1x1=... 2, right?

Author
Discussion

Upinflames

Original Poster:

1,740 posts

181 months

Thursday 30th May
quotequote all
Quite an interesting exploration into the peculiarities of the square root of 2


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zloGu1tBThY

s1962a

5,461 posts

165 months

Thursday 30th May
quotequote all
I see some videos on YT about this - Dean Howard (the actor) making his case about the assumptions we make in maths not being correct. I think it has been debunked but i'm no expert.

Upinflames

Original Poster:

1,740 posts

181 months

Thursday 30th May
quotequote all
s1962a said:
I see some videos on YT about this - Dean Howard (the actor) making his case about the assumptions we make in maths not being correct. I think it has been debunked but i'm no expert.
Terrence Howard?

Yeah he was on Joe Rogan, I'm halfway through, it's interesting

Eric Mc

122,399 posts

268 months

Thursday 30th May
quotequote all
Lunacy.

MBBlat

1,713 posts

152 months

Thursday 30th May
quotequote all
Is he still trying to argue that he should have been paid more than Robert Downy Jr. for Iron Man 2, and has thus had to invent new maths to right that obvious, in his mind, wrong? Obviously being in one film once men’s he must be paid twice rofl

Already ripped to shreds by Professor Dave explains https://youtu.be/lWAyfr3gxMA?si=by_fnY_gZNjIJxv6

Otispunkmeyer

12,723 posts

158 months

Thursday 30th May
quotequote all
is this like that sum of numbers to infinity = -1/12?

https://youtu.be/w-I6XTVZXww?si=CAmgJHBB7l1ZPYsy

g3org3y

20,786 posts

194 months

Yesterday (07:43)
quotequote all
Eric Weinstein explains to Terrence Howard why he's wrong.


annodomini2

6,887 posts

254 months

Yesterday (07:50)
quotequote all

thebraketester

14,396 posts

141 months

Yesterday (08:02)
quotequote all
Upinflames said:
Quite an interesting exploration into the peculiarities of the square root of 2


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zloGu1tBThY
12 mins of word/math salad.

g3org3y

20,786 posts

194 months

Yesterday (08:05)
quotequote all
annodomini2 said:
They actually go through this response in the JRE interview I linked (about 3hrs 28 mins in).

juliussneezer

131 posts

5 months

Yesterday (08:51)
quotequote all

thebraketester

14,396 posts

141 months

Yesterday (08:52)
quotequote all

DanL

6,329 posts

268 months

Yesterday (09:04)
quotequote all
juliussneezer said:
Consigned to the dustbin here:

I do like this lady - she turns up in my YouTube recommendations from time to time.

Happily she puts the whole thing to bed at 1:20 (so you don’t have to listen to the whole thing), explaining very neatly why 1x1 (obviously) = 1. She then does go into where he’s made some wrong assumptions and so on, neatly debunking the whole thing.

timbo999

1,305 posts

258 months

Yesterday (09:52)
quotequote all
What does the guy say when you ask him, if 1x1=2, what does 2x1 equal?

Eric Mc

122,399 posts

268 months

Joe Rogan is the real villain in that he gives a platform to these loons.

g3org3y

20,786 posts

194 months

Eric Mc said:
Joe Rogan is the real villain in that he gives a platform to these loons.
I disagree. If you watched the follow up episode with Eric Weinstein, I think that was a very fair and reasonable way to handle things. JR barely spoke in that episode.

Eric is super smart and treated Terrence Howard with a good degree of respect but was happy to tell him that he was speaking ste.

Same with Hancock who has been on the show a few times (ancient civilisations etc) and got dismantled by Flint Dibble.

Edited by g3org3y on Monday 8th July 18:05

Eric Mc

122,399 posts

268 months

Giving idiots an equal platform with people who know their stuff is totally wrong, in my view.

Neill deGrasse Tyson tried to be civil with this moron but once he pointed out to him how stupid his ideas are , which he did in a very mannerly way, he cut him off.
That was eight years ago and this fool is still peddling his nonsense.
Rogan is a dangerous idiot himself for giving this cretin a voice,

Super Sonic

5,664 posts

57 months

Probably not a good idea to use YouTube as a reference source. At least not without a cross reference.