997.2 gt3rs

Author
Discussion

Digga

40,732 posts

286 months

isaldiri said:
Digga said:
ittle touches on the 4.0, like the entire front wings being made from carbon fibre by a small firm in the UK who usually build transatlantic racing yachts. There’s a lot of little things like that.
You've heard what I think of cf body panels right.....? Cf monocoque - great. Panels not so good as they er break. Splitters are just idiotic....
Cool though 'because race car'.

That aside, although the arc of 997 GT3 & RS cars, from the 7.1 to the 4.0 all share the same parts manual, there's some fairly meaty differences on both the 3.8 and 4.0 7.2 RS cars:

  • ball-jointed rear suspension
  • variocam no only on inlet, but also exhaust valves
  • wider track front & rear
  • dual intake airbox
A lot of these things would be possible to retro-fit, but not the variocam and engine internals.

griggsy2

Original Poster:

136 posts

283 months

Black and white one has FSH but only paperwork from 1 in 2020, i.e. no ability to really go through and understand much. Major service apparently in 2022 but again, not much to see.
Going to spend some time with the red and white one next week which is effectively 1 owner and will have RPM prep prior to sale. Feels chunky money for +20,000 miles but hard to guage market with only 2 cars out there.

PRO5T

4,311 posts

28 months

https://collectingcars.com/buy?query=GT3%20RS&...

Collecting Cars auction results, difficult to pin down any up to date numbers.

ChrisW.

6,491 posts

258 months

I drove all four of the 997.2RS cars ... 3.6, 3.8, 4.0 and 2RS ... the step up from the 3.6 to the 3.8 was noticeable, the step up to the 4.0 was more ... and the 2RS was just amazing, so easy to steer on the throttle.

All great cars in their own way ... but the .2 did bring in a lot of valuable changes, a shame about the centre-locks IMHO !

Edited by ChrisW. on Friday 5th July 22:03

isaldiri

19,055 posts

171 months

Digga said:
Cool though 'because race car'.

That aside, although the arc of 997 GT3 & RS cars, from the 7.1 to the 4.0 all share the same parts manual, there's some fairly meaty differences on both the 3.8 and 4.0 7.2 RS cars:

  • ball-jointed rear suspension
  • variocam no only on inlet, but also exhaust valves
  • wider track front & rear
  • dual intake airbox
A lot of these things would be possible to retro-fit, but not the variocam and engine internals.
The 4.0 does not have a wider track vs the 3.8rs. I’m rather certain about that.

The partially rose jointed rear suspension and linear springs are easily retrofittable and I’d encourage most 7.2 gt3s of any stripe to try those changes as they, to a very large degree, are responsible for the supposed ‘better handling’ of the 4.0.

The major difference is the engine as you say which would be a bit of a job to get a 3.8 to 4.0 capacity. Look the engine is pretty nice of course but the 3.8 is absolutely no slouch either. Again as I said the improvement in what the engine delivers is not the major factor in the 4.0 being that much more expensive and it is the numbered plate that is the main reason. And also similarly to other cars, the supposed factor that the 4.0 has over others seems to increase as a function of its pricing. Funny that….

Digga

40,732 posts

286 months

isaldiri said:
The 4.0 does not have a wider track vs the 3.8rs. I’m rather certain about that.
More I was implying the 3.8 RS and 4.0 RS have wider track than any of the other 997 GT cars.

PRO5T

4,311 posts

28 months



Here’s my engines dyno sheet from when Manthey sent it to get mapped-google translate below…




Look at the torque figure! Now I understand some saying the big engines change what they love about the mezger but it still revs and wails like a banshee.

And this is an engine still limited by the 996’s intake set up.

An official Porsche fully homolgated 4.0 must be an utterly wonderful thing to grab by the scruff of the neck in a little 997.

I can accept that a whole lot of value in the 4.0 is in the limited edition status but even if they’d made thousands and thousands of them it’d still command a premium.

I’d love one-Chris Harris’ old one is semi local to me (well, we use the same OPC) and I do believe it’s driven and used regularly. To heck with putting it on a pedestal or locking it away in a bubble.


Yellow491

2,966 posts

122 months

isaldiri said:
Digga said:
Cool though 'because race car'.

That aside, although the arc of 997 GT3 & RS cars, from the 7.1 to the 4.0 all share the same parts manual, there's some fairly meaty differences on both the 3.8 and 4.0 7.2 RS cars:

  • ball-jointed rear suspension
  • variocam no only on inlet, but also exhaust valves
  • wider track front & rear
  • dual intake airbox
A lot of these things would be possible to retro-fit, but not the variocam and engine internals.
The 4.0 does not have a wider track vs the 3.8rs. I’m rather certain about that.

The partially rose jointed rear suspension and linear springs are easily retrofittable and I’d encourage most 7.2 gt3s of any stripe to try those changes as they, to a very large degree, are responsible for the supposed ‘better handling’ of the 4.0.

The major difference is the engine as you say which would be a bit of a job to get a 3.8 to 4.0 capacity. Look the engine is pretty nice of course but the 3.8 is absolutely no slouch either. Again as I said the improvement in what the engine delivers is not the major factor in the 4.0 being that much more expensive and it is the numbered plate that is the main reason. And also similarly to other cars, the supposed factor that the 4.0 has over others seems to increase as a function of its pricing. Funny that….
I would say as said its the numbered plate that creates the extra shilling,the 3.8 is the better car in value.I could not tell the difference between the 3.8 and 4.0,the steering feel was still the poor feedback as ever sadly.

993rsr

3,463 posts

252 months

PRO5T said:


Here’s my engines dyno sheet from when Manthey sent it to get mapped-google translate below…




Look at the torque figure! Now I understand some saying the big engines change what they love about the mezger but it still revs and wails like a banshee.

And this is an engine still limited by the 996’s intake set up.

An official Porsche fully homolgated 4.0 must be an utterly wonderful thing to grab by the scruff of the neck in a little 997.

I can accept that a whole lot of value in the 4.0 is in the limited edition status but even if they’d made thousands and thousands of them it’d still command a premium.

I’d love one-Chris Harris’ old one is semi local to me (well, we use the same OPC) and I do believe it’s driven and used regularly. To heck with putting it on a pedestal or locking it away in a bubble.

Ansgar Wiesen is the manbow Did the mapping on my K440 conversion that Manthey built.

PRO5T

4,311 posts

28 months

993rsr said:
Ansgar Wiesen is the manbow Did the mapping on my K440 conversion that Manthey built.
Nice! More info needed!

993rsr

3,463 posts

252 months

PRO5T said:
993rsr said:
Ansgar Wiesen is the manbow Did the mapping on my K440 conversion that Manthey built.
Nice! More info needed!
Long gone sadly. Mk1 996 GT3 in Zanzibar red, Manthey 3.9, 996 cup tranmission with an 8:32 CW&P and shorter 5th and 6th, JRZ's etc. mega thing, pic going into Pouhon.

Then went to a 4.1 motor which ended up (not well) with Slippydiff who put a 997 Cup motor in it, now SRance is the custodian.

Edited by 993rsr on Friday 5th July 18:33


Edited by 993rsr on Friday 5th July 18:39

PRO5T

4,311 posts

28 months

993rsr said:
PRO5T said:
993rsr said:
Ansgar Wiesen is the manbow Did the mapping on my K440 conversion that Manthey built.
Nice! More info needed!
Long gone sadly. Mk1 996 GT3 in Zanzibar red, Manthey 3.9, 996 cup tranmission with an 8:32 CW&P and shorter 5th and 6th, JRZ's etc. mega thing, pic going into Pouhon.

Then went to a 4.1 motor which ended up (not well) with Slippydiff who put a 997 Cup motor in it, now SRance is the custodian.

Edited by 993rsr on Friday 5th July 18:33


Edited by 993rsr on Friday 5th July 18:39
Ah, that car! Famous on YouTube if you're researching 3.9 Manthey cars biggrin

Very similar spec to mine although when Manthey rebuilt the gearbox I'm pretty certain they stuck with the standard gear ratios-cup car diff and final drive though.

Bloody love this engine.

isaldiri

19,055 posts

171 months

PRO5T said:
....
An official Porsche fully homolgated 4.0 must be an utterly wonderful thing to grab by the scruff of the neck in a little 997.

I can accept that a whole lot of value in the 4.0 is in the limited edition status but even if they’d made thousands and thousands of them it’d still command a premium.
Well..... it is a nice car for sure. I simply disagree that it's extra 'specialness' is in any way fairly or reasonably reflected by current pricing over the 3.8rs and the original difference between list prices was a much fairer reflection of how much better the 4.0 actually is. And if 'thousands and thousands' of the 4.0 were made and it never carries the cachet of a numbered car, the 3.8rs would be the one with a larger premium as it would have far less production numbers.

LaSource

2,625 posts

211 months

Saturday
quotequote all
isaldiri said:
You've heard what I think of cf body panels right.....? Cf monocoque - great. Panels not so good as they er break. Splitters are just idiotic....
I’ve got a spare 4.0 front wing somewhere in the garage - in case we end up needing it eek

LaSource

2,625 posts

211 months

Saturday
quotequote all
The JZM white/black car is one I owned before.

It was factory delivered in that colour scheme via some exclusive options. Notice it has a white cage which none of the standard trims which Nurburgsingh listed came with.

It is a high spec car - PCCBs, dynamic lights, cgt seats, lift, etc. Doesn’t have stitched/alcantara dash but does have some white trim (inc vents and centre tunnel) that set off well against the other white bits.


I believe it is the only factory white/black car. There was another in the UK but that was a post delivery job with a typical black or red cage - likely reverted to its original scheme now.


I really liked the JZM car in how it drove. I had a grey/red one after it - lower mileage, folding buckets, etc - but that just didn’t drive as nicely as the white one.


The JZM car was a good car whilst I had it - clean no stories, warranty etc. I didn’t understand the OPs point about limited history.


I find it tempting to buy again…but alas, other priorities. Plus each time I look at these I get lost in a rabbit hole of comparing 997.2 991.1 991.2 GT3s and RSs all at similar ish prices with different track performance levels!



Edited by LaSource on Saturday 6th July 07:48

Digga

40,732 posts

286 months

Saturday
quotequote all
LaSource said:
The JZM white/black car is one I owned before.

It was factory delivered in that colour scheme via some exclusive options. Notice it has a white cage which none of the standard trims which Nurburgsingh listed came with.

It is a high spec car - PCCBs, dynamic lights, cgt seats, lift, etc. Doesn’t have stitched/alcantara dash but does have some white trim (inc vents and centre tunnel) that set off well against the other white bits.


I believe it is the only factory white/black car. There was another in the UK but that was a post delivery job with a typical black or red cage - likely reverted to its original scheme now.


I really liked the JZM car in how it drove. I had a grey/red one after it - lower mileage, folding buckets, etc - but that just didn’t drive as nicely as the white one.


The JZM car was a good car whilst I had it - clean no stories, warranty etc. I didn’t understand the OPs point about limited history.


I find it tempting to buy again…but alas, other priorities. Plus each time I look at these I get lost in a rabbit hole of comparing 997.2 991.1 991.2 GT3s and RSs all at similar ish prices with different track performance levels!



Edited by LaSource on Saturday 6th July 07:48
I did know it was yours before but I didn’t want to ‘out’ you on here. biggrin

It’s interesting what you say about the difference between the two, and then also what Yellow 491 always says about his 3.8 disappointing slightly.

I bet a 3.8 on a decent set of KW’s or Ohlins might be the answer I am looking for.

Yellow491

2,966 posts

122 months

Saturday
quotequote all
993rsr said:
PRO5T said:
993rsr said:
Ansgar Wiesen is the manbow Did the mapping on my K440 conversion that Manthey built.
Nice! More info needed!
Long gone sadly. Mk1 996 GT3 in Zanzibar red, Manthey 3.9, 996 cup tranmission with an 8:32 CW&P and shorter 5th and 6th, JRZ's etc. mega thing, pic going into Pouhon.

Then went to a 4.1 motor which ended up (not well) with Slippydiff who put a 997 Cup motor in it, now SRance is the custodian.

Edited by 993rsr on Friday 5th July 18:33


Edited by 993rsr on Friday 5th July 18:39
That bean can was one of the best cars i have ever just jumped into and drove when we were on that lemans track day,steering and feel was wicked,where has it all gone wrong!

Digga i think that is a good starter for 10,i never modified mine at all bar geo,they still look good.

Digga

40,732 posts

286 months

Saturday
quotequote all
Yellow491 said:
That bean can was one of the best cars i have ever just jumped into and drove when we were on that lemans track day,steering and feel was wicked,where has it all gone wrong!
Like I said earlier in thread, there’s just something so pure and ‘right’ about the 996 GT3.

How about the 992 GT3 though? You enjoying it so far aren’t you?
Yellow491 said:
Digga i think that is a good starter for 10,i never modified mine at all bar geo,they still look good.
Isaldri has put better shocks on his 4.0 and reckons there’s a definite improvement.

griggsy2

Original Poster:

136 posts

283 months

Saturday
quotequote all
Hi LaSource, thanks for posting!
Would be great to know when you had the car and for how long and if you know any of the other owner's. Feel free to message me if easier.

My point re the service records is that there is no paperwork accompanying the stamps so I can’t see what was done/replaced in addition to the normal service to build that view of history. I had a manual 430 a while back which was similar but had comfort through buying via a Ferrari dealer with 2 year warranty. I then spent some time calling around to get copies of its history sent to me.

PRO5T

4,311 posts

28 months

Saturday
quotequote all
Yellow491 said:
That bean can was one of the best cars i have ever just jumped into and drove when we were on that lemans track day,steering and feel was wicked,where has it all gone wrong!

Digga i think that is a good starter for 10,i never modified mine at all bar geo,they still look good.


If anyone sees me at a track and wants a go, pop over and say hello-everyone should experience it once biggrin

As above, Manthey 3.9 engine, JRZ remote dampers, Geo to PARR Nürburgring set up, Cup final drive, Cup diff, 4.0 clutch and Cup lightweight flywheel, Cup gearshift cables, Cup aero (body and underneath), solid engine and gearbox mounts, performance friction steel brake conversion, the list goes on…

It’s currently stripped out with full cage (factory Clubsport originally) but I’m half in the mind to put the carpets back in this winter when it’s off the road and do an interior restoration-get rid of the tinted rear windows etc.

It’ll still be light, all the airbags, stereo and speakers are removed and it’s just running a carbon Cup footwell board.