Optimax: Proven to be better

Optimax: Proven to be better

Author
Discussion

jeremyc

Original Poster:

24,537 posts

291 months

Wednesday 1st May 2002
quotequote all
Great article in this month's EVO (044) testing (quantitatively and qualitatively) Shell's claims for Optimax.

They found:
- it cleans up inlet valves so improving combustion efficiency
- improves measured performance
- subjective improvements in smoothness, response and driveability
- a slight deterioration in fuel economy

They tested the fuel in a Civic Type-R, BMW M Coupe and Jaguar XJR-R back-to-back with non-Optimax unleaded (1500 miles with each).

Seems to match what I have found using it - perhaps this signals an end to the debate?

holbrooknr

167 posts

278 months

Wednesday 1st May 2002
quotequote all
did they test it against normal UL, SUL or both?

jeremyc

Original Poster:

24,537 posts

291 months

Wednesday 1st May 2002
quotequote all
quote:
did they test it against normal UL, SUL or both?

Whatever the cars had been run on before: CTR mostly supermarket UL, Jag & BMW a mixture of UL & occasional SUL.

>> Edited by jeremyc on Wednesday 1st May 16:43

VTECDave

2,005 posts

288 months

Wednesday 1st May 2002
quotequote all
A few weeks ago I travelled from Dumfries (SW Scotland) to Doncaster with bog standard U/L.

Before the return journey I filled up with Optimax.

The car run smoother, pulled better from low revs, and seems a little more economical depite the average speed being higher and at one point being close to the manufacturer's book top speed for a very sort distance.

Well done shell.