On walking quickly

Author
Discussion

Simpo Two

Original Poster:

87,054 posts

272 months

Saturday 7th September
quotequote all
A friend of mine is convinced that tall people walk faster than short people because their feet are bigger. She says that if their feet are, say, 3" longer than the short person's, every step is 3" longer.

I tried explaining that they walk faster because their stride is longer because they have longer legs, but she was insistent that they still gain an extra 3" with every step. It doesn't make sense to me but I couldn't find a way to explain it. Can you?

Super Sonic

7,239 posts

61 months

Saturday 7th September
quotequote all
The total distance per step is distance between footprints plus length of footprints.

Simpo Two

Original Poster:

87,054 posts

272 months

Saturday 7th September
quotequote all
Super Sonic said:
The total distance per step is distance between footprints plus length of footprints.
That makes sense. But if I wear clown shoes my footprints will be longer but I won't travel any faster...

miniman

26,303 posts

269 months

Saturday 7th September
quotequote all
So we know that Krusty has small feet but big shoes. Does he travel further per stride? scratchchin



ETA - great minds hehe

CanAm

10,045 posts

279 months

Saturday 7th September
quotequote all
Super Sonic said:
The total distance per step is distance between footprints plus length of footprints.
But that isn't the stride length.

ChocolateFrog

28,614 posts

180 months

Saturday 7th September
quotequote all
CanAm said:
Super Sonic said:
The total distance per step is distance between footprints plus length of footprints.
But that isn't the stride length.
I love how they have proclaimed such utter claptrap so confidently.

hehe

Off to win the Olympics with my size 50 UK shoes.

Bill

54,239 posts

262 months

Saturday 7th September
quotequote all
Most people walk by landing on their heel and transfering their weight onto the ball of the foot, lifting their heel and pushing off for the next step. So the length of the foot is an integral component of stride length.

Whether that means a longer foot is quicker or not probably has all sorts of variables and I suspect there is an optimal foot length for speed and too long/too short is slower.

hondajack85

271 posts

6 months

Saturday 7th September
quotequote all
Long stroke engine has higher piston speed and will reach the safe limit at lower revs than an oversquare shortarse.

wibble cb

3,749 posts

214 months

Saturday 7th September
quotequote all
I'm 6ft 5, my wife can't keep up with me when walking ( she is 5ft 1)......I find most people can't keep up with me!

thebraketester

14,703 posts

145 months

Saturday 7th September
quotequote all
Simpo Two said:
A friend of mine is convinced that tall people walk faster than short people because their feet are bigger. She says that if their feet are, say, 3" longer than the short person's, every step is 3" longer.

I tried explaining that they walk faster because their stride is longer because they have longer legs, but she was insistent that they still gain an extra 3" with every step. It doesn't make sense to me but I couldn't find a way to explain it. Can you?
Ask her to explain why I can walk faster on stilts with a "foot" length of 1" vs someone with size 13 feet.

Super Sonic

7,239 posts

61 months

Saturday 7th September
quotequote all
CanAm said:
But that isn't the stride length.
It's the pitch, aka the distance between the start of one footprint and the start of the next, which defines how far you travel per stride.

Super Sonic

7,239 posts

61 months

Saturday 7th September
quotequote all
ChocolateFrog said:
CanAm said:
Super Sonic said:
The total distance per step is distance between footprints plus length of footprints.
But that isn't the stride length.
I love how they have proclaimed such utter claptrap so confidently.
Care to explain why you think it's claptrap, bearing in mind you don't put your feet flat on the floor when walking, you put your heel down first and 'roll' your foot forward lifting the toe last, with your body moving forward while doing so. Or are you claiming the length of the foot isn't included in the distance travelled in a step, just the distance between footprints?

Super Sonic

7,239 posts

61 months

Saturday 7th September
quotequote all
thebraketester said:
Ask her to explain why I can walk faster on stilts with a "foot" length of 1" vs someone with size 13 feet.
Again, step length + footprint.
On stilts you gain a couple of feet or so in a stride, which more than compensates for the foot or so you lose in foot length

marksx

5,118 posts

197 months

Saturday 7th September
quotequote all
Super Sonic said:
ChocolateFrog said:
CanAm said:
Super Sonic said:
The total distance per step is distance between footprints plus length of footprints.
But that isn't the stride length.
I love how they have proclaimed such utter claptrap so confidently.
Care to explain why you think it's claptrap, bearing in mind you don't put your feet flat on the floor when walking, you put your heel down first and 'roll' your foot forward lifting the toe last, with your body moving forward while doing so. Or are you claiming the length of the foot isn't included in the distance travelled in a step, just the distance between footprints?
Put your heels against a wall and stride forward until your heels are together. You've travelled that ~1m heel to heel. Not to the end of your toes.

thebraketester

14,703 posts

145 months

Saturday 7th September
quotequote all
Super Sonic said:
thebraketester said:
Ask her to explain why I can walk faster on stilts with a "foot" length of 1" vs someone with size 13 feet.
Again, step length + footprint.
On stilts you gain a couple of feet or so in a stride, which more than compensates for the foot or so you lose in foot length
So the OPs friend is wrong.

Super Sonic

7,239 posts

61 months

Saturday 7th September
quotequote all
marksx said:
Put your heels against a wall and stride forward until your heels are together. You've travelled that ~1m heel to heel. Not to the end of your toes.
Except nobody actually walks like that, putting their feet next to each other every step...
Stand against a wall and take ten steps, then put your feet together.
If your feet are a foot long, and you're footsteps are two feet apart, how far have you travelled?
ETA boundary conditions.

Edited by Super Sonic on Saturday 7th September 22:34

thegreenhell

17,223 posts

226 months

Saturday 7th September
quotequote all
Super Sonic said:
Except nobody actually walks like that, putting their feet next to each other every step...
Stand against a wall and take ten steps, then put your feet together.
If your feet are a foot long, and you're footsteps are two feet apart, how far have you travelled?
ETA boundary conditions.

Edited by Super Sonic on Saturday 7th September 22:34
If you're standing still and your feet are a foot long, how far have you travelled?

Scabutz

8,158 posts

87 months

Saturday 7th September
quotequote all
wibble cb said:
I'm 6ft 5, my wife can't keep up with me when walking ( she is 5ft 1)......I find most people can't keep up with me!
I'm the same height, my ex wide was 5'6" but was a fast walker. I couldn't always keep up, but she would take 2 or 3 steps for my one. Used to boast how her step count was higher, yeah but we covered the same fking distance

Super Sonic

7,239 posts

61 months

Saturday 7th September
quotequote all
thegreenhell said:
If you're standing still and your feet are a foot long, how far have you travelled?
If you're standing still you're not travelling, so not relevant.
If your feet are a foot long, and you put one foot heel to toe in front of the other, then bring the other foot next to it, how far? 1'
Do it again. How far now? 2'
Three times? 3'
Ten times? 10'
Now do similar, but instead of putting your feet heel to toe, leave a 1' gap between them. You have traveled 1' farther than if you had 'heel & toed' as per the first instance. Therefore you have travelled 2'.
Do it twice, and you travel 4' (2×2=4)
Ten times, 2×10=20'
Comparing standing still to walking and wondering which causes you to travel farther? Shouldn't need maths to explain it!

cheesejunkie

3,511 posts

24 months

Saturday 7th September
quotequote all
Two friends in a Canadian winter.

One 6’5” the other about 5’4”. Tall one walks first.
Shiort one jumps into his footprints. Two work colleagues, not made up. I laughed when I heard it.

I’m somewhere in between on height. My walking pace is faster than mosts including the lanky lad. It might correlate with height but only roughly.

ETA, I'm convinced people from properly hot countries walk more slowly regardless of height.

Edited by cheesejunkie on Sunday 8th September 00:19