Max Verstappen

Author
Discussion

hot metal

1,955 posts

196 months

Dave200 said:
Whenever Max comes across someone in a car with similar performance, who's willing to push him hard, we see a reversion to the old tactics.

The last minute moves under braking, the sticking the car in positions that leave the other guy no way to stay on the road, the willingness to encourage contact in the hope that someone else blinks first.

Today the other guy didn't blink, and Max ruined his own race because he couldn't consider giving up a position without playing dirty.
Back to the old Max

Tommo87

4,290 posts

116 months

hot metal said:
Dave200 said:
Whenever Max comes across someone in a car with similar performance, who's willing to push him hard, we see a reversion to the old tactics.

The last minute moves under braking, the sticking the car in positions that leave the other guy no way to stay on the road, the willingness to encourage contact in the hope that someone else blinks first.

Today the other guy didn't blink, and Max ruined his own race because he couldn't consider giving up a position without playing dirty.
Back to the old Max
yes

I watched the race with friends and everyone in the room agree that he had reverted now that his car was no longer able to pull away from the pack.

His mentality reminds me of the stereotypical road rager who upon being beeped for actually being in the wrong will swerve and force the other driver onto the kerb etc.. and then subsequently claim victim status.

And then you add in Whingers trademark flip flopping of his current opinion on everything F1 based purely on his drivers situation and you have a winning line in bozo bingo.

No other current driver or team principle acts in the same way.

mattikake

5,064 posts

202 months

We have the MV rule for moving in braking zones, I think there now needs to be a MV punishment. If you force another car into retirement you should be automatically DSQ'd. He's extended his championship lead by 11 points. If it had finished 1-2 he's have only extended that lead by 7 points (6 with LN having fastest lap, which MV also had the opportunity to take that away from him).

PhilAsia

4,046 posts

78 months

A remarkably gifted driver with the mind of a petulant four-year-old...


C5_Steve

3,676 posts

106 months

Tommo87 said:
hot metal said:
Dave200 said:
Whenever Max comes across someone in a car with similar performance, who's willing to push him hard, we see a reversion to the old tactics.

The last minute moves under braking, the sticking the car in positions that leave the other guy no way to stay on the road, the willingness to encourage contact in the hope that someone else blinks first.

Today the other guy didn't blink, and Max ruined his own race because he couldn't consider giving up a position without playing dirty.
Back to the old Max
yes

I watched the race with friends and everyone in the room agree that he had reverted now that his car was no longer able to pull away from the pack.

His mentality reminds me of the stereotypical road rager who upon being beeped for actually being in the wrong will swerve and force the other driver onto the kerb etc.. and then subsequently claim victim status.

And then you add in Whingers trademark flip flopping of his current opinion on everything F1 based purely on his drivers situation and you have a winning line in bozo bingo.

No other current driver or team principle acts in the same way.
He hasn't reverted, he never changed. We just didn't see it as he hasn't really been challenged wheel to wheel since he's had the most dominant car. Bottom line is he's never been able to race cleanly wheel to wheel and his arrogance around how he drives (fed by all those around him) is what makes him both brilliant and dangerous at the same time. The irony in his comments about dive bombing cannot be lost on the team with multiple news outlets pulling up receipts for the past 5/6 years of Max's overtakes.

Andrea Stella summed it up perfectly I thought, interested to see how this now plays out between them as Norris has been very clear what it will take to maintain the friendship.

Time4another

143 posts

6 months

The clip of Max performing the exact same move to Leclerc(?) at another Austrian GP speaks volumes. Will end up with a monster crash before any action is taken.

blueg33

36,704 posts

227 months

mattikake said:
We have the MV rule for moving in braking zones, I think there now needs to be a MV punishment. If you force another car into retirement you should be automatically DSQ'd. He's extended his championship lead by 11 points. If it had finished 1-2 he's have only extended that lead by 7 points (6 with LN having fastest lap, which MV also had the opportunity to take that away from him).
I was thinking the same. Or take from him the points the other driver would have had if MV had not been a dick

MarkwG

4,894 posts

192 months

I suspect Norris is somewhat naïve to imagine friendship with Verstappen has any value to the latter, or indeed any fellow competitor. No one's going back to the pits & telling the team, " well, I let him through, he's my friend!". Respect, mutual or otherwise, is probably as much as is reasonable.

Muzzer79

10,392 posts

190 months

Verstappen's tactics when in an overtaking battle, if left unchecked, are going to fester.

In the old days or even with another outfit, someone in the team may have a word with him. Perhaps someone he respected from another team or another driver/ex-driver might have a word with him. But he's so belligerent and Horner is so sycophantic that one can only assume that isn't happening.

The other drivers will realise, if they haven't already, that the only way to fight it is to stand up to it.

This means that it will happen again and my fear with that is that, at some point, it might get far more serious than a puncture or a broken front wing.


Bo_apex

2,661 posts

221 months

mattikake said:
We have the MV rule for moving in braking zones, I think there now needs to be a MV punishment. If you force another car into retirement you should be automatically DSQ'd. He's extended his championship lead by 11 points. If it had finished 1-2 he's have only extended that lead by 7 points (6 with LN having fastest lap, which MV also had the opportunity to take that away from him).
Agreed. Your proposed rule should have been applied at Silverstone '21.

More armco and gravel traps would also hep.




Bo_apex

2,661 posts

221 months

Norris has a fast car and just 81 points behind.

Game On !

Muzzer79

10,392 posts

190 months

Bo_apex said:
mattikake said:
We have the MV rule for moving in braking zones, I think there now needs to be a MV punishment. If you force another car into retirement you should be automatically DSQ'd. He's extended his championship lead by 11 points. If it had finished 1-2 he's have only extended that lead by 7 points (6 with LN having fastest lap, which MV also had the opportunity to take that away from him).
Agreed. Your proposed rule should have been applied at Silverstone '21.
And Monza '21 aswell then?

Let's not go there eh?

Bo_apex

2,661 posts

221 months

Muzzer79 said:
Bo_apex said:
mattikake said:
We have the MV rule for moving in braking zones, I think there now needs to be a MV punishment. If you force another car into retirement you should be automatically DSQ'd. He's extended his championship lead by 11 points. If it had finished 1-2 he's have only extended that lead by 7 points (6 with LN having fastest lap, which MV also had the opportunity to take that away from him).
Agreed. Your proposed rule should have been applied at Silverstone '21.
And Monza '21 aswell then?

Let's not go there eh?
What happens to the rule when both retire ?

Sandpit Steve

10,705 posts

77 months

Bo_apex said:
What happens to the rule when both retire ?
Then Max gets a 10-place grid penalty for the next race.

Bo_apex

2,661 posts

221 months

Sandpit Steve said:
Bo_apex said:
What happens to the rule when both retire ?
Then Max gets a 10-place grid penalty for the next race.
biggrin

How about Season DQ for "causing a collision" when the other driver finishes race ?
wink


PlywoodPascal

4,591 posts

24 months

It’s fking obvious that any attempt to intentionally cause a collision with a competitor should result in disqualification.

Bo_apex

2,661 posts

221 months

PlywoodPascal said:
It’s fking obvious that any attempt to intentionally cause a collision with a competitor should result in disqualification.
How do you substantiate "intentional" ?

Certain drivers are more crafty at concealing their intent.
While Max is pretty blunt

paulguitar

24,373 posts

116 months

Bo_apex said:
Norris has a fast car and just 81 points behind.

Game On !
Just the 81 points.




Ken_Code

1,566 posts

5 months

Bo_apex said:
How do you substantiate "intentional" ?

Certain drivers are more crafty at concealing their intent.
While Max is pretty blunt
Stewards have access to telemetry. Their job is to adjudicate on exactly this sort of thing.

spikyone

1,515 posts

103 months

Bo_apex said:
Sandpit Steve said:
Bo_apex said:
What happens to the rule when both retire ?
Then Max gets a 10-place grid penalty for the next race.
biggrin

How about Season DQ for "causing a collision" when the other driver finishes race ?
wink
If you must insist on dragging up Silverstone you could at least acknowledge that the stewards decided Hamilton was not 100% to blame. Unlike yesterday, and pretty much every other collision Max has been involved in.

I wonder what the common denominator is?