Transit - FWD vs RWD
Discussion
I'm picking some stuff up for work soon, which involves hiring a van. Nothing too heavy - just too bulky for a car.
Never driven a van before and am quite excited (sad, I know!).
Originally I chose a "medium van" which is listed as a Ford Transit 280 SWB FWD Low Roof. I've just realised for an extra £10 I could of gotten a "large van" instead, a Ford Transit 350 LWB RWD High Roof. Both are listed with the 2.2 TDCi 100ps engine.
The high-roof model has slightly worse MPG (32 vs 40) but the companies paying for the fuel anyway.
Is a RWD transit going to be the pinnacle of driving excellence vs FWD, or am I just never going to notice?
Never driven a van before and am quite excited (sad, I know!).
Originally I chose a "medium van" which is listed as a Ford Transit 280 SWB FWD Low Roof. I've just realised for an extra £10 I could of gotten a "large van" instead, a Ford Transit 350 LWB RWD High Roof. Both are listed with the 2.2 TDCi 100ps engine.
The high-roof model has slightly worse MPG (32 vs 40) but the companies paying for the fuel anyway.
Is a RWD transit going to be the pinnacle of driving excellence vs FWD, or am I just never going to notice?
golfer19 said:
No real difference between the two.
You may be surprised how well a Transit drives.
The current (2007ish-onward) model is astoundingly pleasant to drive, even in base model flatbed form with a 90bhp engine. It's light years ahead of the previous one, which in turn was leagues ahead of the 1990s "smiley face" Transits. RWD ones are marginally less refined, I've found, but the difference is very minor.You may be surprised how well a Transit drives.
kiethton said:
You will not notice a thing...except for the larger turning circle (and extra care) needed with the longer van
however the rwd may have better steering lock than the FWD or AWD ( as iirc there is now a factory AWD Transit)... but that would require someone with a more intimate knowledge of Transit oily bits to comment on the simialrity / differences between the front axles when driven or undriven ... bigger worry with the longer van may be tail swing ... inside 'cut in' (source of the scrapes in front of nearside rear wheel on vans and ambis) is much the same between FWD and RWD vans
Ended up with an 85 HP FWD Transit.
Suprisingly fun to hustle along (it feels wrong to make something that big travel briskly down a country road), excellent turning circle too which I wasn't expecting. The engine was a bit of a let down on the motorway (75 was about as much as it wanted to do before giving up all pretences of comfort!) but for a few fleeting moments in 3rd felt surprisingly punchy.
Gassing Station | Commercial Break | Top of Page | What's New | My Stuff