Early signs of bore scoring- what happened after?
Early signs of bore scoring- what happened after?
Author
Discussion

bluetigerandy

Original Poster:

21 posts

71 months

Wednesday 23rd August 2023
quotequote all
On a borescope my friend's car (he is in his early 70s and not really an internet user) has signs of early scoring in cylinder 6. Its a 997.1 C2S. He had asked for it to be checked during a plug change.
Running well, needing no oil top ups between changes (approx 3000 miles). No external signs etc.
Has anyone had a car like this that has run well long term and not had things progress? Or when scoring starts is progression a certainty?
Thanks

Paynewright

659 posts

93 months

Wednesday 23rd August 2023
quotequote all
I dont have an answer to your friends findings however if faced with the same situation I’d just run it till the oil usage becomes untenable. If he’s only doing 3000-5000 miles a year that could be a long time.

Perhaps consider oil analysis and changing more frequently so any debris removed sooner.


The other thing to do is take advice from a good independant specialist - having read lots of IMS horror stories I spoke to my indy (GCR central) who said if there are no signs of a problem leave well alone. As it happens, when fixing an oil leak he found mine had more play than was acceptable so it was changed.

ATM

19,925 posts

235 months

Thursday 24th August 2023
quotequote all
bluetigerandy said:
when scoring starts is progression a certainty
Yes

It will get worse


Discombobulate

5,613 posts

202 months

Thursday 24th August 2023
quotequote all
Well, mine went from brand new engine to being replaced under new car warranty due to excess oil consumption and sooting within 7500 miles and 18 months of leaving the factory. Scoring in 5 and 6.
My second one was picked up at 65k during a pre-emptive conversion to 4.1 so no idea how long that would have gone on.

p4cks

7,164 posts

215 months

Thursday 24th August 2023
quotequote all
The internet scare stories are real I'm afraid. These engines are one of the most delicate ever produced and sadly the bore-scoring is likely to get worse.

On the positive side, given the fella doesn't do many miles, it'll either a) be long gone and someone elses problem or b) not manifest into catastrophic failure for a few years yet

ATM

19,925 posts

235 months

Thursday 24th August 2023
quotequote all
The sensible thing to do would be sell it now. Ideally px it or We Buy Any Car. I have no idea how a dealer would value a car like this without a thorough inspection for bore score. Maybe if he really is 70 then it's an advantage as no one would assume the old boy is pulling a fast one.

tracer.smart

656 posts

227 months

Thursday 24th August 2023
quotequote all
Does bore score manifest as progressively more oil consumption, or does it go from no signs to catastrophic failure?

I guess OP if the answer to this is progressive, I would live with it doing only small miles per year and know I would have opportunity to address it if oil consumption became high.

magic Monkey Dust

332 posts

52 months

Thursday 24th August 2023
quotequote all
When the dreaded bore scored I bit the bullet and had a rebuild. At the end of the day i have a great car which is future proofed. I much prefer it to my 991 and it cost the same as a 3 year old Kia hatchback to fix. Should see me out now.
people pay 40 grand for a hot golf and swallow 15k in depreciation without moaning.

c4sman

795 posts

170 months

Thursday 24th August 2023
quotequote all
If bore score doesn’t result in catastrophic failure which I don’t believe it does, the OPs mate has the option to keep driving and enjoying the car until it either starts using oil and becomes annoying, or starts making a ticking noise that impairs the enjoyment of the car, both of which may not happen while he owns it. At my age and expected ownership length I’d get it rebuilt by Hartech but that’s not necessarily the right decision for everyone’s circumstances.

MB140

4,637 posts

119 months

Thursday 24th August 2023
quotequote all
My 987.1 Cayman S.

Went from needing 1 litre oil once every 6000 miles to needing 1 litre very 300 miles in 6 months and 7000 miles useage.

Discombobulate

5,613 posts

202 months

Thursday 24th August 2023
quotequote all
magic Monkey Dust said:
When the dreaded bore scored I bit the bullet and had a rebuild. At the end of the day i have a great car which is future proofed. I much prefer it to my 991 and it cost the same as a 3 year old Kia hatchback to fix. Should see me out now.
people pay 40 grand for a hot golf and swallow 15k in depreciation without moaning.
Exactly what I did - along with an oversize to 4.1, new cats, exhaust, engine mounts, oil cooler, water and oil pump, suspension, coolant pipes etc etc.
Cost me a fortune but we love the car. It was always going to be a keeper and, 16 years in, it now drives like new.

johnny senna

4,073 posts

288 months

Thursday 24th August 2023
quotequote all
anonymous said:
[redacted]
So are DFI / 997.2 engines now thought to be vulnerable to bore score? And how come they’re more expensive to fix / rebuild than 997.1 engines?

IREvans

1,126 posts

138 months

Thursday 24th August 2023
quotequote all
bluetigerandy said:
On a borescope my friend's car (he is in his early 70s and not really an internet user) has signs of early scoring in cylinder 6. Its a 997.1 C2S. He had asked for it to be checked during a plug change.
Running well, needing no oil top ups between changes (approx 3000 miles). No external signs etc.
Has anyone had a car like this that has run well long term and not had things progress? Or when scoring starts is progression a certainty?
Thanks
I’ve done a borescope inspection on a 2008 Cayman 987 S 3.4. Minor score marks on cylinder 6. 6,000 miles and 12 months later and did another inspection. Compared images and it wasn’t noticeably worse. Oil consumption was below the normal stated value in the handbook, and there was no evidence of engine noise or piston slap at hot idle. I did an oil analysis both times, and metal content was just above the maximum threshold

bluetigerandy

Original Poster:

21 posts

71 months

Thursday 24th August 2023
quotequote all
IREvans said:
I’ve done a borescope inspection on a 2008 Cayman 987 S 3.4. Minor score marks on cylinder 6. 6,000 miles and 12 months later and did another inspection. Compared images and it wasn’t noticeably worse. Oil consumption was below the normal stated value in the handbook, and there was no evidence of engine noise or piston slap at hot idle. I did an oil analysis both times, and metal content was just above the maximum threshold
Some really helpful replies here so thank you everyone- but especially IREvans- I think this is exactly the sort of experience he was looking for. Please keep the thoughts coming.

flat6crocer

49 posts

26 months

Thursday 24th August 2023
quotequote all
anonymous said:
[redacted]
9A1 failure rate is a tiny fraction of M97 failure rate. Not remotely comparable. People forget that the early 9x7.2 cars are now nearly 15 years old (first 997.2 were late 2008). With 9x7.1 cars, they were chucking in new engines at scale under warranty from the get go.

When you have Hartech having to post online repeatedly because they can't find a borked one to do their development work, you know they aren't going pop with much frequency:

http://www.911uk.com/viewtopic.php?p=1644727

For the OP, think it's fair to say scoring can progress at different rates. Some can go 10s of thousands of miles slow getting worse, others can go from first signs of increasing oil consumption to knacker in well under 10k miles.

I think anecdotally it seems like the ones that fail at lower miles are the ones that fail fast.

ATM

19,925 posts

235 months

Thursday 24th August 2023
quotequote all
johnny senna said:
And how come they’re more expensive to fix / rebuild than 997.1 engines?
Because no one is doing it. With the m97 (from the 9x7 cars) there is a larger network of shops rebuilding these and using various different replacement liners which are of course being manufactured by another network of manufacturers. With the newer engine this network does not exist as it is either not required or not required yet.

GTRene

19,266 posts

240 months

Friday 25th August 2023
quotequote all
in the video's they speak of, watch out for to rich fuel (to much or how you say that) = wash away oil film

wrong cheap fuel = not good, only 98+ best stuf use!

many 'porsche' drivers seem to use the cheaper or 95+ octane or lower? or bio fuel, just stop that! lol, thats bad! and you are fooling yourself, cheap = using more fuel and more damage to your engine = way more expensive then you think you can save.

and use good engine oil, so you can use a second hand Porsche from say 4 other owners each choosing their own fuel, maybe the first one asked the dealer, or looked in the book, yes you can use bio added fuel... or Ron92/95? or with 10% bio? and used that for years, by the time another Porsche lover buys such Porsche it can already have the first signs, or just not... so best to use proper fuel, only the best and make sure the engine is properly adjusted, not running too rich, to avoid bore wash.

so you can postpone the major damage, some can drive many more miles with the right treatment I guess.

Discombobulate

5,613 posts

202 months

Saturday 26th August 2023
quotequote all
GTRene said:
in the video's they speak of, watch out for to rich fuel (to much or how you say that) = wash away oil film

wrong cheap fuel = not good, only 98+ best stuf use!

many 'porsche' drivers seem to use the cheaper or 95+ octane or lower? or bio fuel, just stop that! lol, thats bad! and you are fooling yourself, cheap = using more fuel and more damage to your engine = way more expensive then you think you can save.

and use good engine oil, so you can use a second hand Porsche from say 4 other owners each choosing their own fuel, maybe the first one asked the dealer, or looked in the book, yes you can use bio added fuel... or Ron92/95? or with 10% bio? and used that for years, by the time another Porsche lover buys such Porsche it can already have the first signs, or just not... so best to use proper fuel, only the best and make sure the engine is properly adjusted, not running too rich, to avoid bore wash.

so you can postpone the major damage, some can drive many more miles with the right treatment I guess.
Both may help. But it's a design / manufacturing flaw. Our first 997 was still on its factory oil, was only filled up with good fuel and run in and driven carefully and it needed a new engine at 7,500 miles.

IREvans

1,126 posts

138 months

Saturday 26th August 2023
quotequote all
GTRene said:
in the video's they speak of, watch out for to rich fuel (to much or how you say that) = wash away oil film

wrong cheap fuel = not good, only 98+ best stuf use!

many 'porsche' drivers seem to use the cheaper or 95+ octane or lower? or bio fuel, just stop that! lol, thats bad! and you are fooling yourself, cheap = using more fuel and more damage to your engine = way more expensive then you think you can save.

and use good engine oil, so you can use a second hand Porsche from say 4 other owners each choosing their own fuel, maybe the first one asked the dealer, or looked in the book, yes you can use bio added fuel... or Ron92/95? or with 10% bio? and used that for years, by the time another Porsche lover buys such Porsche it can already have the first signs, or just not... so best to use proper fuel, only the best and make sure the engine is properly adjusted, not running too rich, to avoid bore wash.

so you can postpone the major damage, some can drive many more miles with the right treatment I guess.
It’s a mechanical issue, and different fuel or engine oil will make next to no difference. The bore scoring will first occur when the oil film breaks down in the hottest cylinder, some believe after a heat soak event.

bluetigerandy

Original Poster:

21 posts

71 months

Saturday 26th August 2023
quotequote all
He's not used anything other than Shell V power and the oil is Mobil as recommended by Porsche (serviced at well respected indys). I suspect it's short journeys that have contributed to an oil film breakdown.