Anyone suspicious over F1 influences?
Discussion
I can't help being cynical but as an avid F1 fan I kind of wonder how much the whole thing is 'tweaked' to ensure maximum viewing potential and therefore revenue.
We all know that rule changes are commonplace to keep the interest up - DRS, KERS and Radio Ban etc etc but how far does this go?
Complaints of consecutive Redbull wins - do Redbull agree to have an 'off' season?
Rosberg gets punished for the crash incident - a fine apparently. Or does he accidentally overcook the corner and let lewis past? This week he happens to have an electrical problem. I wonder if the real punishment was to have the lead reduced by unexpected issues?
We all know that rule changes are commonplace to keep the interest up - DRS, KERS and Radio Ban etc etc but how far does this go?
Complaints of consecutive Redbull wins - do Redbull agree to have an 'off' season?
Rosberg gets punished for the crash incident - a fine apparently. Or does he accidentally overcook the corner and let lewis past? This week he happens to have an electrical problem. I wonder if the real punishment was to have the lead reduced by unexpected issues?
lord trumpton said:
I think some of you may be surprised how loud money can talk and exactly how much influence some people have.
So you think that the multi-billion dollar owners of the top 3 teams in F1 have been 'influenced' by the promise of a couple of million dollars from Ecclestone to throw races or championships? Get real mate. What an idiotic, moronic thread.
'nuff said.
'nuff said.
rubystone said:
So you think that the multi-billion dollar owners of the top 3 teams in F1 have been 'influenced' by the promise of a couple of million dollars from Ecclestone to throw races or championships? Get real mate.
And not forgetting all the sponsors too.Gassing Station | Formula 1 | Top of Page | What's New | My Stuff