Croft has to go
Discussion
Kyp said:
Gary29 said:
Unanimous seal of approval on here for the new guy then.
Let's hope the non PH masses feel the same.
Is anyone at Sky listening, or even reading this forum?!Let's hope the non PH masses feel the same.
Edited by Kyp on Wednesday 22 May 08:04
They want a shouty bloke for the masses, not for the <1% that have a good understanding of the sport and can spot the holes in the nonsense the guy shouts.
t, this is going to be painful TheDeuce said:
Kyp said:
Gary29 said:
Unanimous seal of approval on here for the new guy then.
Let's hope the non PH masses feel the same.
Is anyone at Sky listening, or even reading this forum?!Let's hope the non PH masses feel the same.
Edited by Kyp on Wednesday 22 May 08:04
They want a shouty bloke for the masses, not for the <1% that have a good understanding of the sport and can spot the holes in the nonsense the guy shouts.
Mark V GTD said:
Do the ‘masses’ pay to watch Sky F1? I thought that being a subscription service the audience would be largely enthusiasts.
It's the law of inverse affordability.The poorer and more stupid the individual, the more likely they are to have Sky and every possible sports channel.
Croft is for the army of men that have an England flag hung out their bedroom window, a piss stained mattress in the front garden and a house that permanently smells of chips.
TheDeuce said:
It's the law of inverse affordability.
The poorer and more stupid the individual, the more likely they are to have Sky and every possible sports channel.
Croft is for the army of men that have an England flag hung out their bedroom window, a piss stained mattress in the front garden and a house that permanently smells of chips.
Speak for yourself.The poorer and more stupid the individual, the more likely they are to have Sky and every possible sports channel.
Croft is for the army of men that have an England flag hung out their bedroom window, a piss stained mattress in the front garden and a house that permanently smells of chips.
What a horrible prejudiced view that is.
732NM said:
TheDeuce said:
It's the law of inverse affordability.
The poorer and more stupid the individual, the more likely they are to have Sky and every possible sports channel.
Croft is for the army of men that have an England flag hung out their bedroom window, a piss stained mattress in the front garden and a house that permanently smells of chips.
Speak for yourself.The poorer and more stupid the individual, the more likely they are to have Sky and every possible sports channel.
Croft is for the army of men that have an England flag hung out their bedroom window, a piss stained mattress in the front garden and a house that permanently smells of chips.
What a horrible prejudiced view that is.
732NM said:
TheDeuce said:
It's the law of inverse affordability.
The poorer and more stupid the individual, the more likely they are to have Sky and every possible sports channel.
Croft is for the army of men that have an England flag hung out their bedroom window, a piss stained mattress in the front garden and a house that permanently smells of chips.
Speak for yourself.The poorer and more stupid the individual, the more likely they are to have Sky and every possible sports channel.
Croft is for the army of men that have an England flag hung out their bedroom window, a piss stained mattress in the front garden and a house that permanently smells of chips.
What a horrible prejudiced view that is.
Gassing Station | Formula 1 | Top of Page | What's New | My Stuff