F1 change

Author
Discussion

bulla003

Original Poster:

69 posts

176 months

Monday 16th December 2013
quotequote all
if you cold change anything in formula one to make it more exciting for the fans what would you change?

personally I would make all of the teams use the same upgrade parts - except they can chose when to upgrade their f1 car based on those parts. I would also force the bbc to show live coverage of every race rather than them showing extended hightlights..


Durzel

12,429 posts

174 months

Monday 16th December 2013
quotequote all
Redesign the cars so they aren't so fragile, allowing some wheel banging action? Todays cars it's 50/50 whether you'll smash the suspension apart if you go over a kerb.

Bottle of nitrous in each car. Let the drivers choose when to use it, and how much of it each time.

FiremanRob

60 posts

131 months

Monday 16th December 2013
quotequote all
You know that when something is playing up or not working properly, you start to think of WHEN it did, and what changed since. Something like System Restore on a computer.
So when was the last time that F1 worked on an entertainment level, decide on that time, and reset the rules to then.............

ridds

8,279 posts

250 months

Monday 16th December 2013
quotequote all
Remove 50‰ of the downforce and stop them replacing it.

Eric Mc

122,685 posts

271 months

Monday 16th December 2013
quotequote all
Remove front wings entirely.

Evangelion

7,901 posts

184 months

Monday 16th December 2013
quotequote all
Remove wings.

Mr_Thyroid

1,995 posts

233 months

Monday 16th December 2013
quotequote all
Ban negative comments on forums. If noone says it, it can't be true.

Fort Jefferson

8,237 posts

228 months

Monday 16th December 2013
quotequote all
Bring back the kitty litter for them to get stuck in.

Anyone can risk any kind of overtake at the moment, because if they get it wrong, nothing happens, they just run off the track, and back on again. (exept Monaco)

daveinaravecave

1,145 posts

141 months

Monday 16th December 2013
quotequote all
I'd like to see them all in equal machinery. It will never happen though. Or will it? There's only going to be three engine manufacturers next year. Say for example one or two of them are unreliable, would the manufacturer really stay in the sport having an engine or two blowing up every weekend? It sounds far-fetched, in fact it is.

I just hope the sport returns to being interesting to watch. The F1 geriatric will croak eventually, and maybe we can start to get rid of stuff like DRS.

Adrian W

14,329 posts

234 months

Monday 16th December 2013
quotequote all
make the winner drive the slowest car in the next race.

ridds

8,279 posts

250 months

Monday 16th December 2013
quotequote all
Reverse grids too, that would be fun for laps 1 and 2....

poppopbangbang

2,061 posts

147 months

Monday 16th December 2013
quotequote all
100KG fuel load, 100 Million Euro Budget Cap which has to be audited by a third party. Everything else is free.

DanielSan

19,093 posts

173 months

Monday 16th December 2013
quotequote all
Go back to the rules of the mid 90's. the cars look great with the more simple aero but could actually get close to each other and slipstream.

budgie smuggler

5,500 posts

165 months

Monday 16th December 2013
quotequote all
Minimum ride height to get rid of ground effect.

Wings one third the size of the current ones.

No winglets or other fiddly components which when broken do not visibly change to the layman but cause enough loss of DF to lose the race.

Steel brakes to increase braking distances.

Points all the way down the grid.

Testing allowed in season.

£70m budget cap.

Some kind of manual gearbox, or at least a way to get the auto shifts wrong under pressure. I.e. some timing required.

These are just thoughts I've had through the year, probably riddled with problems but who cares?

McClure

2,173 posts

152 months

Monday 16th December 2013
quotequote all
Reduce wing size;

Ban ship to shore radio;

Allow one day's testing after each race for all except the leaders in the constructors' championship;

And of course the usual - get rid of DRS, improve the tyres and get rid of manually-operated KERS.

Some Gump

12,832 posts

192 months

Monday 16th December 2013
quotequote all
Single element front front / rear wings, with limited compound curves.
Mandated flat floor from (low) nose to 1/2 way down the engine. Floor free from that point. A 5mm straight, paralell skirt is permissable at the sides of the car.
Exhaust free, but must exit behind rearmost bodywork element.

Of course, newey et all will simply make my concept of "similar aero, but with a slipstream effect" into "unsafe we need plan c", but i tried smile

Justaredbadge

37,068 posts

194 months

Monday 16th December 2013
quotequote all
FIA designed and made rear wings. single element, low downforce.


No TC (including any variations thereof that may be argued aren't TC)

IforB

9,840 posts

235 months

Tuesday 17th December 2013
quotequote all
poppopbangbang said:
100KG fuel load, 100 Million Euro Budget Cap which has to be audited by a third party. Everything else is free.
Good thinking.

I'm all for a fixed budget and then free rules after that. If you want to spend 90% of your budget on unobtanium exhausts, then go ahead. Want to spend all of it on driver's salaries? Fill your boots..

F1 should be about who is the smartest and most devious. With Newey around, that is still the case up to a point, but it'd be great if smaller teams were able bridge the gap more easily between those who can spend their way into and out of trouble.

McClure

2,173 posts

152 months

Tuesday 17th December 2013
quotequote all
IforB said:
Good thinking.

I'm all for a fixed budget and then free rules after that. If you want to spend 90% of your budget on unobtanium exhausts, then go ahead. Want to spend all of it on driver's salaries? Fill your boots..

F1 should be about who is the smartest and most devious. With Newey around, that is still the case up to a point, but it'd be great if smaller teams were able bridge the gap more easily between those who can spend their way into and out of trouble.
I'd exclude driver salaries from the budget cap, otherwise we'd end up with a grid full of Maldonados.

egomeister

6,838 posts

269 months

Tuesday 17th December 2013
quotequote all
For me, budget caps are a non starter. All ir would serve to do is protect the status quo. How is a smaller team supposed to claw back the gap against 20+ years of cumulative investment of the larger teams? Besides I think it would be easily circumvented.

The most interesting suggestion above is to show testing. I would structure it to allow teams outside the top 5 to do a one day single car test after each race. This would give them a greater chance to catch up on the cumulative knowledge of the larger teams and/or rent the car out for some additional income.