RE: Performance Link Mazda MX-5 R300 | UK Review
RE: Performance Link Mazda MX-5 R300 | UK Review
Sunday 9th March

Performance Link Mazda MX-5 R300 | UK Review

Not ready for a battery-powered MX-5 just yet? How about one with an 8,000rpm, 300hp Honda K24...


Perhaps the best thing about the MX-5 is that it can be a blank canvas for you to create your dream roadster. Mazda provides some great core ingredients - low mass evenly distributed, rear-wheel drive, double wishbones all round, a brilliant manual - onto which owners can add however much spice and flavour they desire. It’s been this way for 35 years, and will hopefully continue for as long as there are examples to build on. Because there’s little more glorious on a sunny day than a well-modified MX-5. 

The aftermarket caters to allcomers, from those who want a little extra pep from a manifold and a remap to the full-on Rocketeer restomod. But there’s one engine swap that hasn’t happened yet, and it’s one of the best-known of them all: the K swap. When special k doesn’t mean ketamine or your Mum’s cereal, it’s the Honda K Series. Google K Series now and it’s the Wikipedia entry for the Honda engines that comes up first rather than the Rover ones. Begin typing ‘Honda K’ and the second suggested search is ‘Honda K swap’, so prevalent has it become to drop a Civic Type R or Accord Type S engine in. We’ve seen K-powered Lotus Elises, MG Midgets, Honda Jazzes… the Ariel Nomad of course had K24 power. And now we have the first right-hand-drive Mazda MX-5 with a Honda K engine in

Performance Link had the idea floating around for a while; turns out KPower in the US did as well. Between them, they have figured out the details for making a Honda 2.4 live where a 2.0-litre Duratec once did. While only compatible with the NC for now, they are working on an ND conversion. The K24 sits on bespoke subframes to get it low enough (while reasonably short, it’s a tall engine) though Alex from PL suggests that very little additional modification is required to make it fit. The standard Mazda five-speed is retained, albeit with an adapter plate, lighter flywheel and cryogenic strengthening (literally plunging it into minus 200) to deal with the extra welly. A Haltech ECU keeps everything ticking along as intended; you can see the full list of parts here, the engine essentially rebuilt with a port and polish as the extra goodies are going in. The important news is that with even naughtier cams, new manifolds, better fuelling and a greedier intake, this is a 300hp, 2.4-litre, naturally aspirated, 8,200rpm MX-5. With a red rocker cover. 

The car you see has been built with customer track use in mind, and is therefore pretty hardcore, though of course future commissions could be specced as you like if you'd prefer something more fast road biased. This one has Meister R GT1 coilovers, wider wheels and tyres, a two-way limited-slip diff, Carbotech discs, pads and fluid, a lowered floor with bucket seats and an exhaust straight from Super GT. If your VTEC goes ‘bwarrrrp’, this VTEC goes ‘BWARRRRRRP!’. At half the revs. It’s loud alright. 

That being said, the advantage of a K24 swap rather than the 2.0-litre K20 is a lick of extra torque from the additional swept capacity. So despite the look and the sound and a rev limiter that’s literally beyond the red paint of the standard tacho, the Performance Link car is relatively easy to bimble around in. There’s no need to chase loads of revs to get meaningful performance from it; if not offering forced induction levels of shove (or probably even 3.0-litre V6 amounts), it feels usefully stronger than any naturally aspirated 2.0-litre MX5 previously has by a margin, and all the time. 

Plus, of course, no MX-5 of any stripe has responded like this to revs - or sounded quite so exhilarating in the process. This has always been the appeal of a K swap (along with the durability and relative affordability), and seldom has it been better demonstrated than in an MX-5. Because with bum on the floor, road stretching ahead and wind ruffling past, nothing feels or sounds quite so good as a Honda VTEC climbing on cam around 6,000rpm and screaming its heart out like a super touring car to more than eight grand. The timbre of a K Series remains instantly identifiable, the sound raw and fierce but with proper musicality to it as well. However good four-cylinder MX-5s have been made to sound, they’ve never howled, gargled and honked like this. 

If the top end perhaps isn’t quite as rabid as the K20 or F20 Honda engines, the K24 is still insatiably energetic in its upper reaches. And you’d happily trade a bit of 9,000rpm fizz for everyday torque. It’s seriously quick as well; your eyes tend to stay fixed on the rev counter rather than the speedo, and while there are always more revs to go the speed is often higher than it ought to be. Such is five-speed life; a six-speed feels like a must for anyone thinking of a K24 swap, to get more revs more of the time. 

As for the rest of this overhaul, it’s pretty extreme. The exhaust booms, the intake is wild, the brakes can snatch and the suspension is unapologetic. As it should be: this is built to embarrass M cars on track, something we’re assured it’s very good at. And there’s undoubtedly fun to have on the road, not least because the Meister Rs lend a layer of polish to the ride not normally found, and turn-in on the wider rubber is laser sharp. Any hint of slack has been eradicated, and if the brakes need some temp to work best then that's the perfect excuse to brake later and harder. Having the driver sit lower on a racier seat, grasping a proper steering wheel, works wonders for the sense of connection with the MX-5 as well. If the Midnight Club soundtrack from 4,000rpm hadn’t done enough. 

Crucially, the engine swap hasn’t overwhelmed the MX-5. It doesn’t feel dominated or overawed by the Honda engine, and nor is it suddenly some ponderous rag top or muscle car roadster. As often happens with more power (and some decent supporting mods) in these wonderful little cars, it actually broadens the handling scope even further. The inherent agility remains, complemented further by a keener front end and a rear axle that can be brought more easily into play. There’s even still some wobble through the chassis, for old time’s sake. The temptation would be to call the Performance Link car an amplified MX-5 experience because so many familiar traits remain, but truth be told it feels far more extreme than that - and all the better for it. 

Of course, if you want a usefully faster MX-5 that feels like it’s come from the factory, you already know who to call. If you want a modern take on a 3.0-litre Healey, speak to Rocketeer. But if you want a sports car that feels like it’s just set a time attack record at Tsukuba, Performance Link takes the biscuit. Clearly something this intense wouldn’t suit consistent regular road use, but that engine is captivating and the perfect fit for a more raucous MX-5 experience. Its voracious appetite for revs, generous power and stunning soundtrack would surely provide entertainment for a long while yet. Shame Honda themselves never made a sports car this good, really (that is an S2000 gag, for avoidance of doubt). 

With the first couple of cars now nearing completion, Alex and the team at Performance Link are still finalising costs. But he reckons that if you arrived at HQ with nothing but £30k and three months to wait (i.e. without a donor car), he could give you something like this at the end as a complete build. The engine swap will be from £12k. So as with surely every modified MX-5 story ever, a familiar conundrum presents itself: while the driving experience more than justifies that amount, what other people will see - and what you will see from the driver’s seat - is an old MX-5 that doesn’t seem to be worth that much. ‘Twas ever thus.

Those thinking about a Boxster for £30k or trying to speculate on an S2000 probably won’t be won over by this. But for anyone who likes the idea of Caterham thrills with a bit more usability, who grew up learning about (and loving) wild Japanese tuner cars, or who is merely intrigued by an NC MX-5 with twice the power - and a whole lot more revs - should absolutely speak to Performance Link. A K24 swapped into an MX-5 may have taken a while, but it’s absolutely as good as we hoped. Yo indeed.  


SPECIFICATION | MAZDA MX-5 NC 2.0 (PERFORMANCE LINK R300)

Engine: 2,354cc, four-cyl (1,999cc, four-cyl standard)
Transmission: 5-speed manual, rear-wheel drive
Power (hp): 160@7,000rpm (standard, now c.300)
Torque (lb ft): 139@5,000rpm (standard, now c. 200)
0-62mph: 7.6 secs (standard, now c. five seconds)
Top speed: 132mph (standard, now c. 160mph)
Weight: 1,115kg (standard)
MPG: 38.2 (standard)
CO2: 177g/km (standard)
Price: £see text

Author
Discussion

georgeyboy12345

Original Poster:

3,948 posts

51 months

Saturday 8th March
quotequote all
Oof! Suits you sir! Near perfect car as far as I’m concerned

wistec1

633 posts

57 months

Saturday 8th March
quotequote all
Like it.. But as stated it's best suited and set up for track use, So far so good but it's very noisy and boomy so I wonder if it would pass the we trackside sound test?

Performance Link UK

16 posts

121 months

Saturday 8th March
quotequote all
yes.

We can build these cars to a variety of specifications, this is about as raw as you can get but it’s designed to go hard at the track all day and drive it home.

We offer a more customised experience so if a customer wants K power but with more road biased civility we can do that.

alfa-alex

90 posts

68 months

Saturday 8th March
quotequote all
Was the road test review for this done on Thursday morning?!
If so I saw the car (briefly!) and thought to myself it made a great noise!

edoverheels

480 posts

121 months

Saturday 8th March
quotequote all
I love the idea and modified MX5s are hard to beat for fun at any price but is there really room for this? With Rocketeer and BBR, let alone S2000s.
I am biased but if you have a Honda engine going spare and need a track car I think it should go in the back of an Elise.
Get an old Elise and go and see Maidstone Sportscars

griffdude

1,872 posts

264 months

Saturday 8th March
quotequote all
If you need noise in an NC, just fit ITBs / if you need power fit a rotrex SC.

Performance Link UK

16 posts

121 months

Saturday 8th March
quotequote all
edoverheels said:
I love the idea and modified MX5s are hard to beat for fun at any price but is there really room for this? With Rocketeer and BBR, let alone S2000s.
I am biased but if you have a Honda engine going spare and need a track car I think it should go in the back of an Elise.
Get an old Elise and go and see Maidstone Sportscars
Thanks for your feedback Sadly the cost of used Lotus cars has got a bit crazy, we appreciate this swap isn’t for everyone but this car has also had an entire strip back to bare chassis, all new bushings, new ARBs, brakes, suspension etc etc. It’s not just an engine swap.

It just means you can get very close to raw Caterham style thrills but then put the roof up and drive home, you’ve got a stereo, cruise control etc. If you have an incident on track a wing is £50, a bumper £200 a whole front end can be bought for less than £700.



Edited by Performance Link UK on Saturday 8th March 07:53

jinba-ittai

1,275 posts

226 months

Saturday 8th March
quotequote all
Seems pointless - an S2000 with the same engine mods and some suspension upgrades will be cheaper and better

Performance Link UK

16 posts

121 months

Saturday 8th March
quotequote all
alfa-alex said:
Was the road test review for this done on Thursday morning?!
If so I saw the car (briefly!) and thought to myself it made a great noise!
Indeed

Edited by Performance Link UK on Saturday 8th March 07:52

Performance Link UK

16 posts

121 months

Saturday 8th March
quotequote all
jinba-ittai said:
Seems pointless - an S2000 with the same engine mods and some suspension upgrades will be cheaper and better
Do the actual math on that and you’ll find it’s not even close unfortunately.




mooseracer

2,412 posts

186 months

Saturday 8th March
quotequote all
Performance Link UK said:
jinba-ittai said:
Seems pointless - an S2000 with the same engine mods and some suspension upgrades will be cheaper and better
Do the actual math on that and you’ll find it’s not even close unfortunately.
And regardless - there is this thing called choice, and isn't it wonderful

timgee

1 posts

161 months

Saturday 8th March
quotequote all
This is genius. I had a tuned NC with ITBs and much more and loved it...but it was a bit challenging on the reliability front so the thought of a K24 solution is massively appealing.
All the noise, revs and excitement but none of the stalling at low speeds, insane emissions and risk of failure.
I am going to check my lottery numbers.

Performance Link UK

16 posts

121 months

Saturday 8th March
quotequote all
griffdude said:
If you need noise in an NC, just fit ITBs / if you need power fit a rotrex SC.
Thanks for your feedback!

Max power for a 2.5 with ITBs is about 240hp. The SC delivers power in a completely different way. This car is about analogue NA power, nothing comes close to it in that regard.

Performance Link UK

16 posts

121 months

Saturday 8th March
quotequote all
timgee said:
This is genius. I had a tuned NC with ITBs and much more and loved it...but it was a bit challenging on the reliability front so the thought of a K24 solution is massively appealing.
All the noise, revs and excitement but none of the stalling at low speeds, insane emissions and risk of failure.
I am going to check my lottery numbers.
As the car runs a full Haltech ECU with canbus integration the car starts and drives like any OE car would.

ben5575

6,992 posts

237 months

Saturday 8th March
quotequote all
Phwoarrr.

As an ex owner of a a NA BBR turbo and several quick caterhams, this is about the perfect car for me. If someone had a ND2 would you be able to do a similar swap? #askingforafriend.

rossub

5,178 posts

206 months

Saturday 8th March
quotequote all
The idea of bringing over a mint low miler NC from Japan and dropping it off is certainly appealing.

Performance Link UK

16 posts

121 months

Saturday 8th March
quotequote all
ben5575 said:
Phwoarrr.

As an ex owner of a a NA BBR turbo and several quick caterhams, this is about the perfect car for me. If someone had a ND2 would you be able to do a similar swap? #askingforafriend.
The ND swap is well underway with our first initial deposits taken, if you would like more information please feel free to contact us via our website 👍🏻

BricktopST205

1,480 posts

150 months

Saturday 8th March
quotequote all
jinba-ittai said:
Seems pointless - an S2000 with the same engine mods and some suspension upgrades will be cheaper and better
You can have a Turbo'ed MK2.5 MX5 with around 250bhp for 5-10 grand and have 99% of the fun and at 30k you can get a GR86 which will be better dynamically than this and with a couple of bolt-ons will be similar in bhp/tonne too.

That said cars like this are always heart over mind and I am sure it is absolutely epic to drive and can be driven 24/7. Rag around a track all day and drive back home without a single tool chest in sight.



Performance Link UK

16 posts

121 months

Saturday 8th March
quotequote all
Yeah the £30k price tag is for a complete build where we strip the chassis to bare metal and every single components is replaced with new / upgraded. It’s a completely new car finished at that price with only the body panels really being original.

Performance Link UK

16 posts

121 months

Saturday 8th March
quotequote all
rossub said:
The idea of bringing over a mint low miler NC from Japan and dropping it off is certainly appealing.
Plus you’ll have the best taillights to ever grace the MX5!