RE: 2025 BMW M135 | UK Review

RE: 2025 BMW M135 | UK Review

Monday 11th November

2025 BMW M135 | UK Review

So if a Civic Type R or Golf R doesn't appeal, how about the 300hp 1 Series?


There were a lot of strange things going on in the summer of 2020, and on planet PH the weirdest of all was having a brand-new, 306hp BMW long termer around… that nobody was very interested in. The most interesting thing that could be said about the original M135i xDrive was being able to say that you were driving a red F40 around, thanks to BMW’s internal model designation for the first era of UKL2 1 Series. It was actually fine, with a smart interior and easy access interior, though once that badge gets on the back of a BMW - M Performance or otherwise - expectations are raised. And the M135i failed to meet them. Even when it was updated, in fact. 

But now there’s an M135 in the world (no longer with an i, because that creates confusion with the electric cars, but called F70) and it seems a lot more likely to be remembered - for good and bad reasons. It seems to be BMW tradition now that a 1 Series is launched that isn’t received brilliantly, only to be facelifted a few years down the line and made, to be frank, less appealing. It happened with the rear-drive F20 and it’s happened here again: the front of the car could be anything, despite the reprofiled kidney grilles, and the rear is just too busy - not helped by four exhausts. The old M135i xDrive never looked quite so smart as from the driver’s seat of this new one during a day in the Cotswolds. (UK pics haven’t yet been shot, so you’ll have to make do with these. But we’ve had a go, honest - the reg was YH74XGJ, and the B4035 is great.)

At least from the (slightly too high) driver’s seat you get to also take in a fantastic new interior. It’s a common criticism of more expensive BMWs that the driving environments aren’t different enough to cheaper models, but that’s great news for 1 Series drivers - because it feels million bucks. The interfaces are crisp, the displays beautiful, the integration of everything that’s mandatory for a new, expensive hot hatch very smart indeed. Having very recently tried the Mk8.5 Golf R, the Volkswagen simply isn’t in the same league for interior ambience. The BMW’s materials, colours and touchpoints - including the knurled volume dial, the drive mode themes and steering wheel buttons - are very good indeed. Some of the lower plastics aren’t quite so great, and it almost feels like a chunk of the dash has been deleted below the vents, yet it remains an impressive cabin. If your 1 Series can be parked side on then all will be well with the world. 

It’s interesting for a refresh that keeps the same engine to introduce a new transmission. Gone is the old eight-speed auto, replaced with a seven-speed DCT, and it’s definitely an improvement. For all the reasons that dual-clutches often improve on torque converters: shifts are faster, yes, but it’s also that immediacy higher up in the revs that marks it out. Which is where you’ll be in this car, as the ratios are short enough for second to be done by 50mph and third all out by 70mph. So having a gearbox that’s always responsive to the paddles is super beneficial as the limiter never feels far away. And there’s fun to be had zapping up and down the ratios, especially from a launch control start. Knowing that the gearbox is never going to get into a muddle encourages you to push on a bit harder, too. With a slightly over eager Sport mode for the transmission, it tends to be best in manual, or kept in Personal (what would have been Comfort) and then left to its own devices. Whichever way around, the dual-clutch is a useful improvement on the auto. Even the upshift farts are a tad more convincing. 

The engine itself, if also with its own slightly more authentic drawl, remains fairly ordinary. Potent enough, but unremarkable. Given the gains discovered with the related 3.0-litre B58 six-cylinder (this is a modular family of engines with 500cc cylinders; this is the 2.0-litre B48, and there’s a 1.5-litre B38 triple in Minis), it’s a shame that more than 300hp couldn’t be found somewhere. Especially with xDrive to harness it. Or maybe we should simply be glad of an engine at all. 

The chassis of the M135 feels better sorted than the M135i. The press material goes into a fair bit of detail about new dampers and increased rigidity and, to BMW’s credit, this is a more engaging hot hatch than the one that preceded it. There’s a bit more bite to turn in, better body control over testing tarmac, an increased willingness to, y’know, drive like a 300hp xDrive BMW. There’s not going to be much quicker down a bumpy B road; the 1 Series is still useful compact by modern standards, and, predictably, both traction and grip are first-rate. It would make a great police car: unflappable and mightily capable in all conditions. 

If that sounds a little like the previous generation Golf R then there's a good reason for that - but the similarity is both a blessing and a curse. Yes, the M135 is assured and able to reach a level most are ever going to need, yet it never really excites either. Without anything clever happening for the xDrive at either, there’s neither a particularly tenacious front end nor a flamboyant rear which tends to mark out the best all-wheel drive offerings currently available. The brake pedal is a bit long, too. And while the passive damping effort is very good at middling commitment levels, it doesn’t quite boast that mastery of control of the very best (see twin test). Which you sort of want for 1,600kg. So this is a better fast 1 Series, for sure, though not a radically transformed one. 

Some salvation may be at hand, however, with the M Dynamic Package, which brings lighter wheels, additional bracing, stickier tyres, damper tweaks, M3 brake pads and more. Sadly there wasn’t one to drive at the event, so perhaps one to try at a later date. It’s nice to see BMW trying, at least. 

Ultimately, without the additional advantage those tweaks may or may not bring, not enough has changed about the M135 to catapult it to the top of the hot hatch rankings. A lovely new interior, a dual-clutch transmission and a slightly more energetic chassis are welcome - but not transformative. It probably nudges the BMW ahead of the Mercedes-AMG A35, but with both Golf R and Audi S3 benefitting from some meaningful chassis changes for their latest refresh, they’d get the nod from us for fast, fun and four-wheel drive at this price point. Bring on that M Dynamic Package.


SPECIFICATION | 2025 BMW M135

Engine: 1,998cc, four-cylinder, turbocharged
Transmission: 7-speed dual-clutch auto, four-wheel drive
Power (hp): 300@5,750-6,500rpm
Torque (lb ft): 295@2,000-4,000rpm
0-62mph: 4.9 seconds
Top speed: 155mph
Weight: 1,550kg (DIN)
MPG: 36.7 (WLTP)
CO2: 175g/km (WLTP)
Price: £41,825 (price as standard; price as tested £53,665, comprising Heated steering wheel for £175, Electric bootlid for £390, M Sport package pro (M Sport Brakes with red calipers, BMW Individual Lights Shadow Line, M Sport seat belts, Front M sport seats) for £2,075, Panoramic glass roof for £1,050, Electric front seats and drive memory for £730, Split fold rear seats for £175 (!), Automatic air con for £480, Technology Plus Pack (Comfort Access, Folding wing mirrors with auto dimming, rear view mirror with auto dimming, adaptive LED lights, High beam assist, Parking assistant Plus, Head-up display, Storage for wireless charging, Live Cockpit Professional) for £2,750)

Author
Discussion

996GT3_Matt

Original Poster:

229 posts

211 months

Monday 11th November
quotequote all
Hyundai i30 with bad styling. I can’t understand what this offers over a Golf R or Civic.

juice

8,862 posts

289 months

Monday 11th November
quotequote all


I honestly thought that was a Focus.

otolith

59,041 posts

211 months

Monday 11th November
quotequote all
I had the 128ti as a courtesy car, which if this is BMW's Golf R, is BMW's Golf GTi. Boring.

QuattroDave

1,576 posts

135 months

Monday 11th November
quotequote all
It definitely lost its USP when it went from the F2x with the B58 and RWD to "could be any" car styling and "could be any car" engine and drivetrain.

I'm no golf fan but idrive aside this doesn't have anything better than either the golf or the focus.

Tindersticks

1,280 posts

7 months

Monday 11th November
quotequote all
Almost £54k as tested. Nope.

Jimjimhim

1,529 posts

7 months

Monday 11th November
quotequote all
Looks like a good car and for once it's a BMW that doesn't make me want to puke when I see it!

Heathwood

2,797 posts

209 months

Monday 11th November
quotequote all
That looks……okay. Nothing more, nothing less. No USP any more of course and £50k once spec’d.

GeniusOfLove

2,257 posts

19 months

Monday 11th November
quotequote all
juice said:


I honestly thought that was a Focus.
Looks more like a not quite as well resolved rip off of the 2012 Volvo V40 to me. Obviously without the genuine quality and longevity of the Volvo, it is a BMW after all so will be a chain rattling oil burning/leaking coolant pissing mess by the time it's 10 years old.

I've just been talking to a friend in the US about a £66k Corvette and I see a review of this gimp mobile for £10k less once you spec it not to have windy windows at a mono AM radio.

It really is depressing what passes as a "performance car" on this side of the Atlantic.

Edited by GeniusOfLove on Monday 11th November 18:32

sutts

926 posts

155 months

Monday 11th November
quotequote all
Surprised and irrationally disappointed that one of the few remaining USP’s of the genuine M cars - four exhaust outlets - has now been carried over to the four cylinder junior badge-engineered models.

otolith

59,041 posts

211 months

Monday 11th November
quotequote all
sutts said:
Surprised and irrationally disappointed that one of the few remaining USP’s of the genuine M cars - four exhaust outlets - has now been carried over to the four cylinder junior badge-engineered models.
Meh. It always was cosmetic.

Deessee

42 posts

146 months

Monday 11th November
quotequote all
Hatchback where you have to pay £175 to fold a back seat down. Ffs. As has been said, £54k (though that is with a bunch of stuff you don’t actually need) no USP, generic looks and an exhaust for each cylinder. Hard pass.

N.B. At base price it’s roughly the same as a 2014 model, adjusted for inflation. That had the B58 though…

Jimjimhim

1,529 posts

7 months

Monday 11th November
quotequote all
GeniusOfLove said:
juice said:


I honestly thought that was a Focus.
Looks more like a not quite as well resolved rip off of the 2012 Volvo V40 to me. Obviously without the genuine quality and longevity of the Volvo, it is a BMW after all so will be a chain rattling oil burning/leaking coolant pissing mess by the time it's 10 years old.

I've just been talking to a friend in the US about a £66k Corvette and I see a review of this gimp mobile for £10k less once you spec it not to have windy windows at a mono AM radio.

It really is depressing what passes as a "performance car" on this side of the Atlantic.

Edited by GeniusOfLove on Monday 11th November 18:32
Gimp mobile? It's just a hot hatch so I don't know why everyone is getting so worked up about it.

AmyRichardson

1,498 posts

49 months

Monday 11th November
quotequote all
Just another family hatchback.

What Car? group test with a Golf, Focus and something Pacific-rim; discuss the shape of the boot, how well the HVAC works, whether the radio is okay- and how many Isofix, obv.

"Meh" out of ten all round.

mooseracer

2,112 posts

177 months

Monday 11th November
quotequote all
GeniusOfLove said:
juice said:


I honestly thought that was a Focus.
Looks more like a not quite as well resolved rip off of the 2012 Volvo V40 to me.
Edited by GeniusOfLove on Monday 11th November 18:32
I'll go with Skoda Scala. But anyway, most cars of each era have always looked similar to each other.

EmailAddress

13,566 posts

225 months

Monday 11th November
quotequote all
It looks like the front half and the back half were designed by two different people.

AlpineA110NL

34 posts

32 months

Monday 11th November
quotequote all
Very ugly and expensive.Pass.

sutts

926 posts

155 months

Monday 11th November
quotequote all
otolith said:
sutts said:
Surprised and irrationally disappointed that one of the few remaining USP’s of the genuine M cars - four exhaust outlets - has now been carried over to the four cylinder junior badge-engineered models.
Meh. It always was cosmetic.
Maybe - my M5 only has two outlets so I have no real skin in the game either way (hence ‘irrational’), however, when you came up behind any M car from the E39 M5 onwards one of the distinguishing features was the four pipes and you knew you were following something a bit special.

This M135 is not special.

Jimjimhim

1,529 posts

7 months

Monday 11th November
quotequote all
sutts said:
otolith said:
sutts said:
Surprised and irrationally disappointed that one of the few remaining USP’s of the genuine M cars - four exhaust outlets - has now been carried over to the four cylinder junior badge-engineered models.
Meh. It always was cosmetic.
Maybe - my M5 only has two outlets so I have no real skin in the game either way (hence ‘irrational’), however, when you came up behind any M car from the E39 M5 onwards one of the distinguishing features was the four pipes and you knew you were following something a bit special.

This M135 is not special.
Not special in the same way that an M5 isn't special, they are just faster than normal family cars.

GeniusOfLove

2,257 posts

19 months

Monday 11th November
quotequote all
sutts said:
otolith said:
sutts said:
Surprised and irrationally disappointed that one of the few remaining USP’s of the genuine M cars - four exhaust outlets - has now been carried over to the four cylinder junior badge-engineered models.
Meh. It always was cosmetic.
Maybe - my M5 only has two outlets so I have no real skin in the game either way (hence ‘irrational’), however, when you came up behind any M car from the E39 M5 onwards one of the distinguishing features was the four pipes and you knew you were following something a bit special.

This M135 is not special.
I wonder what the least impressive car to come from the factor with four exhaust outlets was. I can't think of anything more pathetic than the Alfa Romeo Brera/Spider with a 2.2 litre diesel engine or 1.75 litre petrol engine.

sutts

926 posts

155 months

Monday 11th November
quotequote all
Jimjimhim said:
Not special in the same way that an M5 isn't special, they are just faster than normal family cars.
Well that depends on what M5 you have wink