Four Lorry Crash, M1 Northbound
Discussion
pacman1 said:
No Stobart drive meself. I was referring to the 'lounge' style of posting you latterly mentioned. CW clearly didn't read the article, or he wouldn't have posted the comment he did.
The accident had nothing to do with the Stobart driver.
Call me pedantic, but I think you'll find it did...The accident had nothing to do with the Stobart driver.
mybrainhurts said:
pacman1 said:
No Stobart drive meself. I was referring to the 'lounge' style of posting you latterly mentioned. CW clearly didn't read the article, or he wouldn't have posted the comment he did.
The accident had nothing to do with the Stobart driver.
Call me pedantic, but I think you'll find it did...The accident had nothing to do with the Stobart driver.
pacman1 said:
No Stobart drive meself. I was referring to the 'lounge' style of posting you latterly mentioned. CW clearly didn't read the article, or he wouldn't have posted the comment he did.
The accident had nothing to do with the Stobart driver.
Calm down poppet, I was just being "funny".The accident had nothing to do with the Stobart driver.
R0G said:
If TOOOOOO slow then that would be a hazard
I don't understand this 'plough on regardless of visibility, it's a motorway so there shouldn't be anything to hit' attitude. Motorways are not immune to queuing traffic/carriageway obstructions/other people having accidents. If these lorries had struck the back of a queue, would we be criticising the queuing vehicles like we are the (possibly non-existent) red car driver?
Drivers come a cropper in not able to stop in the distance they can see to be clear shocker.
Gassing Station | Commercial Break | Top of Page | What's New | My Stuff