A brief history of time?

Author
Discussion

briangriffin

Original Poster:

1,685 posts

174 months

Monday 11th September 2017
quotequote all
Anyone read it? I'm not stupid but I'm not overly intelligent especially when it comes to technical sciences, algorithms and maths. Is a relative laymen going to be ok with this?


Ayahuasca

27,428 posts

285 months

Monday 11th September 2017
quotequote all
Yes, and no.

Einion Yrth

19,575 posts

250 months

Tuesday 12th September 2017
quotequote all
I've read it, didn't find it terribly challenging; just give it a go, third entry in a google search was to an online pdf, so no investment needed.

welshjon81

639 posts

147 months

Tuesday 12th September 2017
quotequote all
I've read it. For some parts you would need a deeper understanding of physics to grasp (I have a physics degree) but others parts are quite simple.

If you are struggling try A Briefer History of Time. I preferred A Grand Design overall though.

skeeterm5

3,569 posts

194 months

Sunday 17th September 2017
quotequote all
briangriffin said:
Is a relative laymen going to be ok with this?
Great pun!! smile

g3org3y

20,911 posts

197 months

Sunday 17th September 2017
quotequote all
Read it a number of years ago. It's ok, but imo there are other books on the subject written in a more 'user friendly' way if no background scientific knowledge. Check out Marcus Chown's work.

TheJimi

25,548 posts

249 months

Friday 6th October 2017
quotequote all
skeeterm5 said:
briangriffin said:
Is a relative laymen going to be ok with this?
Great pun!! smile
In theory. He may not have meant it smile

Nom de ploom

4,890 posts

180 months

Friday 6th October 2017
quotequote all
I'd say give it a go as well I found the first few chapters ok - I've read a lot of popular science books, Gliek, Gell-Mann, Sagan etc but after a few chapters it lost me a bit.

the concept of a particle behaving like a partical and a wave at the same time invited parrots of the whoosh variety...


mko9

2,617 posts

218 months

Friday 6th October 2017
quotequote all
It seemed to me that each successive chapter was a little bit more challenging, a little harder to wrap my head around. The first few chapters are pretty basic stuff that I could probably have written myself. The last chapter or two, i was just taking his word for it.

CubanPete

3,636 posts

194 months

Friday 6th October 2017
quotequote all
I read it at school, don't remember it being overly difficult.

As an irritating 17 year old it made for a comedy conversation with some jehovas witnesses who tapped on the door a couple of days after I finished it (having already explained my parents were out giving blood...)

Nom de ploom

4,890 posts

180 months

Friday 13th October 2017
quotequote all
^^^^^^ hehe


marcosgt

11,078 posts

182 months

Friday 13th October 2017
quotequote all
TheJimi said:
In theory. He may not have meant it smile
Surely in some alternative universe he did and didn't...

Or is that another book? biggrin

I've not tried to read it, but funnily enough I mentioned this to my B-I-L yesterday who said he struggled with latter parts of the book.

I scraped a C in 'O' Level Physics, so I suspect it would be a bit of a stretch for me!

M