UPDATE to exclusions wording on Porsche extended warranty Ef
UPDATE to exclusions wording on Porsche extended warranty Ef
Author
Discussion

Mrspaceman1971

Original Poster:

6 posts

32 months

Yesterday (09:23)
quotequote all
Good morning all,

I have just picked up a 991.2 4s - Stunning spec 2017 car with low mileage (10500). I purchased from OPC and paid to have extra 1yr warranty on top of the 2yr cover they provide.My reasoning for this was to make sure I was well covered with any potential issues with turbos etc.

However I have now noticed the wording to the Porsche extended warranty (effective from 15th September 2025 "whats not covered section" has now been changed to include the following :-

i) Corrosion, rust, oxidation or any damage or detection caused by corrosion, regardless of the origin, location or extent of the corrosion.

Would the effect claims on 991.2 failed turbos?

Thoughts on this would be appreciated.

Thanks

scrounger73

402 posts

175 months

Yesterday (09:43)
quotequote all
That would be a question to your OPC but there's a good chance they wouldn't know either. An email to Porsche GB may help but I was under the impression that the turbo failure on the 991.2 was due to a failed oil return/feed pipe and not corrosion.

If this is the case you should be fine.

arcamalpha

1,113 posts

181 months

Yesterday (12:06)
quotequote all
This seems like a fairly significant change. I wonder what made them want to remove that element of cover.

BlackTails

1,931 posts

72 months

Yesterday (12:08)
quotequote all
arcamalpha said:
This seems like a fairly significant change. I wonder what made them want to remove that element of cover.
Too many claims.

gtsralph

1,287 posts

161 months

Yesterday (13:59)
quotequote all
How does this play with the 12 year corrosion warranty on new cars? Presumably this would not be removed for original owners nor any time during the first 3 manufacturers years warranty?

Mrspaceman1971

Original Poster:

6 posts

32 months

Yesterday (14:09)
quotequote all
Sorry I should have been clear this stipulation comes under:

2. A claim made under Your Policy for the repair or replacement of a defective system or component shall be invalid to the extent that the defect results from any of the following:

various clauses but included is :-
i) Corrosion, rust, oxidation or any damage or deterioration caused by corrosion, regardless of the origin, location, or extent of the corrosion.

Mrspaceman1971

Original Poster:

6 posts

32 months

Crumpet

4,627 posts

197 months

Yesterday (16:06)
quotequote all
Many failures can be pinned on corrosion, from circuit boards to electronic connectors to bearings to mountings. Would seem like quite a significant exclusion, can’t remember if I’ve see that on Aston and Land Rover warranties that I’ve had previously.

Mrspaceman1971

Original Poster:

6 posts

32 months

Yesterday (16:46)
quotequote all
Does anyone know has there been any issues with corrosion of pipes etc leading to the turbo failures? Or is the root cause something different ?

Mayhem911

174 posts

153 months

Yesterday (21:16)
quotequote all
It was my understanding that it was a manufacturing fault with the oil feed pipe, and that debris was present in the pipe. If any body else has heard any thing about it please tell us. I have had 2 new turbos and pipes on my gts done under warranty recently.

Hotrods1974

143 posts

29 months

This is a major chance to the insurance policy (which it is rather than a warranty per se). Based on past experiences with my OPC and a claim for failed brake shoes / parking brake - let’s just say that they can now more or less pin anything on this exclusion cause

Genius on their part. Absolutely shocking for a customer.

Specific to the turbos as others have said this is has always been a result of oil feed issues - but all the diagnostic now needs to say is that it is as a result of corrosion.

Don’t think for one minute OPCs are not in the least bit disingenuous or indeed suffer from nefarious tendencies to help wiggle out of expenses.