[Flamesuit on] Rover 200 BRM...

[Flamesuit on] Rover 200 BRM...

Author
Discussion

Chris71

Original Poster:

21,545 posts

247 months

Saturday 1st January 2011
quotequote all
I find myself with a sudden inexplicable urge to get a Rover 200 BRM. Has anyone on here actually had any experience with them?

Dift

1,624 posts

232 months

Saturday 1st January 2011
quotequote all
No experience of them, but saw one today at the bottom of my road...

Lovely smile

y2blade

56,201 posts

220 months

Saturday 1st January 2011
quotequote all
shout poledriver

NiceCupOfTea

25,305 posts

256 months

Saturday 1st January 2011
quotequote all
Have had a good sniff round a couple, my brother had a 216 of the same vintage and I had a Rover 25.

Underrated cars IMHO. Vastly overpriced at the time, but a real bargain now - I understand they handle very nicely, LSD, air con on some, lovely quilted leather tart's handbag interior, and I like the orange snout.

145 bhp as standard, 160 with a simple throttle body swap.

Make sure it's been well serviced and be wary of crap head gasket jobs.

Would love one as a daily hack!

poo at Paul's

14,312 posts

180 months

Saturday 1st January 2011
quotequote all
Brilliant little cars if you can get a good one.

Great revvy engine, and with LSD and well tweaked suspension, a suprisingly fun thing to bomb about in.

Watch for rusty arches, obviously head gasket needs to be sound, back boxes rust out, so most have been replaced with rather fruity souning janspeed systems, and rear claipers on the R200 last about 2-3 years!

But comfy, good build quality, (vastly better than the MG ZRs IME) decent kit on it (aircon is rare but if you can get one with aircon and sunroof, it's got everything a modern hatch has really, more if you like sunroofs!).
Stock wheels can be a pain, lose pressure due to corrosion on the beads, but a ful powder refurb cures it, although the 16 inch tyres mean fewer options, so consider a set of 17's to run about on, (does not seem to kill the ride too much).
Oh and two essential cheapish mods are the 52mil ally throttle body, (placcy one sticks and most have been upgraded), plus, IMO essential to have MAgnecor race leads on the K series to get over all the starting problems you can get on stock leads. I had problems from new on mine for 10k miles, then dealer swapped to Magnecor race leads and they lasted to at least 130k when I got rid of it.


Get as good a one as you can, they are then a great fun and pretty cheap to run, rare little hatch, and best of all a proper British car!!

PoleDriver

28,748 posts

199 months

Saturday 1st January 2011
quotequote all
I've had one for a couple of years. The only good version of the 200 IMHO.
In the first 6 months I wanted to drive it over Beachy Head. Head gasket failure, bottom end failure and a couple of nurst hoses.
Since these were sorted it's been brilliant!
Quite good performance. Comfortable. great retro interior. Did not put a foot wrong in the snow and ice (thanks to LSD and good driving skills! smile) Cheap to run. Parts still available.

Check out http://www.thebrm.co.uk/

PM me if you want to know anything about the cars!

NiceCupOfTea

25,305 posts

256 months

Saturday 1st January 2011
quotequote all
Poley, the 200vi had the same engine (different gearbox ratios though and no LSD) and was better setup than the standard 200s - not a bad steer!

Rover 25 GTi is also worth a shout.

jon-

16,525 posts

221 months

Saturday 1st January 2011
quotequote all
PoleDriver said:
The only good version of the 200 IMHO.
Aw, I used to love my ZR frown

PoleDriver

28,748 posts

199 months

Saturday 1st January 2011
quotequote all
jon- said:
PoleDriver said:
The only good version of the 200 IMHO.
Aw, I used to love my ZR frown
Bet it didn't have an orange grille and red leather interior though! biggrin

Chris71

Original Poster:

21,545 posts

247 months

Saturday 1st January 2011
quotequote all
Sounds interesting. Might even be a possible future purchase... all the makings of a fun little car, plus a few creature comforts (leather, AC etc.) and a pleasingly leftfield alternative to the usual GTi-6s and Civics.

PoleDriver

28,748 posts

199 months

Saturday 1st January 2011
quotequote all
Chris71 said:
Sounds interesting. Might even be a possible future purchase... all the makings of a fun little car, plus a few creature comforts (leather, AC etc.) and a pleasingly leftfield alternative to the usual GTi-6s and Civics.
Exactly the reason I bought it!

jon-

16,525 posts

221 months

Saturday 1st January 2011
quotequote all
PoleDriver said:
jon- said:
PoleDriver said:
The only good version of the 200 IMHO.
Aw, I used to love my ZR frown
Bet it didn't have an orange grille and red leather interior though! biggrin
Blue part leather and an engine that fell out biggrin

Welshbeef

49,633 posts

203 months

Saturday 1st January 2011
quotequote all
Daily hack... Boy are we at the real bottom end of the Market here.

HGF, very dated looks, long stopping distance, even low power tdis are notably quicker.

Surely you'd be much better off getting a Clio sport 172 much faster l
better stopping distance air con STD great handling. Cheap too.

Guess if we used cheese and said the brm was like red Leicester but the Clio sport was rockfourt. Only one winner in that competition and frankly id say nose may decide to put the red Leicester into the bin

MGJohn

10,203 posts

188 months

Saturday 1st January 2011
quotequote all
One of my son's cars is the 200vi ... with the VVC engine. Similar car but less obvious profile unlike the BRM. Do not drive it much but, enjoy doing so occasionally. That little 200vi flies.... Looks like just another 200 Rover ... which it is and that's the way I like it.
..

PoleDriver

28,748 posts

199 months

Saturday 1st January 2011
quotequote all
Welshbeef said:
Long stopping distance,
Fitting Rover600/800 brakes is a very simple and cheap mod and makes an amazing difference!

poo at Paul's

14,312 posts

180 months

Saturday 1st January 2011
quotequote all
Nowt wrong with the brakes on mine. Owned for 10 years from new and did 140k miles.

Far better driving position that my clio 182, and a nicer interior. On road, I prefered the BRM handling too. And the motor whilst losing a few ponies, (mine had full janspeed and 52mil tb / ITG filter so was nudging 160hp), it was just as quick up to "normal" fast road speeds. Gearing was great, at 50mph on main roads, you could drop to 2nd to overtake, as it would pull about 75mph in 2nd, then very close ratios up to 5th!

When you consider you can get a nice one for £1500, great retro looks, great engine, lightweight, comfy, I reckon they are a real bargain. Keep it in decent nick and hwo much cash can you lose? Getting rarer by the day.

Welshbeef

49,633 posts

203 months

Sunday 2nd January 2011
quotequote all
Honest opinion it's about as collectsble and desirable as a Metro GTi. Enough said.

r11co

6,244 posts

235 months

Sunday 2nd January 2011
quotequote all
Welshbeef said:
Honest opinion it's about as collectsble and desirable as a Metro GTi. Enough said.
Idiot.

Nuff said.

Twincam16

27,646 posts

263 months

Sunday 2nd January 2011
quotequote all
Mentioned in this month's Practical Classics and, given that they're so rare and cheap and provide so much performance for the money, worth buying and keeping as they can't get much cheaper.

The way cycles of fashion go, once the current '80s nostalgia bug has passed, rare '90s classics are going to be highly desirable IMHO.

Mr GrimNasty

8,172 posts

175 months

Sunday 2nd January 2011
quotequote all
The thing is, a car has to be desirable but unobtainable (to most) in its era, to become a desirable nostalgic classic later. No-one I know lusted after one of these!



Edited by Mr GrimNasty on Sunday 2nd January 13:27