RE: AC Ace Classic gets electric power for SEMA

RE: AC Ace Classic gets electric power for SEMA

Monday 28th October

AC Ace Classic gets electric power for SEMA

Orders open for 300hp, 1,136kg electrified classic ahead of its Las Vegas debut next week


What a year it’s been for AC Cars. First, the reveal of the 456hp (or 740hp with a supercharger) Cobra GT Coupe, a hard-top version of last year’s carbon-bodied, aluminium-underpinned Roadster revival, while the company’s newly-formed Heritage Division has more recently unveiled the Ace Classic, a continuation of AC’s second most famous car. And it isn’t finished with the big announcements just yet, as an electric version of the Ace Classic has been confirmed for next week's SEMA show.

Unlike the standard AC Classic, which is due to feature a 2.3-litre Ford EcoBoost engine, the EV gets Tremec’s eGT413 electric powertrain, bundling a 300hp motor together with a 72kWh battery that’s said to be good for a range of over 200 miles on a single charge. That means power between the EV and combustion car are identical, so while a 0-62mph time has yet to be revealed, the electric model should outrun the petrol-powered car’s estimated 4.6-second 0-62mph time. Which, in a car with tiny doors and a wafer-thin windscreen, should feel plenty brisk enough.

It’s not like the switch to electric has jacked up the weight, either. AC quotes a ‘sub 1,136kg’ kerbweight for the plug-in version, which is only around 36kg heavier than the combustion car, partly thanks to every body panel being made from carbon fibre. Not that you’d be able to tell, mind, because the EV derivative is a dead ringer for the piston version. AC will offer the same two body styles as it does on the combustion version, inspired by the original 1953-1963 production run, meaning the electric car will be almost indistinguishable its petrol counterpart, bar the absence of gear lever, exhaust and the noise that comes with it.

While SEMA cars rarely make it to production, AC has already opened orders for the Ace electric. It’s only building a ‘limited number’ of them, each carrying a $225,000 (roughly £173,000) price tag before tax. That’d make it a good chunk more than Ford-engined model, which is £175k with tax included, but it’ll no doubt be a fair bit quicker and may prove a little kinder on running costs too. Of course, if the idea of a EV-powered Ace doesn’t float your boat, there’s always this Triumph TR6-engined Hawk replica for a lot, lot less.


Author
Discussion

VladD

Original Poster:

8,011 posts

272 months

Tuesday 29th October
quotequote all
If I was deaf, had lost my left leg and had £200k spare........

Robertb

2,105 posts

245 months

Tuesday 29th October
quotequote all
Actually I'd prefer that to the droning Ford lump they're putting in the ICE one.

mac96

4,436 posts

150 months

Tuesday 29th October
quotequote all
Reading the thread title, I was prepared to be very upset at anyone ruining such a rare classic by trashing the mechanicals and inserting electrics, but if they are building entirely new cars which look like a classic Ace- great, the more the better.

kambites

68,443 posts

228 months

Tuesday 29th October
quotequote all
Ignoring for a moment whether anyone actually wants such a thing (especially at that price!), 72kWh and 1136kg is very impressive!

Wheel Turned Out

1,051 posts

45 months

Tuesday 29th October
quotequote all
"It’s only building a ‘limited number’ of them, each carrying a $225,000 (roughly £173,000) price tag before tax. That’d make it a good chunk more than Ford-engined model, which is £175k with tax included, but it’ll no doubt be a fair bit quicker and may prove a little kinder on running costs too."

Yes I'm sure running costs are a big consideration for the market for these cars.

/s

julian D

14 posts

39 months

Tuesday 29th October
quotequote all
Am EV version of that is about as appealing as alcohol free beer. Not for me thanks and especially at that ridiculous price.

kambites

68,443 posts

228 months

Tuesday 29th October
quotequote all
julian D said:
Am EV version of that is about as appealing as alcohol free beer. Not for me thanks and especially at that ridiculous price.
I'm not sure an inline four ecoboost version for $175k dollars is much more appealing!

ZX10R NIN

28,390 posts

132 months

Tuesday 29th October
quotequote all
kambites said:
julian D said:
Am EV version of that is about as appealing as alcohol free beer. Not for me thanks and especially at that ridiculous price.
I'm not sure an inline four ecoboost version for $175k dollars is much more appealing!
Nope neither are appealing, it has to be a V8 not a big one something like a simple 289.

J4CKO

42,880 posts

207 months

Tuesday 29th October
quotequote all
kambites said:
julian D said:
Am EV version of that is about as appealing as alcohol free beer. Not for me thanks and especially at that ridiculous price.
I'm not sure an inline four ecoboost version for $175k dollars is much more appealing!
Could always have an old Zephyr six engine instead, or some wheezy old four.

don logan

3,571 posts

229 months

Tuesday 29th October
quotequote all
You can’t see it when you are driving it

Why would you care about driving / owning this car?

I’m sure the interaction with the controls (however bad they are) is 50% of the Ace / Cobra experience

Some things are better for being awkward, especially when they are just toys



Edited by don logan on Tuesday 29th October 14:16

LotusOmega375D

8,116 posts

160 months

Tuesday 29th October
quotequote all
They couldn’t resist flaring the wheel arches a bit to make it look more Cobra-esque, could they? Shame.

Olivergt

1,652 posts

88 months

Tuesday 29th October
quotequote all
200 miles from 72kwh?

That doesn't sound like very much?

A Kia EV6 gets well over 300 from 77kwh?

fred bloggs

1,354 posts

207 months

Tuesday 29th October
quotequote all
Olivergt said:
200 miles from 72kwh?

That doesn't sound like very much?

A Kia EV6 gets well over 300 from 77kwh?
What sad times we live in.

don logan

3,571 posts

229 months

Tuesday 29th October
quotequote all
fred bloggs said:
Olivergt said:
200 miles from 72kwh?

That doesn't sound like very much?

A Kia EV6 gets well over 300 from 77kwh?
What sad times we live in.
Incredibly sad

Who asked what the MPG was when they bought an original new or used….. EVER?

They wanted one for all of the things this one doesn’t have



Olivergt

1,652 posts

88 months

Tuesday 29th October
quotequote all
don logan said:
fred bloggs said:
Olivergt said:
200 miles from 72kwh?

That doesn't sound like very much?

A Kia EV6 gets well over 300 from 77kwh?
What sad times we live in.
Incredibly sad

Who asked what the MPG was when they bought an original new or used….. EVER?

They wanted one for all of the things this one doesn’t have
Agree entirely, but the thread is about the EV version and I was just questioning why the range (MPG) is so poor!



Firebobby

691 posts

46 months

Tuesday 29th October
quotequote all
don logan said:
fred bloggs said:
Olivergt said:
200 miles from 72kwh?

That doesn't sound like very much?

A Kia EV6 gets well over 300 from 77kwh?
What sad times we live in.
Incredibly sad

Who asked what the MPG was when they bought an original new or used….. EVER?

They wanted one for all of the things this one doesn’t have
Whoever asked the mpg of any car they bought? After 50 years of motoring and over 45 cars I can't recall ever asking that question!

don logan

3,571 posts

229 months

Tuesday 29th October
quotequote all
Olivergt said:
don logan said:
fred bloggs said:
Olivergt said:
200 miles from 72kwh?

That doesn't sound like very much?

A Kia EV6 gets well over 300 from 77kwh?
What sad times we live in.
Incredibly sad

Who asked what the MPG was when they bought an original new or used….. EVER?

They wanted one for all of the things this one doesn’t have
Agree entirely, but the thread is about the EV version and I was just questioning why the range (MPG) is so poor!
I get it, sorry if you thought I was barking at you personally

LotusOmega375D

8,116 posts

160 months

Tuesday 29th October
quotequote all
Firebobby said:
Whoever asked the mpg of any car they bought? After 50 years of motoring and over 45 cars I can't recall ever asking that question!
Was any of those 45 cars a Jensen Interceptor SP by any chance?

Nobody13

514 posts

209 months

Tuesday 29th October
quotequote all
ZX10R NIN said:
kambites said:
julian D said:
Am EV version of that is about as appealing as alcohol free beer. Not for me thanks and especially at that ridiculous price.
I'm not sure an inline four ecoboost version for $175k dollars is much more appealing!
Nope neither are appealing, it has to be a V8 not a big one something like a simple 289.
^^^ THIS.

Olivergt

1,652 posts

88 months

Tuesday 29th October
quotequote all
Nobody13 said:
ZX10R NIN said:
kambites said:
julian D said:
Am EV version of that is about as appealing as alcohol free beer. Not for me thanks and especially at that ridiculous price.
I'm not sure an inline four ecoboost version for $175k dollars is much more appealing!
Nope neither are appealing, it has to be a V8 not a big one something like a simple 289.
^^^ THIS.
^^^ THIS AGAIN.

Given that this is going to be a 4th,5th or just another car in the collection, with the corresponding usage (i.e. very low mileage) one could even argue from an environmental perspective that the ICE version is cleaner.

The ICE version will certainly be a lot easier to use.

"Quick the suns shining let's take the AC..." With one of the following answers:

"Feck, it's not charged...."
or
"We'll have to stick in a tenner of petrol on the way..."