"The death of internal combustion"

"The death of internal combustion"

Author
Discussion

Diabolik

Original Poster:

1,222 posts

168 months

Thursday 3rd February 2011
quotequote all
Just an article I came across...

Suck, squeeze, bang, bust; the death of internal combustion

I think alot of what he says is true, though I don't know how soon as engines are always getting more efficient.

Thoughts?

kambites

68,427 posts

228 months

Thursday 3rd February 2011
quotequote all
As has been discussed on here before, ICE efficiency is up against the laws of physics - with a steel block, the theoretical limit is about 37% efficient (see the Carnot Cycle) and even that's not really achievable if the engine is driving the wheels directly. Advances can improve other areas of a car's economy (aerodynamics, weight reduction, regenerative braking, etc.) but those would typically equally apply to cars with any other method of propulsion.

I think internal combustion engines probably have some way to go yet, if nothing else because there isn't really a viable alternative yet for some applications, but I doubt they'll be directly driving the wheels for very long and ultimately I suppose they'll vanish altogether.

vescaegg

27,106 posts

174 months

Thursday 3rd February 2011
quotequote all
cut through pictures are cool smile

thinfourth2

32,414 posts

211 months

Thursday 3rd February 2011
quotequote all
2 points

1 who cares what powers 95% of the cars out there as they are quite frankly fking dull.

2 These things

are toys not museum pieces and can be found in many places