RE: Stand well back: the 900hp Manhart MHXM is here

RE: Stand well back: the 900hp Manhart MHXM is here

Thursday 3rd October

Stand well back: the 900hp Manhart MHXM is here

The most controversial M car ever gets more so, thanks to a matt grey wrap, 24-inch wheels - and 885lb ft


It’s been a while since the BMW XM has hogged the headlines, so time to thrust it back into the spotlight: this is the MHXM, a car described by tuner Manhart as nothing less than a ‘colossus’. Which is probably accurate, at least. It adds more than 150hp and almost another 150lb ft to the Label Red flagship, itself already the most powerful M car in history. Where does it end?

From 748hp and 738lb ft in a standard model (thanks to the combination of 4.4-litre twin-turbo V8 and 197hp electric motor), the MHXM now produces 900hp and 885lb ft. Which are ludicrous numbers, even in the days of mega EVs. It’s achieved without any internal changes to the S68 engine, the upgrade instead relying on Manhart’s own MHtronik powerbox, race downpipes, high-flow cats and stainless steel exhaust. An Akrapovic system is also available. Given the XM Label Red won’t be everyone’s cup of tea, it’s probably worth remembering how much is shared with the new M5 - what a monster that could be with this tune. 

For those who find the saloon and wagon too timid, Manhart’s cosmetic overhaul for the MHXM 900 ought to hit the spot. There are Manhart by H&R lowering springs, slamming the big BMW down onto its new 24-inch wheels, the rears shod in ridiculous 355/25 R24 tyres. Manhart reckons the ‘extravagant, extroverted look’ of the XM Label Red (you can say that again) is ‘significantly sharpened’ by its carbon bodykit, which adds two rear spoilers (of course), a diffuser, sill extensions, a new bonnet, even angrier grille and so on. It’s as subtle as a roundhouse kick, and so it might be argued the perfect XM upgrade. The matt grey wrap is also a Manhart feature. 

Unsurprisingly given the amount of carbon real estate seen here, the entire MHXM package isn’t cheap. Those that want everything, from springs to side skirts and wheels to mirror carps, will be asked for €46,275 (or just over £38,500) in return. And that’s without an Akrapovic or a wrap. Those interested in just the power will be asked for €4,760 (basically £4k) in exchange for Manhart’s skills in that department. The XM’s fairly steep initial depreciation might at least help with those who do wish to modify - this standard model (so with the V8, but not to Red spec) has £30k off new after 1,000 miles. And that buys a lot of carbon…


 

Author
Discussion

petrolhead888

Original Poster:

263 posts

214 months

Thursday 3rd October
quotequote all
That has to be, in all my years of following cars, the most distasteful thing I have ever had the misfortune to clap eyes on.

I thought the Ssanyong Rodius was the worst thing, until seeing this monstrosity.

I am not saying this for effect, I am saying it because I am shocked that a BMW can look so bad!

I drive a 2015 BMW 640D M-Sport Coupe as my daily and to me is one of the best looking things to come out of BMW, this is just well ahem....

OFFENSIVE!

Then there a people out there who stop and think,,,,,Hmm lets make it look worse!

How is it possible?

Well thumbs up guys you have achieved the impossible!

But you have got me and probably lots of other people to comment so you have gained fame!

Not for the right reasons in my sore eyes!




petrolhead888

Original Poster:

263 posts

214 months

Thursday 3rd October
quotequote all


Did the guy who thought this looks good, get a job at BMW or something?

What on earth do people think when they design this sort of tat! Do they really stand back and go "mmmm, looks just how I wanted it" or do they go " mmmm......I've cocked that one right up, but I`m in too deep now!"

unsprung

5,818 posts

131 months

Thursday 3rd October
quotequote all


Perched, as we are, along the autumn of the internal combustion engine, and nigh on peak oligarch, there is now a steady flow of press releases: limited-edition this, manufactured-scarcity that.

Nowadays big power is relatively easy to whip up.

But is there design?

It's interesting that so many of these celebrate brutalism over beauty.



Terminator X

16,360 posts

211 months

Thursday 3rd October
quotequote all
If I see one on the road I promise to set fire to it flames

TX.

Ashok

608 posts

266 months

Thursday 3rd October
quotequote all
A new low for BMW. Truly vile. There should be a zero stars voting option for vehicles like this - and the price feels like some kind of sick joke.

Mercutio

242 posts

169 months

Thursday 3rd October
quotequote all
Thing is, all the people deriding this styling, are also in the same forum where lots of folk say “I love how aggressive the styling is” or “privacy glass makes a car look modern” etc.

The existence of the super SUV segment, which is slightly bizarre in itself, has never really been about stealth or elegance.

It’s about aggression and visual cock-waving. Plenty of powerfully built director types love this segment and actively WANT it to look like the automotive equivalent of an XL bully.

I’m not defending a car design which I would happily pay someone not to own, so far is it from my taste.

I’m just also stating that we got here through a series of incremental choices that meant the car at the top of the pack in certain people’s minds is no longer getting a beautiful fast coupe, but an aggressive looking, wide, overstayed and spoiler-sporting SUV.

Benzinaio

171 posts

9 months

Thursday 3rd October
quotequote all
Well sick bruv.

Innit.


wistec1

451 posts

48 months

Thursday 3rd October
quotequote all
Lipstick on a pig is what this looks like and take it all away and your still left looking at the hairy anus of BMW which has got piles.

Bill

54,288 posts

262 months

Thursday 3rd October
quotequote all
Who the suffering fk thought illuminating the nostrils was a good look??

v8notbrave

45 posts

20 months

Thursday 3rd October
quotequote all
This gave me a right chuckle in the morning, thank you! Only to be driven by total bell3nds!

CountyAFC

1,646 posts

10 months

Thursday 3rd October
quotequote all
In this sector of super SUV's, tame doesn't sell, so you might as well go big or go home.

In that respect, they've nailed it.

It's no more offensive to me than a Brabus G-Wagen.


Robigus

59 posts

239 months

Thursday 3rd October
quotequote all
Automotive goatse.

KingGary

769 posts

7 months

Thursday 3rd October
quotequote all
Looks like it’s sneezing.

Mabbs9

1,266 posts

225 months

Thursday 3rd October
quotequote all
I can't say that works for me.

julian D

14 posts

39 months

Thursday 3rd October
quotequote all
That is one ugly thing

fantheman80

1,653 posts

56 months

Thursday 3rd October
quotequote all
The now sacked BMW design team may just look back at this 'interpretation' and finally say "my god, what have we created"

Kipsrs

512 posts

56 months

Thursday 3rd October
quotequote all
Mercutio made mention of: “Cock-wavinng, powerfully built director types, XL bully” - however, forgot beard, tattoos and bad attitude.
Other than adding that, I’m truly lost for words . . . vomit

Gary29

4,323 posts

106 months

Thursday 3rd October
quotequote all
Yep, at least if you see one on the road, you know to give it a wide berth as only a street pharmacist type would ever choose to own such a thing.

richinlondon

673 posts

129 months

Thursday 3rd October
quotequote all
normally with any car there is even a tiny bit of styling somewhere that is okay, this however - every inch is absolutely dreadful. There's a sense of optimism from BMWs new concept-stage designs however that after a few short years they're moving away from this hideousness.

Robertb

2,106 posts

245 months

Thursday 3rd October
quotequote all
A turd rolled in turd