RE: 2024 Audi RS4 Edition 25 Years | UK Review

RE: 2024 Audi RS4 Edition 25 Years | UK Review

Thursday 24th October

2024 Audi RS4 Edition 25 Years | UK Review

We'll not see an RS4 like the current car again - is the Imola Yellow 25 a fitting farewell?


As the Audi RS4 Avant prepares for life as a plug-in RS5 wagon, so the run-out Edition 25 Years feels increasingly appropriate. The original model swaggered into the 21st century with a twin-turbo V6 of less than 3.0 litres, was offered only as a compact estate, and looked the absolute business in Imola Yellow. With concern brewing over what an electrified future looks like for the Audi Sport icons - see the response and reception to stuff like the C63 and M5 - so there’s something comforting about a familiar shape and familiar spec, and a much-loved colour. Rewriting the rulebook can wait until at least 2025 - it’s time now for a nostalgia trip. 

Any reservations, however legitimate, that linger around this B9 generation of RS4 are pretty easy to dismiss when presented with Imola Yellow, a rude ride height and some snazzy wheels. The opportunity to drive the new model comes with a chance to poke around the car that inspired it as well. While the B9 will never be revered quite like the B5, it’s hard not to look at a pair of small, smart estates that sits perfectly on their wheels, fill out their arches, burp out of chunky exhausts, share a badge and a remit and a colour - and not be impressed. It’s all just very fitting, the great-grandchild finally done good after years of not quite living up to the expectations of a legacy. Yes - Imola Yellow leaves quite an impression.

It’s certainly welcome after the black-is-the-new-black approach for last year’s Competition with which the 25 Years share a lot of vital bits. The carbon backed seats for this model feel really special, too (the Comp featured just RS Sports seats), as does the contrast stitching and the subtle limited edition engraving. White-backed digital dials like it’s an RS2 is a neat touch. You’ll really have to love RS4s (and yellow) for the overhaul to be properly persuasive - although, at this money, it’s really only going to be dyed-in-the-wool enthusiasts that are going to apply. They’ll likely be impressed enough, even if it remains a shame that the additional 25 Years paraphernalia - the Alcantara wheel, driving gloves, the watch - won’t be offered to UK customers. Those paying more than £100k for an RS4 ought to be treated like royalty, so it seems a shame that the full red carpet (or Imola Yellow, perhaps) treatment isn’t being applied. 

While the 25 Years shares some bits with the Competition - the RS sports suspension pro coilovers, the revised sport diff, snappier gearchanges - the two aren’t identical. The yellow car gets another 20hp for starters, meaning 470hp in total, as well as standard ceramic brakes (optional on the Comp), and the intriguing inclusion, exclusive to this model, of an additional two degrees of negative camber on the front axle. Which isn’t nothing. In cahoots with stiffer control arms and a new rear subframe, Audi promises ‘more precise suspension feedback and better overall performance.’

Certainly the 25 Years doesn’t pull any punches at low speed, even a mid-way setting for the suspension is pretty stern in its damping when tasked with manhole covers and the like. But tied-down tautness is preferable to hollow, flimsiness that masquerades as comfy until the first real test. This car, as with the Comp, outlines its intentions from the off in a way that the aloof standard RS4 never did: the growl of the V6, the tension of the ride, and the rasp of the gearshifts all communicate a good deal of intent. Which is welcome.

Sadly there’s not a Competition to compare to the 25 Years, though certainly they both offer up a more engaging drive than the base model. The old black car did without the negative camber; from what can be gleaned, it seems that this one does without the fixed steering ratio of before. That would seem an odd omission, though whatever the case some tweaked hardware (and Pirelli P Zero Corsas) certainly make for a more positive, keener front end here than stock. You know exactly where that custard coloured snout is going as soon as lock is applied, which wasn’t always the case with the RS4. Just don’t expect night and day difference from a Competition. 

Similarly, another 20hp obviously does not elevate the 25 Years onto another plane of performance. It’s probably the nicest installation of this engine yet, however (if that doesn’t sound like faint praise) sounding angry and purposeful through the RS sports exhaust. Truth be told it’s nice to drive a performance car in 2024 not so ludicrously potent that it feels dangerous to accelerate for more than two seconds (this being the first RS4 capable of 300kph, or 186mph, from the factory). The 25 Years growls and barks with the sort of authenticity we always hoped this layout would, with an auto that’s a proper accompaniment now as well. Sort of a shame that this sector does twin turbo sixes and eight speed autos so well, or this might stand out as something more remarkable. 

Ultimately the 25 Years remains as satisfying to drive as the Competition was, with purpose and resolve and a feeling that the driver is being encouraged to have their say on proceedings. The brake feel from the standard ceramics is really good, the willingness of both axles - the front to dive for an apex, the rear to power out - and the steeliness of the damping effort once more makes for an RS4 that will reward driving fast rather than merely tolerate it. An M3 Touring will still deliver a greater thrill, be in no doubt, but the fact that there are folk in Audi Sport who can make an Imola Yellow purse from a sow’s ear (a slight exaggeration; you get the point) does bode well for what’s coming next. 

Indeed, the relative age of the base platform - this RS4 first being introduced at the end of 2017 - already serves up some advantages for the 25. It feels small, even compared to the BMW, perfect for all weathers on any road; a clear set of dials and small screen between them feels nicer than a bamboozling head-up display; the buttons on the wheel make sense; there’s a gearlever, and so on. It isn’t just those elements of the package evoking 2001 that make you yearn for the recent past, basically. Turns out 2017 wasn’t so bad, either. 

However likeable the 25 Years remains, though - and it’s probably the best this generation has been - there really is no escaping the incredible premium being asked. UK buyers are also offered grey or black for less money, although that feels like having a wedding dress that isn’t white to save a few quid. Not the time. But for an Imola Yellow 25 Years Edition, Audi asks £119,180. Where the 60-unit RS6 GT allocation (at much more money) is sold out, around half of our 50 cars remain unspoken for. Because, frankly, it looks a tough sell.

There were just 75 Competitions sold here, remember (and 10 per cent of them are currently on PH), so that’s a very rare and very good RS4 of this generation that can be bought very lightly used for £70k or so. An M3 Touring is less than £90,000, so it must be possible to have that in a BMW Individual Yellow - Neon, Atacama, Dakar, Speed - for a little bit extra. Unlike models including the R8 GT and to a slightly lesser extent the RS6 GT also, the RS4 doesn’t quite do enough to justify either its premium or end-of-an-era billing. But to sit alongside a B5 of an identical colour in the collection, while being better to drive than it probably ever needed to be, the Edition 25 Years will do the job perfectly. 


SPECIFICATION | 2024 AUDI RS4 EDITION 25 YEARS

Engine: 2,894cc, twin-turbo V6
Transmission: 8-speed automatic, four-wheel drive
Power (hp): 470@5,700-6,700rpm
Torque (lb ft): 443@1,900-5,000rpm
0-62mph: 3.7sec
Top speed: 186mph
Weight: 1,790kg (including 75kg driver, standard car)
MPG: 28.8 (standard car)
CO2: 227g/km
Price: £119,180 (Imola Yellow; Nardo Grey £115,880, Mythos Black £116,555)

 

 

 

Author
Discussion

GTEYE

Original Poster:

2,167 posts

217 months

Thursday 24th October
quotequote all
I just don’t know why you’d spend £120k on one, it’s just not special enough to justify that price tag.

An M3 Touring by all accounts is a superior car and substantially cheaper, and you don’t pay anywhere near list for one of those either.

Ray_Aber

562 posts

283 months

Thursday 24th October
quotequote all
Good looking car, apart from the blacked out Audi rings on the grille (which just looks gash). However, as already mentioned (and will be several times), the price is unjustifiable. It's close to Porsche Panamera pricing (see earlier article).

I'd still have this over the BMW M3 Touring, as I cannot abide the looks of that buck toothed prolapsed abomination, but I'd have an Alpina B3 Touring over either.

J4CKO

42,889 posts

207 months

Thursday 24th October
quotequote all
I like the restraint in the styling, RS6 takes things a bit too far.

But, something about the stance doesn’t say lowered so much as am taking a load of paving slabs to the tip.

Twinair

744 posts

149 months

Thursday 24th October
quotequote all
Sucker for a yellow anything me…!

I’ve never had an Audi - 60 cars, no Audi!?

Buying my 1st one next week… it too has a flat bottom steering wheel, (so by this measure - it’s the same!) but it’s district green…!

Love the engine bay on this, sad - I know… :-))

This looks and sounds like it is a worthy RS though?

bigyoungdave

147 posts

34 months

Thursday 24th October
quotequote all
I had positive thoughts until I saw the price, which is ridiculous. Yes the M3 touring is not a looker, but I'd save the money and get that instead

howardhughes

1,113 posts

211 months

Thursday 24th October
quotequote all
GTEYE said:
I just don’t know why you’d spend £120k on one, it’s just not special enough to justify that price tag.

An M3 Touring by all accounts is a superior car and substantially cheaper, and you don’t pay anywhere near list for one of those either.
An M3 touring maybe a superior car, but the styling can only be described as the Elephant Man, as are all new BMW's.

RS4 for me please smile

UK_Scat_Pack

145 posts

163 months

Thursday 24th October
quotequote all
GTEYE said:
An M3 Touring by all accounts is a superior car and substantially cheaper, and you don’t pay anywhere near list for one of those either.
Didn’t know where you’ve read that, as I read the opposite in every review I’ve seen! The RS4 being the benchmark for mid sized estates. In fact I normally see the M3 up against the S4 in group tests. The RS4 is a different level altogether…..

I also think the reason we hardly see any new M3’s/Tourings on the road is that they are ugly as sin!

Still wouldn’t pay £120k for an RS4! That’s ridiculous money and a lot more than the new RS6!


Edited by UK_Scat_Pack on Thursday 24th October 08:02

CKY

1,935 posts

22 months

Thursday 24th October
quotequote all
howardhughes said:
GTEYE said:
I just don’t know why you’d spend £120k on one, it’s just not special enough to justify that price tag.

An M3 Touring by all accounts is a superior car and substantially cheaper, and you don’t pay anywhere near list for one of those either.
An M3 touring maybe a superior car, but the styling can only be described as the Elephant Man, as are all new BMW's.

RS4 for me please smile
I feel similarly to you, especially given my personal preference for yellow. Seems just plain tight of VAG though to shrug off UK-customers and not give them the RS4 Edition trinkets eluded to in the article, especially when charging >£100k for an A4...

Resolutionary

1,313 posts

178 months

Thursday 24th October
quotequote all
This, and a Merlin purple R8 RWS -perfect 2 car garage for moi.

GTEYE

Original Poster:

2,167 posts

217 months

Thursday 24th October
quotequote all
UK_Scat_Pack said:
GTEYE said:
An M3 Touring by all accounts is a superior car and substantially cheaper, and you don’t pay anywhere near list for one of those either.
Didn’t know where you’ve read that, as I read the opposite in every review I’ve seen! The RS4 being the benchmark for mid sized estates. In fact I normally see the M3 up against the S4 in group tests. The RS4 is a different level altogether…..

I also think the reason we hardly see any new M3’s/Tourings on the road is that they are ugly as sin!

Still wouldn’t pay £120k for an RS4! That’s ridiculous money and a lot more than the new RS6!


Edited by UK_Scat_Pack on Thursday 24th October 08:02
I’m not sure where you’re reading your reviews, but EVO, Car and Auto Express all rated the M3 as better.

Doesn’t make the RS4 a bad car but at that price it’s insane!

PaulJC84

978 posts

224 months

Thursday 24th October
quotequote all
Looks very nice in yellow. Always loved the yellow B5 press car too.

Hard to choose one of these over an M3 touring like many have said above.

There was an interesting YouTube video where Steve Sutcliffe lapped the M3 and the RS4 touring. Surprisingly the M3 was not the quicker car at that circuit.

DaveyBoyWonder

2,755 posts

181 months

Thursday 24th October
quotequote all
Ray_Aber said:
I'd still have this over the BMW M3 Touring, as I cannot abide the looks of that buck toothed prolapsed abomination, but I'd have an Alpina B3 Touring over either.
This. And quite a fitting description for the current M3 biggrin

pSyCoSiS

3,736 posts

212 months

Thursday 24th October
quotequote all
Lovely motor, but £120k?! For that outlay, I would much rather buy one each of the nicer examples of the original RS2, the 2001 RS4 and a nice B7 RS4 estate.

Edited by pSyCoSiS on Thursday 24th October 08:44

Dale487

1,413 posts

130 months

Thursday 24th October
quotequote all
Ray_Aber said:
Good looking car, apart from the blacked out Audi rings on the grille (which just looks gash). However, as already mentioned (and will be several times), the price is unjustifiable. It's close to Porsche Panamera pricing (see earlier article).

I'd still have this over the BMW M3 Touring, as I cannot abide the looks of that buck toothed prolapsed abomination, but I'd have an Alpina B3 Touring over either.
Blacked out Audi rings, just make it look like the chrome has fallen off.

Gibbler290

676 posts

102 months

Thursday 24th October
quotequote all
Another run out edition of the RS4? Though there was one a few years ago…

richinlondon

673 posts

129 months

Thursday 24th October
quotequote all
ignoring the price debate it looks lovely except those wheels look perilous on any surface. as roads get worse and worse, Audi tyres get lower and lower profile. We bought a Q5 which has some sidewall and i remember a TFSI 35 A4 on the forecourt with 30 profile tyres - salesman said it was 'his' car and had already blown a tyre on a pot hole...



Edited by richinlondon on Thursday 24th October 08:58

richinlondon

673 posts

129 months

Thursday 24th October
quotequote all
DaveyBoyWonder said:
Ray_Aber said:
I'd still have this over the BMW M3 Touring, as I cannot abide the looks of that buck toothed prolapsed abomination, but I'd have an Alpina B3 Touring over either.
This. And quite a fitting description for the current M3 biggrin
oh we call it the 'angry gopher' in our household now shortened to goph' when we see one.

smilo996

3,065 posts

177 months

Thursday 24th October
quotequote all
The RS4 now looks and is the size of earlier gen RS6's. This one without a stick too.
Had a B5 and loved it but would spend less on a B7 and be much happier. The zenith of RS4's.

37k miles and 40k. Take it to MTM, spend 20k on it and enjoy it for years & half the price. Also yellow, really. Blue is the colour.


Motormouth88

372 posts

67 months

Thursday 24th October
quotequote all
Lovely thing but wild price tag and the rear ride height doesn’t look right to me, looks almost too low

Baldchap

8,385 posts

99 months

Thursday 24th October
quotequote all
The engine is wonderful, really nice to live with. Sadly the suspension undoubtedly isn't, based on the standard car.

But the price is madness.

My well specced 2020 RS4 was £70k. This is £50k more. Adjusted for inflation mine was £86k. Special edition? Round it up to 90 or even 100 if you are feeling brave. £120k for Audi's Nth special edition RS is well into specced B5 money, and a B5 this isn't and never will be.