Ross Brawn appears once more.
Discussion
kiseca said:
Unfortunately it doesn't contain Brundle who for years has been saying those thing are dangerous every time he sees one loudly stating it wasn't in any way, shape or form his fault at all, AND he has a letter from his mum ever since he (and no-one else on the track at the same time and in the same conditions) tried to crash in to one under double waved yellows.
//j17 said:
kiseca said:
Unfortunately it doesn't contain Brundle who for years has been saying those thing are dangerous every time he sees one loudly stating it wasn't in any way, shape or form his fault at all, AND he has a letter from his mum ever since he (and no-one else on the track at the same time and in the same conditions) tried to crash in to one under double waved yellows.
zac510 said:
Maybe he was asked and said he was busy? It's not jury duty.
Who knows? Does it matter why though? Either way I think it would be an opportunity for him to influence a change that he believes in. I also think it's a real shame that despite the concerns he has made quite public for years, and I do assume his opinion is as well respected within F1 as it is outside, it has still taken Bianchi's accident to instigate some action. Of course on the other hand I don't know what may have already been discussed and concluded away from the public eye about the JCBs. Before Bianchi it wouldn't have been a newsworthy topic.Vaud said:
They is a "he" - Joe Saward who blogs extensively with good insight for free. Go correct him on his blog comments - I know he loves that kind of critique...
Yes, I saw Joe's name. I assumed (incorrectly, it would appear) that the first paragraph was quoted from an FiA statement. I certainly won't be mentioning it to Joe though - I've always enjoyed reading his site.
I just thought I'd take the piss out of the FiA not being able to spell 'panel' - I don't particularly like them!
Gassing Station | Formula 1 | Top of Page | What's New | My Stuff