Melling Wildcat competition
Discussion
tvrtim said:
I am confused.
The second comp has been won,total of 3663 components.
The third competition seems to be asking the same question.
Please can somone explain?
Maybe they added some bits to it??The second comp has been won,total of 3663 components.
The third competition seems to be asking the same question.
Please can somone explain?
I foresee yet more Trouble.
I presume I wasn't included in the second "draw", then? It would have been nice to know which competition my £20 was included in.hornetrider said:
LeeThePeople said:
Another winner thats local, looks well dodgy to me.
Link?http://www.almellingsportscars.com/win.htm
Competition Page said:
Second competition result
The winning number is 3663 and the winner of the game with the nearest number is 3668.
The winner with 3668 is a gentleman from Oldham, Lancashire who has chosen to exercise his legal right to remain anonymous.
I'm sorry but it does sound well dodgy, I certainly don't have the faith in the transparency of the process to enter.The winning number is 3663 and the winner of the game with the nearest number is 3668.
The winner with 3668 is a gentleman from Oldham, Lancashire who has chosen to exercise his legal right to remain anonymous.
So... how does the draw work? I thought they wait until they sell 2000 tickets then enter them in a draw, then sell another 2000 and enter them in the next draw, etc.
But here - the number drawn didn't win the prize - they picked the nearest number?? How are we to know if there aren't two 'nearest numbers'?
Sounds bent as a nine bob note to me.
hornetrider said:
But here - the number drawn didn't win the prize - they picked the nearest number?? How are we to know if there aren't two 'nearest numbers'?
It wasn't a number drawn in this competition. You had to guess how many components were in a Wildcat.Interesting page, that competition one. Where's the second prize come from all of a sudden?
Ribol said:
10 Pence Short said:
Ribol said:
To be fair what a great way of shifting something that isn't selling otherwise in this current climate.
Fair play to him for coming up with the idea.
Only if the way it is done is fair, transparent and, of course, legal.Fair play to him for coming up with the idea.

It just appears that they were in such a hurry to get the idea off the ground they didn't put enough thought into getting the transparency sorted properly.
hornetrider said:
Competition Page said:
Second competition result
The winning number is 3663 and the winner of the game with the nearest number is 3668.
The winner with 3668 is a gentleman from Oldham, Lancashire who has chosen to exercise his legal right to remain anonymous.
I'm sorry but it does sound well dodgy, I certainly don't have the faith in the transparency of the process to enter.The winning number is 3663 and the winner of the game with the nearest number is 3668.
The winner with 3668 is a gentleman from Oldham, Lancashire who has chosen to exercise his legal right to remain anonymous.
So... how does the draw work? I thought they wait until they sell 2000 tickets then enter them in a draw, then sell another 2000 and enter them in the next draw, etc.
But here - the number drawn didn't win the prize - they picked the nearest number?? How are we to know if there aren't two 'nearest numbers'?
Sounds bent as a nine bob note to me.
I had thought of entering this time, but wasnt hugely convinced.
Gassing Station | General Gassing [Archive] | Top of Page | What's New | My Stuff


