Max Verstappen

Author
Discussion

paulguitar

24,432 posts

116 months

I think the most unacceptable thing Verstappen did was have a second lunge at Norris to 'make sure'. It happens at around 8 seconds into the video below.



Edited by paulguitar on Monday 1st July 14:50

HTP99

22,786 posts

143 months

paulguitar said:
I think the most unacceptable thing Vertappoen did was have a second lunge at Norris to 'make sure'. It happens at around 8 seconds into the video below.

Yeahh I thought that and it seems it's not been mentioned anywhere, it's looks to me as if Verstappen went for a second deliberate turn in and intentional hit on Norris to make sure Norris' race is ruined.

Sandpit Steve

10,712 posts

77 months

paulguitar said:
I think the most unacceptable thing Vertappoen did was have a second lunge at Norris to 'make sure'. It happens at around 8 seconds into the video below.

You could half believe that he moved right to get off the racing line having noticed he had a puncture - until you see his helmet clearly turned and looking in his right hand mirror at what Norris was up to, throughout the sequence. He had every intention of trying to run the McLaren off and into the wall.

Basil Brush

5,139 posts

266 months

paulguitar said:
I think the most unacceptable thing Verstappen did was have a second lunge at Norris to 'make sure'. It happens at around 8 seconds into the video below.

Edited by paulguitar on Monday 1st July 14:50
I thought the same first time I saw it but I'm not sure if the second hit was at least partially as a result of Max's puncture.

paulguitar

24,432 posts

116 months

Basil Brush said:
paulguitar said:
I think the most unacceptable thing Verstappen did was have a second lunge at Norris to 'make sure'. It happens at around 8 seconds into the video below.

Edited by paulguitar on Monday 1st July 14:50
I thought the same first time I saw it but I'm not sure if the second hit was at least partially as a result of Max's puncture.
Verstappen's onboard:





Bo_apex

2,671 posts

221 months

MustangGT said:
Bo_apex said:
MustangGT said:
heebeegeetee said:
Bo_apex said:
Muzzer79 said:
Bo_apex said:
mattikake said:
We have the MV rule for moving in braking zones, I think there now needs to be a MV punishment. If you force another car into retirement you should be automatically DSQ'd. He's extended his championship lead by 11 points. If it had finished 1-2 he's have only extended that lead by 7 points (6 with LN having fastest lap, which MV also had the opportunity to take that away from him).
Agreed. Your proposed rule should have been applied at Silverstone '21.
And Monza '21 aswell then?

Let's not go there eh?
What happens to the rule when both retire ?
What happens to the rule when stewards find both are to blame, such as Silverstone and Monza '21?
The outcome at Silverstone was dealt with in that way, a time penalty and a DNF, without the DNF it is likely a time penalty would have applied to both.
Didn't Ham apply the DNF to Max ?
No, Max applied the DNF to Max.
and yet Ham received a penalty for it

Basil Brush

5,139 posts

266 months

paulguitar said:
Basil Brush said:
paulguitar said:
I think the most unacceptable thing Verstappen did was have a second lunge at Norris to 'make sure'. It happens at around 8 seconds into the video below.

Edited by paulguitar on Monday 1st July 14:50
I thought the same first time I saw it but I'm not sure if the second hit was at least partially as a result of Max's puncture.
Verstappen's onboard:
I know he turned into Lando's car again, I just meant it may partly have been from fighting the rear of his car coming round with the tyre immediately deflating.

I'm not trying to defend him in anyway. He and Marc Marquez have way too much in common for me!

paulguitar

24,432 posts

116 months

Basil Brush said:
paulguitar said:
Basil Brush said:
paulguitar said:
I think the most unacceptable thing Verstappen did was have a second lunge at Norris to 'make sure'. It happens at around 8 seconds into the video below.

Edited by paulguitar on Monday 1st July 14:50
I thought the same first time I saw it but I'm not sure if the second hit was at least partially as a result of Max's puncture.
Verstappen's onboard:
I know he turned into Lando's car again, I just meant it may partly have been from fighting the rear of his car coming round with the tyre immediately deflating.

I'm not trying to defend him in anyway. He and Marc Marquez have way too much in common for me!
It's hard to be completely sure. Precedent suggests Verstappen has no racing morals. But yes, the puncture could have also been in play.




gmaz

4,485 posts

213 months

paulguitar said:
Verstappen's onboard:



It's amazing that he stays on the racing line after the puncture, even though he's going half the speed of the approaching cars. Seems dangerous to me.

Here's MV vs VB in 2018 doing the same thing (on the left)




Diderot

7,581 posts

195 months

What I found really revealing was that he then forced Lando on to the grass to block him from coming by. .


MarkwG

4,899 posts

192 months

Bo_apex said:
MustangGT said:
Bo_apex said:
MustangGT said:
heebeegeetee said:
Bo_apex said:
Muzzer79 said:
Bo_apex said:
mattikake said:
We have the MV rule for moving in braking zones, I think there now needs to be a MV punishment. If you force another car into retirement you should be automatically DSQ'd. He's extended his championship lead by 11 points. If it had finished 1-2 he's have only extended that lead by 7 points (6 with LN having fastest lap, which MV also had the opportunity to take that away from him).
Agreed. Your proposed rule should have been applied at Silverstone '21.
And Monza '21 aswell then?

Let's not go there eh?
What happens to the rule when both retire ?
What happens to the rule when stewards find both are to blame, such as Silverstone and Monza '21?
The outcome at Silverstone was dealt with in that way, a time penalty and a DNF, without the DNF it is likely a time penalty would have applied to both.
Didn't Ham apply the DNF to Max ?
No, Max applied the DNF to Max.
and yet Ham received a penalty for it
Because the DNF was considered penalty enough...

hot metal

1,955 posts

196 months

mattikake said:
We have the MV rule for moving in braking zones, I think there now needs to be a MV punishment. If you force another car into retirement you should be automatically DSQ'd. He's extended his championship lead by 11 points. If it had finished 1-2 he's have only extended that lead by 7 points (6 with LN having fastest lap, which MV also had the opportunity to take that away from him).
Mathematically ,a win for Max.

EmailAddress

12,522 posts

221 months

hot metal said:
mattikake said:
We have the MV rule for moving in braking zones, I think there now needs to be a MV punishment. If you force another car into retirement you should be automatically DSQ'd. He's extended his championship lead by 11 points. If it had finished 1-2 he's have only extended that lead by 7 points (6 with LN having fastest lap, which MV also had the opportunity to take that away from him).
Mathematically ,a win for Max.
Oh, like AD '21 when he would win if both drivers got taken out?

So every corner was less Curved and more [rash-u-lose.

hot metal

1,955 posts

196 months

paulguitar said:
I think the most unacceptable thing Verstappen did was have a second lunge at Norris to 'make sure'. It happens at around 8 seconds into the video below.



Edited by paulguitar on Monday 1st July 14:50
While I am not defending Max, that " second lunge" was post puncture, after the initial contact with Lando, so, the car would be a bit all over the place ,so I wouldn`t pin that on him.

EmailAddress

12,522 posts

221 months

hot metal said:
paulguitar said:
I think the most unacceptable thing Verstappen did was have a second lunge at Norris to 'make sure'. It happens at around 8 seconds into the video below.



Edited by paulguitar on Monday 1st July 14:50
While I am not defending Max, that " second lunge" was post puncture, after the initial contact with Lando, so, the car would be a bit all over the place ,so I wouldn`t pin that on him.
Watching Max's onboard, it does look like he's simply wrestling it back under control.

BunkMoreland

504 posts

10 months

spikyone said:
If you must insist on dragging up Silverstone you could at least acknowledge that the stewards decided Hamilton was not 100% to blame. Unlike yesterday, and pretty much every other collision Max has been involved in.

I wonder what the common denominator is?
Silverstone annoys me. Or rather the loud stupid opinions afterwards!

Its the first lap so no one is going to be on the racing line side by side. LH had the right to be there on the apex. or slightly out from it. All MV had to do was not just blindly turn in and expect LH to disappear or drive off the track to the inside.

Obviously all the MV fanbois blamed LH 100% for it as LH was on the inside.

Yet when a few races later at Monza and MV was on the inside and LH on the outside. And they came together. The same MV fanbois still blamed LH! The absolute irony! rolleyes

The battles with LH over the years proved to me that MV simply cannot race wheel to wheel to the same level as the all time greats of the sport. And if your peer groups know that you are incapable of being fair, eventually they get tired of you, and start using it against you in other ways.

Basil Brush said:
I know he turned into Lando's car again, I just meant it may partly have been from fighting the rear of his car coming round with the tyre immediately deflating.

I'm not trying to defend him in anyway. He and Marc Marquez have way too much in common for me!
Difference here is Marc has his daft moments. (Thought far less these days than before) But they aren't every race and they aren't every battle. He CAN race safely alongside other and not take them down. (he generally over rides and crashes himself on his own) Ironically of the current gp grid. Pecco is the one that cant handle pressure of wheel to wheel. Which is handy as the GP24 is a rocketship, and he rarely needs to.

I expect MM93 to knacker him next year

TheDeuce

22,751 posts

69 months

EmailAddress said:
hot metal said:
paulguitar said:
I think the most unacceptable thing Verstappen did was have a second lunge at Norris to 'make sure'. It happens at around 8 seconds into the video below.



Edited by paulguitar on Monday 1st July 14:50
While I am not defending Max, that " second lunge" was post puncture, after the initial contact with Lando, so, the car would be a bit all over the place ,so I wouldn`t pin that on him.
Watching Max's onboard, it does look like he's simply wrestling it back under control.
And the third unnecessary move backing into Lando's line, whilst looking in his mirror to make sure Lando was there first? Was that a result of still wrestingling the car..? scratchchin

It's just that afterwards he managed to continue at the same pace all the way back to the pits and the car didn't appear to be divebombing across the track anymore..



hot metal

1,955 posts

196 months

EmailAddress said:
hot metal said:
paulguitar said:
I think the most unacceptable thing Verstappen did was have a second lunge at Norris to 'make sure'. It happens at around 8 seconds into the video below.



Edited by paulguitar on Monday 1st July 14:50
While I am not defending Max, that " second lunge" was post puncture, after the initial contact with Lando, so, the car would be a bit all over the place ,so I wouldn`t pin that on him.
Watching Max's onboard, it does look like he's simply wrestling it back under control.
The damage had already been done though, as Davidson pointed out, he closed the door at zero notice. Max is a magician at getting the most out of a car for lap after lap but when it comes the subtleties of wheel to wheel racing , he just descends into caveman mode.

EmailAddress

12,522 posts

221 months

Okay, I only got as far as the 2nd laugh

I'll keep watching!

jules_s

4,382 posts

236 months

Just watched MV onboard (again)

He drifted right IMO. I won't knock him too much on that tbh. He had cars coming fast passing him on the left.

Lando should have just tucked in behind him (hindsight and all that)