RE: 2025 BMW M5 prototype (G90) | PH Review

RE: 2025 BMW M5 prototype (G90) | PH Review

Author
Discussion

redroadster

1,785 posts

234 months

Wednesday
quotequote all
Cars are competing in fastest and heaviest competition who will be crowned champion ? .

Exasperated

104 posts

13 months

Wednesday
quotequote all
redroadster said:
Cars are competing in fastest and heaviest competition who will be crowned champion ? .
This all ends with BMW fitting a JATO pack to a 2m³ tungsten cube wrapped in nappa leather.

DrEMa

747 posts

94 months

Wednesday
quotequote all
Nimerino said:
£110 000+ and 2.5 tonnes, yet they still refuse to press new rear doors so the wheel arch doesn’t abruptly cut off at the front like on a £110 Halfords special. Looked stupid on the M3, looks equally stupid here.
hadn't noticed until you pointed it out, now I can't unsee it. Really doesn't look right at all.

Harry_523

391 posts

101 months

Wednesday
quotequote all
Im suddenly a lot less excited for the M5 Touring.

Off we go to look at Alpina B5s again.....

theicemario

705 posts

77 months

Wednesday
quotequote all
Behold, the 2.5 tonne M5! Well, at least the colour is nice.

cerb4.5lee

31,344 posts

182 months

Wednesday
quotequote all
I used to moan(almost every day) about the weight of my old E92 M3 at 1650kg, but that thing is a slim Jim now in comparison to modern cars for sure. The E39 M5 was "only" around 1800kg IIRC too.

At least these modern hybrid or fully electric cars give me something to grumble about though, and I love to grumble to be fair.

Arsecati

2,377 posts

119 months

Wednesday
quotequote all
Wonderman said:
...and no doubt the Transit will be faster wink
And with more space for dogs and children, while possessing the elevated driving position beloved of SUV drivers everywhere.... how could you go wrong?? biglaughbiglaughbiglaugh

Iamnotkloot

1,462 posts

149 months

Wednesday
quotequote all
What a fat bd!

CKY

1,544 posts

17 months

Wednesday
quotequote all
cerb4.5lee said:
I used to moan(almost every day) about the weight of my old E92 M3 at 1650kg, but that thing is a slim Jim now in comparison to modern cars for sure. The E39 M5 was "only" around 1800kg IIRC too.

At least these modern hybrid or fully electric cars give me something to grumble about though, and I love to grumble to be fair.
You and me both - I remember mentioning the E92 M3 wasn't far off the weight of my old E34 M5 at the time it was released, positively Anorexic compared to this M5. 285 front tyres to try and combat the sheer girth of the thing, not going to offer a massive amount in terms of feel or 'communication' through the steering wheel then - huge outright grip and then just understeer. Also laughable that it's actually slower than the outgoing M5 until speeds become illegal (on UK roads), goes to show even the geniuses at BMW M can't fight the laws of physics. Wasn't 2.5 tonnes about what the original Audi Q7 weighed?!

GreatScott2016

1,270 posts

90 months

Wednesday
quotequote all
Iamnotkloot said:
What a fat bd!
biglaugh

Quickmoose

4,564 posts

125 months

Wednesday
quotequote all
vincenz said:
Clivey said:
Have you read the article?
I have dude, it’s progress, whether we like it or not ??
'progress' is ideally when things get better.
When more resources are required for a thing that once needed less, and when that thing being a car struggles to overcome physics in the way it once did (and then subjectively also does that whilst moving the aesthetic game backwards), that ain't progress.

Legislation and the green agenda have pushed hard to rid us of fossil fuel public transport and replace with electricity. With that has come, stupendous stats, amazing in absolute straight line, chronic when weight is considered. Accepting emissions have to be gotten rid of, when millions of 3 tonne passenger cars are darting to 30mph in 1.3 seconds, I really don't see that as progress in any way at all. that's THREE tonnes of resource/material.

Anyway, BMW's design language continues to disappoint... a smidge better but it's not classy is it, like the brand once was....not progress.

Times change, it's allowed to not like aspects of whats put in front of us and marketed as the better thing than what went before.... you don't have to "get with it"

Birky_41

4,341 posts

186 months

Wednesday
quotequote all
The era of super saloon 2.5t cars being superbike motorcycle quick is here

Those stats for an unmapped car is incredible. Commute to work on electric and have supercar performance on the weekend

My own 1000+ cc super naked motorbike would only just edge that off the mark and would lose out on near 20mph top speed

stuckmojo

3,037 posts

190 months

Wednesday
quotequote all
My neighbour has a new 5 series in EV form. Once you are close by, it feels very tall, and enormous. Almost like a 3 volume SUV with a boot designed to fool you. Also, the design language gives the impression that it's made of Chinesium, or the sort-of plastic used for the cheapest appliances.

Some here will say that BMW numbers speak for their success. Fair enough.

As a serial BMW buyer, the last 5 years have been quite disappointing. They don't sell a single car I like.

Wills2

23,404 posts

177 months

Wednesday
quotequote all

It's not a good looking car to these eyes, it weighs 2.5 tonnes to EU, the power to weight is the same as my old F10 M5 which was launched 13 years ago I'm just not seeing any progress.




Mike1990

986 posts

133 months

Wednesday
quotequote all
Looks alright if I'm honest.

The weight issue though! its heavy thing.

sidewinder500

1,213 posts

96 months

Wednesday
quotequote all
oldaudi said:
https://youtu.be/LioNP7EQB0g?si=DIpILs3nckRAp39M

BMW M you tube channel released this last night. No idea why an old bloke is taking selfies sat in the car.
Seems to be the target group...

How times have changed

RSbandit

2,644 posts

134 months

Wednesday
quotequote all
This is in the seriously undesirable category for me …challenging looks , slower than the old car and weighs more than a large SUV … if you really want a hybrid or full electric super saloon the RS e-tron GT is the one looks wise even if it’s almost the same weight as the BMW. All of these cars are just way too heavy.

Tindersticks

279 posts

2 months

Wednesday
quotequote all
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=t9NyvdX81vA

First shot is the piano black plastic on the grill - already has swirls. On what planet is putting that on the front of a car a good idea. Imagine that after a year.

subirg

729 posts

278 months

Wednesday
quotequote all
What a disaster. Looks terrible. Weighs far too much. Way too big. Costs far too much. Pointless hybrid garbage. Built for Americans. Useless junk.

The M3 is the new M5.

honda_exige

6,178 posts

208 months

Wednesday
quotequote all
Think it says a lot that now Porsche has hybridised the 911 they've made it substantially faster and only 50kg heavier.

BMW on the otherhand have hybridised the M5 and somehow managed to make it slower and 500kg heavier. Incredible achievement that.