RE: Audi A8 L W12 | Spotted

RE: Audi A8 L W12 | Spotted

Tuesday 15th October

Audi A8 L W12 | Spotted

Bentley may have been the W12's biggest proponent, but it all started with the A8...


The W engine looks to have well and truly bitten the dust. Bugatti’s Chiron successor, the Tourbillon, has ditched the quad-turbocharged, double-vee format for a (perhaps even loopier) naturally aspirated V16 with a hybrid bolted to it. Meanwhile, Bentley, where the W12 has been a staple of its flagships for over two decades, has now decided that a more conventional twin-turbo V8 hybrid is a suitable substitute (read Nic C’s review of the new Continental GT Speed to see if that’s really the case). Even Volkswagen got in on the W action, with an eight-cylinder Passat and 12-cylinder versions the Phaeton and Touareg.

Now, you don’t need to know the ins and outs of the motor trade to figure out why the W engine’s been shelved. We live in a time where big, thirsty engines make very little sense to a Goliath like the VW Group, especially when serial W12 user Bentley has its long-term sights on a lineup that doesn’t emit any carbon dioxide. Nevertheless, the W engine, especially in 12-cylinder form, will be sorely missed. Few engines could match its versatility, mixing supreme levels of refinement with immense, effortless pace. 

Fortunately, membership to the W12 doesn’t cost a fortune these days. Well, not initially anyway. Early Continental GTs can be had for absolute peanuts, of course, though this Mulliner-spec example for £21,995 looks to be a good place to start, while upping the budget gets you this Continental Super Sport and a nice, round 700hp of grunt at your disposal. A Flying Spur such as this one at £50k brings a bit more practicality, but if you prefer your W12 wrapped in something a little less regal, then you may want to consider the Audi A8 L you see here. 

That’s right, even Audi dabbled with the W engine. In fact, it was the first company under the VW Group umbrella to offer a W12 in a production car, which allowed the flagship D2 A8 to go toe-to-toe with V12 versions of the BMW 7 Series and Mercedes S-Class. The initial version was naturally aspirated, but its turbocharged successors brought considerable hikes in power, torque and waftiness, with the last revision arriving for the 2010 model year. For its final outing, Audi bored the motor out to 6.3-litres, giving chauffeurs 500hp and 461lb-ft of torque to play with on runs to the airport. 

A Swiss watch-like engine paired with the D4 A8’s uber premiumness seemed like a match made in heaven, and reviewers were quick to praise the A8 L's huge pace and cosseting ride quality. But buyers weren’t convinced, with HowManyLeft putting peak registrations at around 42 here in the UK. It didn’t do much better abroad, either, though Audi allegedly claimed at the time that it never expected the W12 A8 to fare well in Europe, instead pinning its hopes on the long-wheelbase hungry markets in Asia. In that regard, it’s a good thing Audi bothered offering it here in the first place, and it’s fair to say they’re a heck of a lot cheaper now than they were a decade ago. 

Which brings us back to the car we have here: a 2013 example with 19,000 miles on the clock, a full Audi main dealer service history and just one previous owner from new. The price being asked is £26,985 - a good £68k cheaper than it would have been ten years ago (and that’s before you take into account the many options that were likely ticked). Alternatively, there’s this D3 with identical miles available at a £10k discount. Yes, early Flying Spurs are cheaper still, but going for the lowest of the low can be a dangerous game to play on any used car, let alone a W12-engined luxury limo. This one ticks the servicing boxes and looks to be in good nick, but it wouldn’t hurt putting a chunk aside for the full £735 VED and some (probably quite substantial) fuel bills.


SPECIFICATION | AUDI A8 L W12 QUATTRO

Engine: 6,299cc W12, twin-turbocharged
Transmission: eight-speed automatic, all-wheel drive
Power (hp): 500@6,200rpm
Torque (lb ft): 461@4,750rpm
MPG: 24
CO2: 277
Year registered: 2013
Recorded mileage: 19,000
Price new: £95,140
Yours for: £26,985

See the original advert here

Author
Discussion

sidesauce

Original Poster:

2,710 posts

225 months

Tuesday 15th October
quotequote all
Rare beast of a car. Interestingly, an even rarer car that used this engine was the VW Touareg, between 2005-2010.

McRors

330 posts

63 months

Tuesday 15th October
quotequote all
I’d love one but simply couldn’t stand the VED rate. Quite why politicians don’t scrap VED and just put a couple of pence on the price of petrol is beyond me. It’d save a fortune in needless bureaucracy and make the owners of inefficient cars pay more. Yet it would also allow normal people to own nice cars if they keep the mileage low.

m62tu

52 posts

46 months

Tuesday 15th October
quotequote all
I always wonder how cars of this caliber (760i, S600 included) escape the production line in bland spec form. The interior should be decadent, two/three tone leather, contrast carpets. No B&O stereo equipped in this trim is a sin.
I assume this is a safer buy than the Passat W8, considering 100k+ Bentleys built and other VAGs with this unit.

stavr0ss

224 posts

135 months

Tuesday 15th October
quotequote all
Audi did one of the best interior options I’ve ever seen on these- light wood strips that looked like scales down yacht decking, would have gone perfectly with that light tan leather.
Nice sleeper but black Audi saloon isn’t my vibe at all, and I genuinely wonder how much different the running costs of a flying spur or conti - especially at £26k, would actually be.

virgilio

431 posts

152 months

Tuesday 15th October
quotequote all
Audi’s w12 were not turbocharged. And much better for that. (only the diesel, which was a v12 not a w12 was turnocharged).

LooneyTunes

7,595 posts

165 months

Tuesday 15th October
quotequote all
sidesauce said:
Rare beast of a car. Interestingly, an even rarer car that used this engine was the VW Touareg, between 2005-2010.
Also the VW Phaeton? Or was that just the big diesel?

mooseracer

2,118 posts

177 months

Tuesday 15th October
quotequote all
McRors said:
I’d love one but simply couldn’t stand the VED rate. Quite why politicians don’t scrap VED and just put a couple of pence on the price of petrol is beyond me. It’d save a fortune in needless bureaucracy and make the owners of inefficient cars pay more. Yet it would also allow normal people to own nice cars if they keep the mileage low.
Because it is (perceived) to be unfair for the large number of people who don't live in cities and so have no choice but to travel larger distances by car as public transport is simply not an option.

Robertb

2,106 posts

245 months

Tuesday 15th October
quotequote all
What is that horrid little screen plonked to the right of the instrument binnacle?

Shame they never made this in SWB (or at least for the uk market) like the D3.

NJJ

463 posts

87 months

Tuesday 15th October
quotequote all
I do find it strange how a lot of journos seem to get all misty eyed over the W12. In its day it was never lauded as a particularly charismatic unit and simply got the job done whilst saving on packaging when compared to a V12. If you really want the turbine smoothness of 12 cylinders, do it properly and get a V12.

cerb4.5lee

33,666 posts

187 months

Tuesday 15th October
quotequote all
McRors said:
I’d love one but simply couldn’t stand the VED rate. Quite why politicians don’t scrap VED and just put a couple of pence on the price of petrol is beyond me. It’d save a fortune in needless bureaucracy and make the owners of inefficient cars pay more. Yet it would also allow normal people to own nice cars if they keep the mileage low.
I have to pay that £735 for only a 3.7 V6 engine in comparison to this. Whereas if I actually owned this I wouldn't feel like I'm having my pants pulled down quite so much I reckon. Like you I wish they would do it a different way, and base it on how many miles you do or something?

Dapster

7,459 posts

187 months

Tuesday 15th October
quotequote all
LooneyTunes said:
sidesauce said:
Rare beast of a car. Interestingly, an even rarer car that used this engine was the VW Touareg, between 2005-2010.
Also the VW Phaeton? Or was that just the big diesel?
You most definitely could (although not sure you could in the UK). The big diesel was the V10 in the Phaeton, you could get the V12 diesel in the Q7


essayer

9,635 posts

201 months

Tuesday 15th October
quotequote all
Robertb said:
What is that horrid little screen plonked to the right of the instrument binnacle?

Shame they never made this in SWB (or at least for the uk market) like the D3.
Is it a Garmin/TomTom satnav? Surely the car has satnav

actual advert link

Edited by essayer on Tuesday 15th October 08:13

soad

33,463 posts

183 months

Tuesday 15th October
quotequote all
m62tu said:
I always wonder how cars of this caliber (760i, S600 included) escape the production line in bland spec form. The interior should be decadent, two/three tone leather, contrast carpets. No B&O stereo equipped in this trim is a sin.
I assume this is a safer buy than the Passat W8, considering 100k+ Bentleys built and other VAGs with this unit.
Far too light for me also, will get muddy/dirty in no time.

ex-devonpaul

1,294 posts

144 months

Tuesday 15th October
quotequote all
Looked at one of these, and the pheaton equivalent, a few years ago, but decided the running costs could be ruinous.

In the end I wasn't brave enough, so bought a Maserati instead.
rolleyes

[edit] they were nearer £10k at the time]

BIRMA

3,863 posts

201 months

Tuesday 15th October
quotequote all
Was just about to buy this highly specced W12 a few years ago to replace my Phaeton V10 TT Diesel, unfortunately my Phaeton met an untimely major problem the day before the PX was about to take place so the deal didn't go through.
Fantastic car to waft up to Scotland where I had a job running but I felt if they had put twin turbos in like the Bentley it would have widened it's appeal.
Very much a case of 'cheap' to buy but the bork factor could make a grown man cry

J4CKO

42,880 posts

207 months

Tuesday 15th October
quotequote all
McRors said:
I’d love one but simply couldn’t stand the VED rate. Quite why politicians don’t scrap VED and just put a couple of pence on the price of petrol is beyond me. It’d save a fortune in needless bureaucracy and make the owners of inefficient cars pay more. Yet it would also allow normal people to own nice cars if they keep the mileage low.
If £735 bothers you, I wouldn't be looking at 11 year old Audi barges with W12 engines for it has the capacity to render that £735 as a single line item on a very long invoice and it will chew through fuel at a fairly alarming rate.

I can sort of see the point but they arent going remove VED by putting a couple of pence on Fuel, they already have two forms of tax on that, they will put those up by a couple of pence (or more) as well and put VED up. And fuel will become electricity over time so its a losing battle anyway.

I think that cars like this would simply be more expensive if there wasnt quite such a penalty for having them around on the off chance you fancy a bit of luxury, does seem unfair, only option is to SORN them for a while but then that negates the point of having it.

To be honest, may as well just pay a bit less and have the full experience and get a Bentley Continental Flying Spur (for less money) which has the same drivetrain but comes with some extra grunt, though I quite like the low key nature of the Audi.

But, putting 27 grand into an 11 year old big Audi that nobody really wants is a folly, if you plan to keep it and not worry about the money then thats fine but dont think you can run it for a couple of years and then move it on as you struggle to get rid for half that, or less. Other 2011 A8's tend to be in the 5 to 7 grand space, and not sure what they are like to move on, judging by the price history on AT, not easy !

Dapster

7,459 posts

187 months

Tuesday 15th October
quotequote all
J4CKO said:
If £735 bothers you, I wouldn't be looking at 11 year old Audi barges with W12 engines for it has the capacity to render that £735 as a single line item on a very long invoice and it will chew through fuel at a fairly alarming rate.
There was a thread a couple of years ago of a Continental GT advertised in the classifieds with the owner evidencing its solid maintenance record by including an image of a £17,000 main dealer service invoice. Ever for someone with brand new Conti GT money to spend on a car, that would sting.

I'd love a go in a W12 Audi and I could easily see one fitting into our family life but the thought of a bill even a fraction of that value would torpedo the whole plan


As an aside, I saw this on Mobile.de. Can this be correct? 20 year old W12 Touregs going for €50 grand?

https://suchen.mobile.de/fahrzeuge/search.html?cn=...






Edited by Dapster on Tuesday 15th October 08:57

LotusOmega375D

8,117 posts

160 months

Tuesday 15th October
quotequote all
Driver’s seat looks very worn compared to all of the other seats which look like new.



I guess the “Please refuel” light comes on the moment you leave the filling station forecourt!


Matt_T

522 posts

81 months

Tuesday 15th October
quotequote all
How do the fuel and temperature guages work? I can't see a needle or light...

Matt_T

522 posts

81 months

Tuesday 15th October
quotequote all
Can't help feeling one of these would give me far fewer headaches...
https://www.pistonheads.com/buy/listing/17224377