Sitting wide without overtaking

Sitting wide without overtaking

Author
Discussion

havoc

Original Poster:

30,665 posts

240 months

Thursday 13th January 2011
quotequote all
Why???

I'm seeing increasing numbers of idiots sitting right on the back of a truck or slow-moving car, sitting very wide (often on the centre-line), and yet they have no intention of overtaking. Very frustrating when on nice, wide A-roads...

Is this a development of the MLM?

Mazdarese

21,044 posts

192 months

Thursday 13th January 2011
quotequote all
havoc said:
Why???

I'm seeing increasing numbers of idiots sitting right on the back of a truck or slow-moving car, sitting very wide (often on the centre-line), and yet they have no intention of overtaking. Very frustrating when on nice, wide A-roads...

Is this a development of the MLM?
Too scared to overtake, and to thick to drop back so that they can get a decent angle to see what's ahead of the truck.

Generally mongery, as usual.

adycav

7,615 posts

222 months

Thursday 13th January 2011
quotequote all
They think that they should probably overtake but they daren't.

Flash your lights at 'em, whilst furiously gesticulating to the left and mouthing 'move over'.

Then blast past them shaking your head and fist.

nuts

JonnyFive

29,502 posts

194 months

Thursday 13th January 2011
quotequote all
I actually sit one side or the other of the lane usually rather than in the middle due to my MX5 being so low I can't even see past normal cars like Fiestas and stuff, so sitting slightly to the side means I can see past them at whats going on.

philip979

1,773 posts

220 months

Thursday 13th January 2011
quotequote all
err, surely it's a case of them establishing themselves for an overtake and making their intentions clear; whilst improving their forward visibility and assessing the suitablility of an overtake? Also allowing them to easily slot back in if deemed unsafe? Has its place IMO.

TommyBuoy

1,269 posts

172 months

Thursday 13th January 2011
quotequote all
JonnyFive said:
I actually sit one side or the other of the lane usually rather than in the middle due to my MX5 being so low I can't even see past normal cars like Fiestas and stuff, so sitting slightly to the side means I can see past them at whats going on.
I know what you mean, I like to see what is going on ahead of the car directly infront of me but can't overtake, usually only trucks stop my view though. To be fair if there is someone more eager behind me I'll drop back in so they can overtake.

Plus I pay my road tax so I'll drive on whatever bit of the road I chose! tongue out

soad

33,311 posts

181 months

Thursday 13th January 2011
quotequote all
Mazdarese said:
Too scared to overtake, and to thick to drop back so that they can get a decent angle to see what's ahead of the truck.
This!

BDR529

3,560 posts

179 months

Thursday 13th January 2011
quotequote all
TommyBuoy said:


Plus I pay my road tax so I'll drive on whatever bit of the road I chose! tongue out
As someone caught drifting around the A4069 hairpin once said..
"I'm just making the most of my road tax officer!" hehe

havoc

Original Poster:

30,665 posts

240 months

Thursday 13th January 2011
quotequote all
philip979 said:
err, surely it's a case of them establishing themselves for an overtake and making their intentions clear; whilst improving their forward visibility and assessing the suitablility of an overtake? Also allowing them to easily slot back in if deemed unsafe? Has its place IMO.
Agreed...if there was oncoming traffic or a hazard. But when there's neither, it falls into the "general f**kwittery" category, and i'm seeing far too much of it.

Re: the visibility comment - move back then, unless it's the situation above. I follow too many people nowadays whose bonnets must look like "join-the-dots" negatives, given how close they permanently sit to the o/s/r of trucks...




PS - It's especially annoying when it's a wide-enough road to overtake safely while there's oncoming traffic (main trunk roads), as you get these people heading towards you forcing you to abort a perfectly reasonable overtake "just in case" they move out another couple of feet...

WeirdNeville

5,998 posts

220 months

Thursday 13th January 2011
quotequote all
If done properly, This:
philip979 said:
err, surely it's a case of them establishing themselves for an overtake and making their intentions clear; whilst improving their forward visibility and assessing the suitablility of an overtake? Also allowing them to easily slot back in if deemed unsafe? Has its place IMO.
If done improperly, they're either too close, too scared or adopting our eurpoean cousins style of "Slipstream" overtaking.

I've done it "properly" on many occasion, sometimes moving over 3-4 times before I get a "safe" overtake. On one occasion it's provoked a negative reaction from someone up ahead - he moved out to "block" me - which was a useful indicator that attempting an overtake past him wouldn't be particularly wise, so I hung back.

It's a useful skil lto add to the repertoir when done well.

LukeBird

17,170 posts

214 months

Thursday 13th January 2011
quotequote all
Mazdarese said:
Too scared to overtake
This in most cases I reckon.

I overtook someone doing this the other day (and the truck in front of them! wink) and when I pulled passed I glanced across to see a terrified woman (early 30s at a guess) clinging onto the steering wheel for dear life.
I don't think she had any idea how to overtake to be honest...