2026 F1 regs

Author
Discussion

The Hypno-Toad

12,484 posts

208 months

Thursday 6th June
quotequote all
kambites said:
They're going to have a short-term power boost for the following car instead. I wonder if it'll feel any less artificial?
Not sure. They probably need to check with Team Penske about that one.

Blib

44,558 posts

200 months

Thursday 6th June
quotequote all


The_Race's take on the 2026 regs.

WilsonWilson

537 posts

152 months

Thursday 6th June
quotequote all
Seems the details in the OP are pretty close. Wonder what has taken them so long to finalise. It's a shame that the wheel covers live on, I think they make the cars look really naff and dowdy. Especially, when teams like McLaren and Sauber paint designs on them.

Stealthracer

7,807 posts

181 months

Thursday 6th June
quotequote all
Still too bloody big.

SmoothCriminal

5,138 posts

202 months

Thursday 6th June
quotequote all
Just intime for the other teams to catch up and then boom regs change so one team dominates.

You think they'd learn after how exciting 21 was and then the absolute dross we have endured so far with max 30 seconds up the road

kambites

67,783 posts

224 months

Thursday 6th June
quotequote all
Stealthracer said:
Still too bloody big.
Yep but at least it's a (small) step in the right direction. The wheelbase is only 20cm longer than a LWB 7-series now rather than 40cm! hehe

marine boy

809 posts

181 months

Thursday 6th June
quotequote all
Sandpit Steve said:
CT05 Nose Cone said:
Concept doesn't look bad, hopefully the regulations will force the teams to actually paint them as well.
We can all blame Toto Wolff for that one, when he did the interview about weight saving and said that they asked everyone in the team how they could save weight over the winter - and the winners by far were the marketing department, who managed to go from 6kg to 3.5kg of paint and stickers, as the engineers were saving a few grams here and a few grams there.

Now everyone’s on the ‘let’s not paint the car if we can avoid it’ train.
Maybe Mercedes are slow because their lightweight 3.5kg livery job is 2.5kgs too heavy wink

ajprice

28,063 posts

199 months

Friday 7th June
quotequote all
2005 wants it's front wings back hehe




Sandpit Steve

10,705 posts

77 months

Friday 7th June
quotequote all
Those end pieces of the front wings look like they’ll give an instant puncture to any other car’s tyre that comes close to them.

CT05 Nose Cone

25,053 posts

230 months

Friday 7th June
quotequote all
marine boy said:
Sandpit Steve said:
CT05 Nose Cone said:
Concept doesn't look bad, hopefully the regulations will force the teams to actually paint them as well.
We can all blame Toto Wolff for that one, when he did the interview about weight saving and said that they asked everyone in the team how they could save weight over the winter - and the winners by far were the marketing department, who managed to go from 6kg to 3.5kg of paint and stickers, as the engineers were saving a few grams here and a few grams there.

Now everyone’s on the ‘let’s not paint the car if we can avoid it’ train.
Maybe Mercedes are slow because their lightweight 3.5kg livery job is 2.5kgs too heavy wink
Shame the marketing team didn't realise iconic liveries make new fans, and hence money

Scoobydrew95

256 posts

22 months

Friday 7th June
quotequote all
Big Nanas said:
The PU specs were agreed a couple of years ago. The same 1.6 V6.

https://www.formula1.com/en/latest/article/more-ef...
Thanks! Missed that one.

thegreenhell

15,998 posts

222 months

Friday 7th June
quotequote all

Supersam83

678 posts

148 months

Friday 7th June
quotequote all
Thoughts of Adrian Newey at his drawing board designing a monster already...

Big Nanas

1,529 posts

87 months

Friday 7th June
quotequote all
Sandpit Steve said:
Those end pieces of the front wings look like they’ll give an instant puncture to any other car’s tyre that comes close to them.
Exactly this. At first glance they look like the old narrower front wings and you think "thank god, no more annoying front wing damage", but then you see those things.... sigh.

PhilAsia

4,046 posts

78 months

Friday 7th June
quotequote all
TheDeuce said:
Cold said:
The 10mm width reduction will almost certainly mean Monaco will become an overtaking fest.
Try again...

C'mon now, we've had the metric system nearly 60 years whistle
225 years...

TheDeuce

22,724 posts

69 months

Friday 7th June
quotequote all
PhilAsia said:
TheDeuce said:
Cold said:
The 10mm width reduction will almost certainly mean Monaco will become an overtaking fest.
Try again...

C'mon now, we've had the metric system nearly 60 years whistle
225 years...
It's been the official UK system for just 60 years wink




PhilAsia

4,046 posts

78 months

Friday 7th June
quotequote all
TheDeuce said:
PhilAsia said:
TheDeuce said:
Cold said:
The 10mm width reduction will almost certainly mean Monaco will become an overtaking fest.
Try again...

C'mon now, we've had the metric system nearly 60 years whistle
225 years...
It's been the official UK system for just 60 years wink
Didn't realise it was the Royal "we" smile

hondajack85

85 posts

2 months

Friday 7th June
quotequote all
Wonder why Ross and co couldnt see the problems the last regs would cause.
A narrower front wing would have avoided all that outwash nonsense and also reduced them breaking off in a 2 car battle.
No wonder he cleared off double quick after they hit the track and bounced all over the place in a pretty stupid fashion.

budgie smuggler

Original Poster:

5,434 posts

162 months

Friday 7th June
quotequote all
A slightly more positive take on it by Mark Hughes

https://www.motorsportmagazine.com/articles/uncate...

Crudeoink

521 posts

62 months

Friday 7th June
quotequote all
X mode, Z mode, push to pass and big batteries. It really does seem like a step closer to Formula E, at least we dont have the 'Fan Boost' and 'Attack Mode' rubbish yet. Nonetheless hopefully we'll see a shakeup in the order for a bit!