I am ashamed to admit that I want a Fiat X1/9. Am I mad?

I am ashamed to admit that I want a Fiat X1/9. Am I mad?

Author
Discussion

Pat H

Original Poster:

8,058 posts

261 months

Monday 12th June 2006
quotequote all
For some inexplicable reason I quite fancy one of Bertone's diminutive wedges of seventies cheese.

Rear wheel drive, mid engined, wind in the hair motoring, loads of character, no depreciation....

Suitable for cheap fun motoring with the occasional track day?

I have tripped up over one that isn't rotten, and whilst the same money would buy a decent MR2 or MX5, I am drawn by the little Fiat.

Has anyone out there owned one?

Are they a dreadful, rotten, nasty, camp and unpleasant device, or are they an overlooked classic?



Smartie

2,606 posts

278 months

Monday 12th June 2006
quotequote all
i've had 2 (though years ago). You need to really want one as the MR2 is so much better.

They do rot, generally run badly (not entirely due to the timing being virtually impossible to adjust with the engine fitted (though there is a access panel (of sorts) behind the drivers seat))

Lots of electrical problems, (bet the headlights dont pop up anymore) and not that quick.

Also bet there is a rather damp/stale smell from the seats!

Good luck!

Sam_68

9,939 posts

250 months

Monday 12th June 2006
quotequote all
The first car I bought myself was an X1/9.

They are underpowered by modern standards (only 85bhp for a standard 1500; 0-60 takes around 10 seconds and they are flat out at 112mph). Gearchange is fairly imprecise, due to the mid-engined configuration, but provided you don't suddenly lift off the accelerator mid-bend, the handling is excellent and the steering light and precise.

They are a superbly packaged design - the cockpit and driving position feel sporty, the targa roof works superbly and there is even decent lugage space in the front and rear boots. Mechanical access to the engine is poor, though, and I think you'd find the brakes pretty feeble for track use.

Worst problem was always rust, so if you have found one without tinworm, it would make an interesting and characterful little sportscar.

danhay

7,460 posts

261 months

Monday 12th June 2006
quotequote all
I had one some years ago. They truly are like a baby Ferrari of the 70's. They mostly have the same good points and bad points. Obvioulsy the X1/9 is slower, but it is cheaper to maintain.

They are still a teensy bit camp though!

Uriel

3,244 posts

256 months

Monday 12th June 2006
quotequote all
Nothing to be ashamed about in wanting one of those.

My first and second cars were X1/9s and I'd have another in a second if I had the space and could fit in them a little easier.

blaineuk

2,615 posts

252 months

Monday 12th June 2006
quotequote all
get it a stick a uno turbo engine or twin cam, one is a straight swap

Sam_68

9,939 posts

250 months

Monday 12th June 2006
quotequote all
blaineuk said:
get it a stick a uno turbo engine or twin cam, one is a straight swap


I think you'll find it's a wee bit more complicated than that! Both conversions are well documented and the X1/9 owners club will be able to advise if you want to go down this route, but neither is straightforward.

bimsb6

8,120 posts

226 months

Monday 12th June 2006
quotequote all
i had one and loved it, you can drift them really easily in the wet very controllable ! bad points as already
listed mine also used to vibrate its main jet out and vibrate the fuel pump loose ! would prefer a lancia monte carlo but both are favourite food of the rust worm.

iain_cam

689 posts

235 months

Tuesday 13th June 2006
quotequote all
Don't know much about the cars themselves, but my mother had one when they were new and loved it! Cheap to buy, run, and service (at the time) it was one of her favourite cars. I love this type -



Is this a bodykit for the standard car or is it a special edition?

lazyitus

19,926 posts

271 months

Tuesday 13th June 2006
quotequote all
They're ace, Pat !

Make the purchase.

r5gttgaz

7,897 posts

225 months

Tuesday 13th June 2006
quotequote all
Twin cam lumps fitted to the likes of the Abarth 130TC Strada are easily available, however it will be one hell of a squeeze!

Pat H

Original Poster:

8,058 posts

261 months

Tuesday 13th June 2006
quotequote all
Sam_68 said:
Worst problem was always rust.....

You aren't kidding.

They are even worse than an old Mini.

I can't remember the last time I saw an X1/9 that wasn't completely shot, which is why this solid one is tempting me.

One previous owner, 20,000 miles, near concours condition, £3500.

It's a lot of cash for an X1/9. Should I walk away, or give it a whirl for a year or two?

Decisions, decisions....

Julian64

14,317 posts

259 months

Tuesday 13th June 2006
quotequote all
Tis a lot of money for the car, but my decision would be made based on whether it had the ugly american bumper or not. The original bumper I had was very svelt. I would also check someone had seen the light and removed the mechanical voltage control unit and replaced it with electric.

I remember being stopped by a jag BIB traf car in leeds which pulled up to my house a good 30 secs after I arrived and duly sat me in the back of his car telling me he'd been unable to catch up with me over the last ten minutes of driving.

I learnt everything I know about cars from that as my first car and a lancia montecarlo as my second. Heeltoe/clutch all makes sense in those two cars in a way that it just doesn't with todays batch of cars.

I wouldn't believe the bodywork was in good condition until my magnet said so

cossie.

7,977 posts

254 months

Tuesday 13th June 2006
quotequote all
Pat H said:
Should I walk away, or give it a whirl for a year or two?

Decisions, decisions....



Life's too short - GO FOR IT.

FWIW I like the X1/9 - it's cute!

mechsympathy

53,900 posts

260 months

Tuesday 13th June 2006
quotequote all
£3.5k That is a whole heap of cash waiting to rust itself onto your driveway.

Smartie said:
You need to really want one as the MR2 is so much better.


It's like an X1/9 but made in Japan, better in every way barring (argueably) character.

LuS1fer

41,522 posts

250 months

Tuesday 13th June 2006
quotequote all
It's a nice car but the steel quality is appalling so they dissolve, the gearshifter is a bit too phallic not to get embarrassed about and however great the handling is, they are massively underpowered so any warm hatch will be all over it like a rash. I can see Fiat reinventing that one soon.

Guzzi Steve

246 posts

246 months

Tuesday 13th June 2006
quotequote all
As a piece of design they are excellent.Mid engined 2 seater with plenty of luggage space front,& rear.Try that on yer MR2.I owned a 1987 1500 for six years,& it was great.I only sold it due to wifey getting pregnant.Mine had no rust at all but I looked after it,& it was always garaged.They are not fast it's true,mine had a Stainless Quicksilver exhaust.(Recommended) if they are still made.It also had a four branch manifold,K&N & modified carb.It went well,& sounded like a raspy Italian sports car should .
Things that weren't so great.The brakes are unservoed,& feel wooden.The calipers seize up if you so much as breath on them too.Mine had the later external adjusting dizzy,with cassette type points.A doddle to set up with a dwell meter.They can be tricky to handle in the wet.The front end locks up very easily,prolly down to lack of weight.They are'nt that hard to work on,prolly exept for.Kunifer brake pipe replacement,& the big coolant pipes under the car.But you don't change those every day eh! If you like them go for it. They are great little cars.


Edited by Guzzi Steve on Tuesday 13th June 11:35

r988

7,495 posts

234 months

Tuesday 13th June 2006
quotequote all
But you already have a Ferrari 328 or are you selling that for something cheaper to run?

Podie

46,642 posts

280 months

Tuesday 13th June 2006
quotequote all
X1/9 .... with a bike engine!

mechsympathy

53,900 posts

260 months

Tuesday 13th June 2006
quotequote all
Guzzi Steve said:
Try that on yer MR2.


I regularly used to go away with a friend for weekends camping/climbing in mine (Mk1). And still took the full size spare too.