RE: HWA Evo: 'Please don't call it a restomod'

RE: HWA Evo: 'Please don't call it a restomod'

Author
Discussion

richinlondon

612 posts

125 months

Thursday 20th June
quotequote all
taste and lots of money are often uneasy bedfellows...

DonkeyApple

56,525 posts

172 months

Thursday 20th June
quotequote all
je777 said:
Also, is there a technical reason why some people nowadays use mainbeam on dual carriageways?
Yes. They're thick as mince and self centred, like the potatoes who go onto main beam before they've passed you. biggrin. Actually, the latter scenario has become so prevalent that I suspect it's not just spuds doing it manually but the cars are picking up that the beam from your lights have gone beyond the sensors so they slam back onto mainbeam before they've actually passed you the driver maybe?

LotusOmega375D

7,802 posts

156 months

Thursday 20th June
quotequote all
When they finally decide what to do with the interior I hope they use the original Stuttgart taxi steering wheel.

Jon_S_Rally

3,471 posts

91 months

Thursday 20th June
quotequote all
I'm not sure. I like it, but I think it would look better with the same size wheels front and rear. The dark lights don't do much for me either. Still, as a piece of engineering, it sounds really interesting, so will be fascinating to see how it performs (if any journos are allowed to drive one anyway).

Great to see projects like this either way. The mainstream car market is getting increasingly dull, so stuff like this is a breath of fresh air.

richinlondon said:
taste and lots of money are often uneasy bedfellows...
Unlike a lack of money and bitterness towards those who have it laugh

NGK210

3,094 posts

148 months

Thursday 20th June
quotequote all
LotusOmega375D said:
When they finally decide what to do with the interior I hope they use the original Stuttgart taxi steering wheel.
And keep the Merc 80s-era ‘wood’ trim. Plus the option of a beaded seat cover - in carbonfibre, natch.

je777

350 posts

107 months

Thursday 20th June
quotequote all
Sandpit Steve said:
Loving all these restomods.

Yes they’re all madly expensive, with thousands of hours of labour going into each one, and thousands more going into design and tooling - but the new supercar market is now filled with big things that all look the same, with automatic gearboxes, hybrid systems, loads of electronics, all coming in several hundred kg overweight.

I’d probably still go for the Singer 911 though, when those lucky numbers come in.
Exactly. People go on about how expensive they are, but for those who buy them it's just an arbitrary number. And why not have a car with some individuality, etc.

Other than the GMA T50, I can't remember the last supercar that interested me. Oh look, power I can't use, click to change gear, only the electronics keeping it on the road... and then you add in the even faster ones that emit nothing but an awful whining noise.

je777

350 posts

107 months

Thursday 20th June
quotequote all
DonkeyApple said:
je777 said:
Also, is there a technical reason why some people nowadays use mainbeam on dual carriageways?
Yes. They're thick as mince and self centred, like the potatoes who go onto main beam before they've passed you. biggrin. Actually, the latter scenario has become so prevalent that I suspect it's not just spuds doing it manually but the cars are picking up that the beam from your lights have gone beyond the sensors so they slam back onto mainbeam before they've actually passed you the driver maybe?
I suspected as much.

We need laws that prevent people from blinding others: it's a nightmare driving at night with the brightness of modern car lights. And why are lorries allowed to have those roof lights taken off the Glastonbury main stage so that when they flash each other even going in the opposite direction on a motorway it's distracting/blinding?

If you let people do what they want, they behave like pillocks.

GTRene

17,024 posts

227 months

Thursday 20th June
quotequote all
Maccmike8 said:
100% a restomod. Embrace it.
maybe a better fitting word for such Evo beauty = Evocation

so its a Evocation.

or Homage.

or Tribute.

ChawenHalo

70 posts

132 months

Thursday 20th June
quotequote all
Surprised they didn't take the opportunity to make a 3 door, but most of all why they pussied out of N/A engine. Guess that to sell a restomod for close to a mill it had to do big numbers...meh.

DonkeyApple

56,525 posts

172 months

Thursday 20th June
quotequote all
GTRene said:
Maccmike8 said:
100% a restomod. Embrace it.
maybe a better fitting word for such Evo beauty = Evocation

so its a Evocation.

or Homage.

or Tribute.
Why not 'Shooting Brake'? Although Merc have already used that to try and claim an estate car isn't an estate car. How about 'Banana' or 'chair'? biggrin


If it looks like a duck, swims like a duck, and quacks like a duck, then it probably is a duck kartoffelsalat.

CLK-GTR

907 posts

248 months

Thursday 20th June
quotequote all
Snubs said:
Meant as a joke I'm sure but I'd still be intrigued to see that in as much as where would you they go with it? The looks and size were already pretty extreme, the engineering was pretty much all racecar. If anything i could see HWA toning the CLK GTR back down with a more regular gearbox or something that that...
Imagine one of these stupid modern track day specials but looks like the 90s racer. As wild as the original but doesn't need Bernd Schneider to control it. That would have my lottery win money any day.

mwstewart

7,757 posts

191 months

Thursday 20th June
quotequote all
Very nice restomod. Nothing wring with the term.

howardhughes

1,041 posts

207 months

Thursday 20th June
quotequote all
Im a big 190E 2.3 / 2.5 fan. Gorgeous cars, but this does absolutely nothing for me. As does the Restomod Lancia 037

There is absolutely no need to fk about with an original masterpiece of engineering.

Wheel Turned Out

667 posts

41 months

Thursday 20th June
quotequote all
Doesn't seem like they're planning on putting a great deal of effort into the interior, which is a bit disappointing at this price point.

Capitan Obvio

17,814 posts

203 months

Thursday 20th June
quotequote all
I’ll just take a standard 190 E 2.5-16 Evolution II thanks and keep the £600k change.

This one would do
https://rmsothebys.com/auctions/lf18/lots/r0073-19...

Sandpit Steve

10,696 posts

77 months

Thursday 20th June
quotequote all
je777 said:
Sandpit Steve said:
Loving all these restomods.

Yes they’re all madly expensive, with thousands of hours of labour going into each one, and thousands more going into design and tooling - but the new supercar market is now filled with big things that all look the same, with automatic gearboxes, hybrid systems, loads of electronics, all coming in several hundred kg overweight.

I’d probably still go for the Singer 911 though, when those lucky numbers come in.
Exactly. People go on about how expensive they are, but for those who buy them it's just an arbitrary number. And why not have a car with some individuality, etc.

Other than the GMA T50, I can't remember the last supercar that interested me. Oh look, power I can't use, click to change gear, only the electronics keeping it on the road... and then you add in the even faster ones that emit nothing but an awful whining noise.
A big Hell Yeah on the Gordon Murray cars, but good luck getting close to one. He’s been really careful about who he’s selling them to, and few are expecting to see many on the resale market any time soon. T-50 is going to be a £10m car in ten years’ time.

mersontheperson

710 posts

168 months

Thursday 20th June
quotequote all
I have seen a few of these in Albania

oedipus

397 posts

69 months

Friday 21st June
quotequote all
Peak restomod

WPA

9,193 posts

117 months

Friday 21st June
quotequote all
Capitan Obvio said:
I’ll just take a standard 190 E 2.5-16 Evolution II thanks and keep the £600k change.

This one would do
https://rmsothebys.com/auctions/lf18/lots/r0073-19...
Yep, cloud9

big_rob_sydney

3,438 posts

197 months

Friday 21st June
quotequote all
I wonder if it's just me, but I dont see the value in this restomod version of the original car. With the Prodrive p25, you can buy the original car for a fraction of the price; is the same true here?

Why on earth would you buy a compromised frankenstein version of a car at huge expense, when you can get the original, PLUS things like purpose built race cars, bikes, planes, helicopters, and art, all for less than the price of one of these, AND still have enough money left over for hookers and blow?