RE: 2024 Polestar 4 | PH Review

RE: 2024 Polestar 4 | PH Review

Author
Discussion

Kawasicki

13,162 posts

238 months

SDK said:
bigyoungdave said:
Not all dynamic issues can be solved by software updates, particularly when it comes to ride and handling
The dampers are electronically adjustable and have continuously controlled active ride control. So these will be adjustable via software.
The option Performance Pack add's 'Performance tuned chassis tweaks', so likely this will add further improvements
The ride issues have very possibly nothing to do with the software tunable parameters of the adaptive damping. If they were they would have already been fixed.

Quickmoose

4,577 posts

126 months

I liked it when Polestar had a clear image/aesthetic - like their sister badge Volvo.
Now they're messing with it. Leaning more into what everyone else is doing. Where nearly all other brands homogenise and Volvo stood apart... they're joining the lazy party...
Still some very unique USP bits here and there, but overall, they've slipped back a step for me.

Doshy

829 posts

220 months

Dreadful giant ipad interior.

Possum19

32 posts

24 months

What's the cost of a replacemnet windscreen for cars like this, the Tesla Model X or even for something like the Citroen C4 picasso? Will insurance even cover it through Autoglass like more normally screened cars?

I'd be terrified of windscreen chips or worse cracks...

Chris-c1qtx

6 posts

92 months

Considering one of these to replace my tesla y (can't get the new one due to indicator-gate)

Sounds like I'd best wait to see if they manage to make it drive properly though judging from this review. The ride in the coil sprung tesla is hard and crashy around town, but ok at speed. I was hoping the air sprung polestar would be an improvement.

Rich Boy Spanner

1,396 posts

133 months

That's one of the most damning reviews I've read in a long time. The rear window loss is silly to me. I look out of the rear window when I am parked and the kids too generally. I already have a car with a rear camera feeding the rear view 'mirror' screen (on a Leaf) and it gets dirty quite quickly in bad weather. Fortunately it sits behind the rear window and gets cleaned with the rear wiper.

AndrewNR

278 posts

125 months

Looks like a bad Tesla 3

Frankychops

662 posts

12 months

its hard to tell, can you put dogs in the boot? Live ones ideally.

Nik Gnashers

792 posts

159 months

Not sure I really 'get' what this (and dozens of other) massive, heavy, EV, performance SUV's are about.
When somebody criticises the handling, the EV lovers respond with comments like 'well it's not designed to be an elise, it's a family car' (or something similar).
Well if that is the case, why does it need 544bhp ?
A family car should be designed to be efficient, and surely a lower power output but a lot more range would be better for a family car ?

If traffic light racing is all PH cares about nowadays, or at least the people who frequent it's forums and defend these types of vehicle, then it's a bit sad.

I make no secret I don't like large SUV's, and when it comes to EV's I like them even less, but if I am going to be forced into one at some stage, then I will need to find something that fits my personal preferences, and so far nothing on sale does that.
Even the smaller hot EV's look absolutely ghastly to my eyes.

I think the issue is, they all look similar, and if you don't like one then you are not going to like any.

Where are the EV's without a huge ipad stuck to the dash, and styled to appeal to people like me who don't want a fridge on wheels with a load of fake tat stuck to it ?

GT9

7,111 posts

175 months

The quoted 'MPG' numbers for miles/kWh look a bit off.
The respective range values look about right for comparing single/dual motor versions, i.e. 5% difference, but not the miles/kWh.

GT9

7,111 posts

175 months

Nik Gnashers said:
Well if that is the case, why does it need 544bhp ?
A family car should be designed to be efficient, and surely a lower power output but a lot more range would be better for a family car ?
As per my previous post, the dual motor version suffers a 5% drop in range for the same battery capacity.
Power drops from 544 bhp to 272 bhp for the single motor spec.
Are you sure you are not making a fuss over nothing?

Muddle238

3,954 posts

116 months

Lots of talk regarding the lack of rear window, but for me the smaller detail that's equally as gash are the stickers behind the front wheel arches telling you what it is.

Saw one on a Polestar 2 and thought it had been left on by the factory in error, until I discovered they all have them. Looks utterly crap. If I had a Polestar, that sticker would duly be peeled off and aimed at the nearest wheelie bin.

Look forward to seeing these (and the Polestar 3) in the flesh, although I must admit to finding the Polestar 2 a bit bland nowadays.

SDK

Original Poster:

986 posts

256 months

Nik Gnashers said:
Where are the EV's without a huge ipad stuck to the dash, and styled to appeal to people like me who don't want a fridge on wheels with a load of fake tat stuck to it ?
Welcome to 2024 - all new cars have ‘iPads stuck to the dash’, regardless of the power source.

As for your other point:
Cars with big power and weight have existed for decades - most people with a German Super Saloon are not tracking those either.
The advantage of an EV is that it can have big power, without much impact on overall range, if you’re not pushing on.

Honeywell

1,389 posts

101 months

smilo996 said:
Every Polestar makes Tesla look like their cars were designed by Fisher Price. The rear no screen might be a step too far for some but another solid performance from them.
But the Tesla rivals are much lighter and much more efficient. Plus whilst a Polestar driver is heabutting an Ionity charger trying to get it to work with his App the Tesla driver is plugged into a Supercharger.

Style over substance?

Nik Gnashers

792 posts

159 months

SDK said:
Nik Gnashers said:
Where are the EV's without a huge ipad stuck to the dash, and styled to appeal to people like me who don't want a fridge on wheels with a load of fake tat stuck to it ?
Welcome to 2024 - all new cars have ‘iPads stuck to the dash’, regardless of the power source.

As for your other point:
Cars with big power and weight have existed for decades - most people with a German Super Saloon are not tracking those either.
The advantage of an EV is that it can have big power, without much impact on overall range, if you’re not pushing on.
German super saloons are not your average family car though.

My point is very relevant, where are new cars for people like me (and my opinion is shared by a massive percentage of car buyers) ?
I don't want a huge ipad stuck to the dash thanks, I like clear, simple, dials.
I also don't want 500+ bhp in an average family car.
I'd happily trade lower power with a greater range, in a family car, and would appreciate better handling with less weight, over ultimate straight line performance and 500+ bhp in an average family car.

If I am being forced into an EV, and I don't want a 120 mile range EV 2 seater sports car, or a 2.5 tonne mahoosive SUV with 500+ bhp, what can I buy that doesn't look gash, and doesn't have an ipad stuck to the dash ?

Nomme de Plum

4,865 posts

19 months

Nik Gnashers said:
German super saloons are not your average family car though.

My point is very relevant, where are new cars for people like me (and my opinion is shared by a massive percentage of car buyers) ?
I don't want a huge ipad stuck to the dash thanks, I like clear, simple, dials.
I also don't want 500+ bhp in an average family car.
I'd happily trade lower power with a greater range, in a family car, and would appreciate better handling with less weight, over ultimate straight line performance and 500+ bhp in an average family car.

If I am being forced into an EV, and I don't want a 120 mile range EV 2 seater sports car, or a 2.5 tonne mahoosive SUV with 500+ bhp, what can I buy that doesn't look gash, and doesn't have an ipad stuck to the dash ?
You are not being forced into anything. You can buy a shiny new ICE right up until 2035 by and carryon running it for as long as you wish after. By that time there will be a plethora of lower powered cars for you to drive. My EV has 184bhp and 150 mile range and weighs 1350kg. I have no doubt when I replace it will be an EV with similar power and weight but greater range although a BMW 4 series ICE goes from about 1700kg -1900kg so Family cars are no longer light.

Why are you so obsessed about weight?

Terminator X

15,375 posts

207 months

Nomme de Plum said:
You are not being forced into anything. You can buy a shiny new ICE right up until 2035 by and carryon running it for as long as you wish after. By that time there will be a plethora of lower powered cars for you to drive. My EV has 184bhp and 150 mile range and weighs 1350kg. I have no doubt when I replace it will be an EV with similar power and weight but greater range although a BMW 4 series ICE goes from about 1700kg -1900kg so Family cars are no longer light.

Why are you so obsessed about weight?
Your EV is not new though? Don't make em light like that any more.

A lot of posters seem to be "obsessed" by weight, have you noticed ...

TX.

GT9

7,111 posts

175 months

Terminator X said:
A lot of posters seem to be "obsessed" by weight, have you noticed ...

TX.
But not the tens of tons of diesel saved, no never that, god forbid.

Nomme de Plum

4,865 posts

19 months

Terminator X said:
Nomme de Plum said:
You are not being forced into anything. You can buy a shiny new ICE right up until 2035 by and carryon running it for as long as you wish after. By that time there will be a plethora of lower powered cars for you to drive. My EV has 184bhp and 150 mile range and weighs 1350kg. I have no doubt when I replace it will be an EV with similar power and weight but greater range although a BMW 4 series ICE goes from about 1700kg -1900kg so Family cars are no longer light.

Why are you so obsessed about weight?
Your EV is not new though? Don't make em light like that any more.

A lot of posters seem to be "obsessed" by weight, have you noticed ...

TX.
You are correct or is not new in fact it is now 4 years old. I have no intention of parting with it as it fulfills its purpose.

GT9

7,111 posts

175 months

Nik Gnashers said:
I'd happily trade lower power with a greater range, in a family car, and would appreciate better handling with less weight, over ultimate straight line performance and 500+ bhp in an average family car.
Why are you ignoring the fact that the single motor version only has only 5% more range than the dual motor version?
It's been pointed out multiple times on this thread, and I'm pretty sure I've described it to you previously.
You cannot, carte blanche, use ICE design rules to judge electric powertrains.
A 600 bhp ICE has a much higher fuel consumption under normal driving conditions than the same car with 300 bhp.
A 600 bhp EV has a very similar energy consumption to a 300 bhp EV under normal driving conditions.
Different powertrains, different rules.
Extra power in an EV doesn't harm the range permanently, only if you absolutely thrash it everywhere.
Where's the downside?