*** The Official Singapore Grand Prix Thread 2015 ****

*** The Official Singapore Grand Prix Thread 2015 ****

Author
Discussion

NRS

Original Poster:

22,806 posts

207 months

Monday 7th September 2015
quotequote all
Might as well continue the trend of starting the discussion on the next race just after the previous one has ended.

It looks like we will be seeing Hamilton follow his idol and get the 41 wins from 161 race starts, assuming no engine problems. Despite Rosberg having the same engine he just doesn't seem to have it in him to beat Hamilton. Will Lotus make it to the race? Will McLaren do a lot better now the engine system is less important?

Jasandjules

70,415 posts

235 months

Monday 7th September 2015
quotequote all
Again I expect Lewis will take pole and then the win. He is fairly handy when the car is good enough and I think it is fair to say it is.... Well, unless the engine goes pop of course.

Now, will Nico need to take an engine penalty or is he still within the 5/6 (?!) permitted)...

Suspect Seb will be second.....

Can't wait to see some of the lower teams who have drivers who seem rather good at the street circuits mix it up a bit too...


Mikey G

4,766 posts

246 months

Monday 7th September 2015
quotequote all
Jasandjules said:
Now, will Nico need to take an engine penalty or is he still within the 5/6 (?!) permitted)...

I believe this was engine number 2 that went pop and the new engine was only number 3, it may be salvagable but still with 2 ICE in hand for the rest of the season I dont think Merc are too worried about penalties yet.

NRS

Original Poster:

22,806 posts

207 months

Monday 7th September 2015
quotequote all
Mikey G said:
Jasandjules said:
Now, will Nico need to take an engine penalty or is he still within the 5/6 (?!) permitted)...

I believe this was engine number 2 that went pop and the new engine was only number 3, it may be salvagable but still with 2 ICE in hand for the rest of the season I dont think Merc are too worried about penalties yet.
The question then is why did they not use another new engine for Rosberg if he wasn't going to get a penalty? They may have needed another engine later, but you could just use the old one then instead. Unless it was because they didn't know what the issue with the new engine was, and were worried about reliability?

Mikey G

4,766 posts

246 months

Monday 7th September 2015
quotequote all
NRS said:
The question then is why did they not use another new engine for Rosberg if he wasn't going to get a penalty? They may have needed another engine later, but you could just use the old one then instead. Unless it was because they didn't know what the issue with the new engine was, and were worried about reliability?
Thats my take on it too, use a known good old engine instead of another unknown new unit with potentially the same problem? Or they simply didnt have any more of the upgraded new unit to put into Nico's car.
Still, nice to have so many units in hand this far into the season..

Jasandjules

70,415 posts

235 months

Monday 7th September 2015
quotequote all
NRS said:
Unless it was because they didn't know what the issue with the new engine was, and were worried about reliability?
That was my assumption. If Both Mercs had the new power unit and it went pop due to some fatal flaw.... But to have an old and a new one running they were hedging... Of course it didn't turn out like that...

HardtopManual

2,515 posts

172 months

Monday 7th September 2015
quotequote all
Anyone going? I got myself a cheapie ticket in Bay while the mrs is away at a wedding in Oz. Went last year and it was a fantastic event.

davepoth

29,395 posts

205 months

Monday 7th September 2015
quotequote all
Mikey G said:
NRS said:
The question then is why did they not use another new engine for Rosberg if he wasn't going to get a penalty? They may have needed another engine later, but you could just use the old one then instead. Unless it was because they didn't know what the issue with the new engine was, and were worried about reliability?
Thats my take on it too, use a known good old engine instead of another unknown new unit with potentially the same problem? Or they simply didnt have any more of the upgraded new unit to put into Nico's car.
Still, nice to have so many units in hand this far into the season..
I think they have all the race miles planned for each engine, but it means that each one has some miles left on it as a reserve. It's likely that at Monza the only "spare" engine (i.e. a previously used one) was the Spa one. It was that or drop some places at a race in the future.

Now, given the way the season is shaking out I think not dropping places at Abu Dhabi is going to be quite rare, and so running out of engines by then won't be much of a handicap. But I guess the plan is the plan.

Zoobeef

6,004 posts

164 months

Monday 7th September 2015
quotequote all
Have they repaired Rosberg new engine that had the water leak? If so is he now back to having the same amount of engines as Lewis but lewis has done a race with one of his?

Inertiatic

1,040 posts

196 months

Tuesday 8th September 2015
quotequote all
I believe so

theAmerican

105 posts

128 months

Tuesday 8th September 2015
quotequote all
Only 2 new spec 2016 engines were produced for Monza; there wasn't an option to use another

Scuffers

20,887 posts

280 months

Tuesday 8th September 2015
quotequote all
Zoobeef said:
Have they repaired Rosberg new engine that had the water leak? If so is he now back to having the same amount of engines as Lewis but lewis has done a race with one of his?
Apparently, it was not the engine that had the problem, but oil and water got cross-contaminated.

Last report I saw was they are going to srip the engine to check for damage (presumably bearings etc).


IainT

10,040 posts

244 months

Tuesday 8th September 2015
quotequote all
Scuffers said:
Apparently, it was not the engine that had the problem, but oil and water got cross-contaminated.
It was categorised, in one interview, as a chassis problem which seems odd but I guess the clever packaging on the cars uses channels build in to the chassis to transmit fluids.

Scuffers

20,887 posts

280 months

Tuesday 8th September 2015
quotequote all
IainT said:
It was categorised, in one interview, as a chassis problem which seems odd but I guess the clever packaging on the cars uses channels build in to the chassis to transmit fluids.
I'm thinking oil/water exchanger - maybe turbo related?

Doink

1,655 posts

153 months

Tuesday 8th September 2015
quotequote all
I'm thinking head gasket, should check the radiator cap for mayonnaise! biggrin

IainT

10,040 posts

244 months

Tuesday 8th September 2015
quotequote all
Doink said:
I'm thinking head gasket, should check the radiator cap for mayonnaise! biggrin
Reminds me of happy days owning a turbo'd rotary... cloud9

suffolk009

5,687 posts

171 months

Tuesday 8th September 2015
quotequote all
Apparently Singapore is the place where deals get done now. There are plenty of things that need sorting out for next year.

Who'll be masochistic enough to supply RBR with engines?
Will Manor get a Merc engine?
Will Renault buy Lotus?
Will Mateschitz get fed up with it all and leave F1 for good?
Will anyone buy Torro Rosso, or Force India?
Will Haas announce their drivers?
Will Honda find some power?

Interesting times...

RGambo

858 posts

175 months

Tuesday 8th September 2015
quotequote all
I Am interested to see how REDBULL go here. they have been banging on about the engine as we all know, Horner has been saying that Singapore will be their best chance, so we'll see if the chassis is up to the mark here.
If they don't perform as well as they'd like, will Renault start pointing fingers?? I'm a little disappointed to hear Merc won't supply redbull. I understand their logic, and probably if I were in their shoes, I'd take the same view, but F1 needs another team to step up and take the fight to Merc. Realistically Redbull are the only ones with the money to do it (other than Ferrari, who are getting there). If Redbull don't get a competitive PU then, I can't see beyond Mercedes for a few years yet.

Daston

6,112 posts

209 months

Thursday 10th September 2015
quotequote all
IainT said:
Reminds me of happy days owning a turbo'd rotary... cloud9
You had a headgasket on your mazda??

ajprice

28,946 posts

202 months

Thursday 10th September 2015
quotequote all
I hope things do get sorted for a lot of the 'silly season' stuff with drivers and engines. At this stage of the year though, aren't the 2016 cars going to be in the design stages? If the engines aren't finalised yet, next year could be a 'transitional year' in blue sky speak for a few teams.

Singapore then. McLaren have been saying for a while that this should be a better (I won't go as far as saying 'good') race for them. Maybe a chance of points if they can last the race. Red Bull should do better with it not being a power circuit like Spa and Monza. Still the Mercedes and Ferraris up front though.