Why was one Enzo worth 750,000 less than another?
Discussion
bobthemonkey said:
The red car had an replacement engine - an issue for those who consider matching numbers to be important perhaps.
Black was also a lot rarer.
didn't realise the red car had a new engine? Must admit we wondered why it was left at 2.5 when it appeared a much better car than the black one. Do you know if the mileage quoted (<10k km on the red car) was on the new engine only?Black was also a lot rarer.
cc8s said:
I think there were a handful of original Nero cars. If this is one of them, that could partly explain the difference.
maybe partly but certainly not £750k? New engine and therefore non-matching numbers would be a good candidate for the difference? Not sure Nero is the best colour for an Enzo, Rosso is much more in keeping!
I was informed that the owner of the black Enzo didn't actually go through with selling the car. Make of that what you will. But my thoughts were if he can effectively revalue his car at £700K more than its actually worth for the cost of the buyers premium (£6K) seems a smart financial move if you ask me!
jwdh1 said:
sparta6 said:
It will be interesting to see what the matt black Brunei car goes for
that's a work of art isn't it, sealed bids will make it difficult to find out what it went for though. Anyone know what the white one went for a few months ago? That was sealed bids at Sothebys again.
I suspect the cat will eventually slip out of the bag re: black Brunei sale price
Gassing Station | Ferrari V12 | Top of Page | What's New | My Stuff