I'll check and ban all those that fall into this category deleting all their posts.
I'll them go into the Mods forum and check on the number of reports that have come in this morning for instance there was about 40, I'll reply to a couple and close and then delete the rest as it just clutters up the forum.

So to sum up we only really need one report from one spammer, not one report for each thread he's raised.

Hope that clarifies and again thanks for all your help. smile
Thank you for your tireless efforts to remove these posts.

In reality however, PistonHeads management is exploiting your goodwill and willingness to do this and while you and other mods continue to do so they have no incentive to fix the problem. As many people, me included, have highlighted, it's relatively trivial - regardless of how archaic the codebase is - to implement something in code to stop the majority of the posts.
With due respect, you don’t know what is happening or the hoops being jumped through. There is no exploitation, we help because we want to, if we didn’t, we can just say ‘thanks, but no thanks’

I personally quite enjoy bashing a spammer. Makes me feel like I’ve achieved something that day hehe

TonyRPH

13,040 posts

171 months

Fore Left said:
Thank you for your tireless efforts to remove these posts.

In reality however, PistonHeads management is exploiting your goodwill and willingness to do this and while you and other mods continue to do so they have no incentive to fix the problem. As many people, me included, have highlighted, it's relatively trivial - regardless of how archaic the codebase is - to implement something in code to stop the majority of the posts.
This is something I don't understand either. The forum software is somewhat outdated, and various (major) bugs have been reported by PH'er over the years.

And yet all they do is keep patching it with band aid, and intrusive software (being unable to post anything remotely resembling SQL statements for example and also the anti flood system, another pointless addition).


B'stard Child said:
Yep

Clear to me - as per previously laid down guidelines

One "report" post per spammer user ID

Then "if we have the time respond to the other threads from that spammer either saying "reported" (or humorous comment AKA Rusty)

That should stop other PH'rs duplicate reporting reducing the clean up needed in the reporting process
The one report per spammer was precisely what I did this morning, along with trying to mark the post as reported (but the anti flood system made that difficult as I was forced to wait around 10 seconds or so before I could post after reporting).



EmailAddress

12,522 posts

221 months

Here's a relevant explanation pitched at the demographic and age range of the forum audience about how the PH Towers resources are allocated.

The Main Dig Team. For the revenue making website, business, and associated maintenance of said.




Then the Second Dig Team that Carenza can run, with the allocated resources of a single mini excavator to keep the old stbox forum that came as part of the package deal that somehow still drives X% of click engagement due to historic spider links and search queries from boomers with money, but no apps.


Fore Left

1,443 posts

185 months

The Rotrex Kid said:
With due respect, you don’t know what is happening or the hoops being jumped through.
I don't but I do know there hasn't been a single post on this thread from a PH person.

The Rotrex Kid said:
I personally quite enjoy bashing a spammer. Makes me feel like I’ve achieved something that day hehe
Again, thanks for doing it. I'm happy that you're happy smile

EmailAddress

12,522 posts

221 months

Big Al, Scrump, and Ben are more than Mods.

They're our friends we've made along the way.


(Apologies to anyone I missed)

Jordie Barretts sock

5,103 posts

22 months

EmailAddress said:
Big Al, Scrump, and Ben are more than Mods.

They're our friends we've made along the way.


(Apologies to anyone I missed)
Jeez, pass me a bucket! biggrin

EmailAddress

12,522 posts

221 months

Jordie Barretts sock said:
EmailAddress said:
Big Al, Scrump, and Ben are more than Mods.

They're our friends we've made along the way.


(Apologies to anyone I missed)
Jeez, pass me a bucket! biggrin
I thought you'd use a sock to be honest scratchchin

Monkeylegend

26,723 posts

234 months

Fore Left said:
The Rotrex Kid said:
With due respect, you don’t know what is happening or the hoops being jumped through.
I don't but I do know there hasn't been a single post on this thread from a PH person.

The Rotrex Kid said:
I personally quite enjoy bashing a spammer. Makes me feel like I’ve achieved something that day hehe
Again, thanks for doing it. I'm happy that you're happy smile
I am sure I read a post from Ben saying it as being looked into and he would update in due course once he had checked out all the numbers were genuine.

Ignore the last little bit hehe

EmailAddress

12,522 posts

221 months

loudlashadjuster

5,259 posts

187 months

If the cleanup effort on the part of the mods is greater then the spam removal itself, then surely there’s a cast-iron case for just turning this on its head and doing what many have suggested and putting all new accounts into an approval queue.

The mods’ still have to put in the graft, but not one spam post makes it through and we don’t need to report anything.

There simply cannot be that many genuine new accounts who might need to wait 10-30 mins before posting to make any difference.

sunbeam alpine

6,994 posts

191 months

The Rotrex Kid said:
I personally quite enjoy bashing a spammer. hehe
I SO hope that isn't a euphemism...

P.S. Everyone moaning about this - we have a (largely) great community which offers help, advice and much more.

And it's free. Let's not moan.

Maybe buy a few new mirrors for the mod's scooters? nuts

Mercdriver

2,266 posts

36 months

+1

Kinky

39,695 posts

272 months

sunbeam alpine said:
Maybe buy a few new mirrors for the mod's scooters? nuts
I've still got some room to add some yes


Fore Left

1,443 posts

185 months

Tuesday
quotequote all
Monkeylegend said:
I am sure I read a post from Ben saying it as being looked into and he would update in due course once he had checked out all the numbers were genuine.

Ignore the last little bit hehe
My apologies I checked back and on the 21st May getmecoat

Ben Lowden said:
We are actively trying to reduce spam and are still investigating more routes available to us. Unfortunately thanks to the forums being on very ageing technology, it's not easy.

A huge thanks to the mods for continuing to bash the spam as it comes in, we'll try and put an end to it as soon as we can.

greygoose

8,379 posts

198 months

Tuesday
quotequote all
Not sure if this is related or not but Rhino Box seem to be replying to all sorts of threads to promote their wares.