Measuring with a Micrometer

Measuring with a Micrometer

Author
Discussion

nigel_bytes

Original Poster:

557 posts

243 months

Friday 29th November 2013
quotequote all
I picked this up on the Sunday market but I'm unsure how to measure with it.



5 tenths would be 0.5" (500 thou) ?
plus 2 divisions would be 0.040" (40 thou)?
plus thimble reading, 12 thou, plus 2x 4 ten thous (0.0008) ?

So how would this be written in inches ? 0.5528" ?
A little bit confusing for me,

benters

1,459 posts

141 months

Friday 29th November 2013
quotequote all
thought each division was 25 thou. . .

benters

1,459 posts

141 months

Friday 29th November 2013
quotequote all
so half an inch is 500 thou
2 division would be a further 50 thou
thimble reading 12 thou
so
in total
.562

Edited by benters on Friday 29th November 16:48


Edited by benters on Friday 29th November 16:48

rustandoil

89 posts

179 months

Friday 29th November 2013
quotequote all
0.564

Snake the Sniper

2,544 posts

208 months

Friday 29th November 2013
quotequote all
I'd say you got it right the first time. I read it the same way you do:

0.500"
0.040"
0.012"
0.0008"
= 0.5528"

honestbob

316 posts

241 months

Friday 29th November 2013
quotequote all
These dual reading mics came out in the early seventies but never truly
took off.
Yes the correct reading is 0.5528". The fun starts with the metric reading
as the Zero datum line is on a spiral in red which wraps around the barrel
reading in whole mm's. Around the thimble are the tenths and hundredths.
The theory was a 50 TPI thread giving 20 thou divisions. This was very close to
19 and a bit thous for 1/2 mm. So to make it read correct the spiral datum line
came into play correcting the accrued error.
My job at the time was a machine shop training instructor and saw more scrapped
work due to misreading than was necessary.

littleredrooster

5,707 posts

203 months

Saturday 30th November 2013
quotequote all
Good grief! I'm glad I served my apprenticeship before they came out! Couldn't get me head around that for very long!

Evoluzione

10,345 posts

250 months

Sunday 1st December 2013
quotequote all
honestbob said:
My job at the time was a machine shop training instructor and saw more scrapped
work due to misreading than was necessary.
Just use a digital, if you get it wrong with one of those you need serious help!

nigel_bytes

Original Poster:

557 posts

243 months

Sunday 1st December 2013
quotequote all
Evoluzione said:
Just use a digital, if you get it wrong with one of those you need serious help!
Were digital around in the early 70s ? or do you mean these,



rustandoil

89 posts

179 months

Sunday 1st December 2013
quotequote all
^^^ that looks interesting, got any more info?

honestbob

316 posts

241 months

Sunday 1st December 2013
quotequote all
Evoluzione said:
honestbob said:
My job at the time was a machine shop training instructor and saw more scrapped
work due to misreading than was necessary.
Just use a digital, if you get it wrong with one of those you need serious help!
If you tried to get a digital in the early seventies all you would have got
was a doctors finger up your jacksie checking out your prostate.

nigel_bytes

Original Poster:

557 posts

243 months

Sunday 1st December 2013
quotequote all
It's made by Moore and wright,



Patent No: GB595016
595,016. Gauging-devices. MOORE & WRIGHT (SHEFFIELD), Ltd., and MORRISON, A. E. March 28, 1945, No. 7827. [Class 83 (iii)] [Also in Group XIX] A micrometer device has a screw-threaded spindle which is rotated by means of a drum provided with Braille graduations on its periphery which co-operate with a datum mark, perceptible by touch, on a stationary member adjacent to the drum. In a machine tool slide, a base 51 carries a slide 54 which is engaged and traversed by a nut 55 on a feed screw 50, on which are mounted three drums 16, 17, 18. The drum 18 is secured to the screw 50 and the drum 17 is held against rotation by means of a bracket 52. The drums 16 and 17 have toothed inner peripheries engaged by two planet wheels carried by a spindle mounted in a bearing formed as a radial extension of a sleeve secured to the screw 50 and, in this manner, the drum 16 is caused to rotate, for example, one-fortieth of a revolution for each complete revolution of the drum 18. Raised graduations on the peripheries of the drums 16 and 18, on which the zero marks are preferably raised lines, cooperate with a raised datum line on the centre stationary drum 17, which is also provided with a set of vernier graduations. The drums 16 and 18 have forty and twenty-five graduations indicated by Braille characters respectively, those on the drum 16 being indicated in ten groups of four and those on the drum 18 in five groups of five. A micrometer and a micrometer comparator (see Group XIX) incorporating the device are also described.

http://worldwide.espacenet.com/publicationDetails/...

Evoluzione

10,345 posts

250 months

Sunday 1st December 2013
quotequote all
I wasn't up to measuring much in the 70s. wink

Are you a collector or buying them for serious use?