Fabulous job by Sky F1

Fabulous job by Sky F1

Author
Discussion

ravon

Original Poster:

602 posts

288 months

Monday 7th April 2014
quotequote all
What a great weekend, Sky F1 coverage was spectacular, my congratulations, and thanks to Martin Brundle and his team .

Wanta996Gotta

5,622 posts

213 months

Monday 7th April 2014
quotequote all
ravon said:
What a great weekend, Sky F1 coverage was spectacular, my congratulations, and thanks to Martin Brundle and his team .
Have to agree, from start to finish. Not sure how the BBC tends to go forward.

iandc

3,773 posts

212 months

Monday 7th April 2014
quotequote all
Wanta996Gotta said:
Have to agree, from start to finish. Not sure how the BBC tends to go forward.
If last night's coverage is anything to go by it doesn't. I don't think the BBC gives a damn about F1.

Chrisgr31

13,665 posts

261 months

Monday 7th April 2014
quotequote all
Well I am perfectly happy with the BBC coverage, and which only costs me £145.50 a year, which I would have to pay whether I watched the coverage or not :-D

I like the mix of highlights and live coverage, I dont have the time to watch all the practice, qualifying, support races, historic races etc and even if I had Sky, yesterdays race was one I couldn't have watched live, as I had to take my daughter to swimming at 4. At least if I miss a live BBC show I can see the highlights later.

I think it will be interesting to see what happens at TV contract renewal I guess BT will want to be getting involved in the bidding so I think that is the biggest question going forward will it be on a combination of BBC and Sky or will it be on BT, or BT and BBC.

The fact that the Bahrain race was an exciting one might enocourage more people to sign up for Sky, but I won't be, and the reality is I never will. So if F1 goes over to Sky in entirity I'll give up watching it altogether.

Having a look at http://f1broadcasting.wordpress.com/ is the best place to find out viewing figures, and they have a survey of viewing habits currently.

RGambo

858 posts

175 months

Monday 7th April 2014
quotequote all
Yep, thumbs up from me.

Budweiser

1,092 posts

190 months

Monday 7th April 2014
quotequote all
I agree Sky do a great job with F1 and many other sports, well worth the money and convenience IMO.


JB8

381 posts

151 months

Monday 7th April 2014
quotequote all
The coverage is good, but why can't you just add the F1 channel to your package. I don't want to pay for the whole sky sports package to watch one race every few weeks.

scubadude

2,618 posts

203 months

Monday 7th April 2014
quotequote all
Chrisgr31 said:
and even if I had Sky, yesterdays race was one I couldn't have watched live, as I had to take my daughter to swimming at 4. At least if I miss a live BBC show I can see the highlights later.
If you had Sky you'd have Sky box which has a DVR inside and would have recorded the entire event in HD for you to watch at your leisure and a 30x FF to skip Simon Lazenby's drivel and you wouldn't have had to tolerate the BBC's butchered editing the ruined IMO the race.
(I saw both as friends came round and insisted the highlights where worth watching- they weren't having already seen the live feed)

Even if you'd missed the live race and forgotten to set it to record Sky will show it all week on repeat in-between the qualifying and practice repeats!

People are constantly slamming Sky, its abit moronic as the BBC where the ones who dropped it, had Sky not picked it up it would be nowhere. Also since my wife and kid watch Sky all the time (We only get 16 SD freeview channels here, versus 500+ on sky with 40+ in HD) its a no-brainer for £30/month, their usage makes my 1-2 times a month F1 essentially 50p/race in terms of real cost. Not to mention MotorsTV for all the GT racing!


lbc

3,254 posts

223 months

Monday 7th April 2014
quotequote all
JB8 said:
The coverage is good, but why can't you just add the F1 channel to your package. I don't want to pay for the whole sky sports package to watch one race every few weeks.
I agree with this as do probably most F1 fans.

I rarely watch any other sport on Sky apart from F1.

Sky are only interested in increasing their revenue, and don't listen to what their customers want.

belleair302

6,908 posts

213 months

Monday 7th April 2014
quotequote all
The Heineken Cup rugby was excellent his weekend.

Chrisgr31

13,665 posts

261 months

Monday 7th April 2014
quotequote all
scubadude said:
If you had Sky you'd have Sky box which has a DVR inside and would have recorded the entire event in HD for you to watch at your leisure and a 30x FF to skip Simon Lazenby's drivel and you wouldn't have had to tolerate the BBC's butchered editing the ruined IMO the race.
(I saw both as friends came round and insisted the highlights where worth watching- they weren't having already seen the live feed)

Even if you'd missed the live race and forgotten to set it to record Sky will show it all week on repeat in-between the qualifying and practice repeats!

People are constantly slamming Sky, its abit moronic as the BBC where the ones who dropped it, had Sky not picked it up it would be nowhere. Also since my wife and kid watch Sky all the time (We only get 16 SD freeview channels here, versus 500+ on sky with 40+ in HD) its a no-brainer for £30/month, their usage makes my 1-2 times a month F1 essentially 50p/race in terms of real cost. Not to mention MotorsTV for all the GT racing!
I very rarely watc a full race on time delay even when the arces were live on the BBC and they used to show the far eastern races live at stupid o'clock and a full as live repeat at a more reasonable hour. The reality is if I don't see the race live I am unlikely to have the time to watch anything other than the highlights. Equally I'd agree that if I had seen the race live I wouldn't bother with the highlights either.

I am not and have not lambasted Sky, I have been consistent in saying that Sky is not for me. I do not believe that I would get value for money from paying Sky for the priveledge of watching F1. For example I used to be a fan of WRC and BTCC, however even though I have access to both on TV I record WRC (and forget to watch it) and haven't even got round to recording BTCC.

If one watches other sport than F1 or has the time to watch some/ or all the practice, qualifying, the race, support races etc, or indeed has more disposable income or different priorities than myself then Sky might be the solution. However in my case I cannot justify it on a value for money scale so will stick to the BBC, who for me, produce a perfectly accepable product.

In my view we are lucky to have the choice of 2 options and long may those days continue.

Wh00sher

1,640 posts

224 months

Monday 7th April 2014
quotequote all
Agreed, Sky F1 coverage was excellent this weekend. smile

Enjoyed their graphics / description of the Merc Turbo setup too.

Jasandjules

70,412 posts

235 months

Monday 7th April 2014
quotequote all
I tend to enjoy it most of the time, except some of the presenters appear to neither know nor car about F1....

Daston

6,112 posts

209 months

Monday 7th April 2014
quotequote all
The one thing that annoys me about sky (even my wife commented) is the plugging for the other sport.

Sunday it was "Now showing is cricket, football and rugby" If I gave a st about any of them I wouldnt be watching the F1 would I ffs!

Crafty_

13,431 posts

206 months

Monday 7th April 2014
quotequote all
Jasandjules said:
I tend to enjoy it most of the time, except some of the presenters appear to neither know nor car about F1....
As opposed to Suzi Perry on the BBC who said exactly that until she needed a job.....