The Moon Mission
Discussion
Have we had the wool pulled over our eyes?
I had a good chat with a very accomplished physicist- and extremely wealthy guy because of.
He’d been working out, you actually need to know GPS on the moon.
You can kinda of work out vertical speed. But horizontal - no chance.
Phones back then were like of cogs and ratchets. Nothing like the tech available now.
Nothing has been out of near earth orbit for decades.
Actually nothing has been that far ever!
To go that far ? I’m sorry.
The wisdom of Pistonheads.
Convince me.
I had a good chat with a very accomplished physicist- and extremely wealthy guy because of.
He’d been working out, you actually need to know GPS on the moon.
You can kinda of work out vertical speed. But horizontal - no chance.
Phones back then were like of cogs and ratchets. Nothing like the tech available now.
Nothing has been out of near earth orbit for decades.
Actually nothing has been that far ever!
To go that far ? I’m sorry.
The wisdom of Pistonheads.
Convince me.
Jim H said:
Have we had the wool pulled over our eyes?
I had a good chat with a very accomplished physicist- and extremely wealthy guy because of.
He’d been working out, you actually need to know GPS on the moon.
You can kinda of work out vertical speed. But horizontal - no chance.
Phones back then were like of cogs and ratchets. Nothing like the tech available now.
Nothing has been out of near earth orbit for decades.
Actually nothing has been that far ever!
To go that far ? I’m sorry.
The wisdom of Pistonheads.
Convince me.
What a ridiculous post. Nothings been out of near-earth orbit for decades?I had a good chat with a very accomplished physicist- and extremely wealthy guy because of.
He’d been working out, you actually need to know GPS on the moon.
You can kinda of work out vertical speed. But horizontal - no chance.
Phones back then were like of cogs and ratchets. Nothing like the tech available now.
Nothing has been out of near earth orbit for decades.
Actually nothing has been that far ever!
To go that far ? I’m sorry.
The wisdom of Pistonheads.
Convince me.
Why not spend 1 minute googling like I did.
1st result, Wikipedia -
List of solar system probes: hundreds in the last 30 years
Missions to Mars: there’ve been 20 mars orbiters or landers in the last 30 years.
What about the space telescopes? Hubble and James Webb telescopes.
In 1969 there was no GPS on earth either.
People got about just fine.
I’d ask your friend what else he has ‘worked out for himself’?
Chemtrails?
Jet fuel doesn’t melt steel beams?
Jews run the earth on behalf of the Lizard people?
Seriously moon landing denial is crack-pot territory & I use it as a divining rod for people I don’t need in my life.
https://conspiracychart.com/
People got about just fine.
I’d ask your friend what else he has ‘worked out for himself’?
Chemtrails?
Jet fuel doesn’t melt steel beams?
Jews run the earth on behalf of the Lizard people?
Seriously moon landing denial is crack-pot territory & I use it as a divining rod for people I don’t need in my life.
https://conspiracychart.com/
My ex had a PhD in Quantum Physics with a specialism in 2D materials, but also a lot of time spent in astrophysics. I used to pose questions like this regularly to wind her up. Everytime she would fill about 3 pages with numbers and equations to prove me wrong. Methinks your friend is pulling your leg, or he's had a bump to the head.
hidetheelephants said:
Stick Legs said:
In 1969 there was no GPS on earth either.
People got about just fine.
That. Between a lot of clever maths, inertial navigation systems and astro nav they coped well enough to get there and back without missing at either end.People got about just fine.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Apollo_Guidance_Comp...
Jim H said:
Have we had the wool pulled over our eyes?
I had a good chat with a very accomplished physicist- and extremely wealthy guy because of.
He’d been working out, you actually need to know GPS on the moon.
You can kinda of work out vertical speed. But horizontal - no chance.
Phones back then were like of cogs and ratchets. Nothing like the tech available now.
Nothing has been out of near earth orbit for decades.
Actually nothing has been that far ever!
To go that far ? I’m sorry.
The wisdom of Pistonheads.
Convince me.
I had a good chat with a very accomplished physicist- and extremely wealthy guy because of.
He’d been working out, you actually need to know GPS on the moon.
You can kinda of work out vertical speed. But horizontal - no chance.
Phones back then were like of cogs and ratchets. Nothing like the tech available now.
Nothing has been out of near earth orbit for decades.
Actually nothing has been that far ever!
To go that far ? I’m sorry.
The wisdom of Pistonheads.
Convince me.
TeaNoSugar said:
Jim H said:
Have we had the wool pulled over our eyes?
I had a good chat with a very accomplished physicist- and extremely wealthy guy because of.
He’d been working out, you actually need to know GPS on the moon.
You can kinda of work out vertical speed. But horizontal - no chance.
Phones back then were like of cogs and ratchets. Nothing like the tech available now.
Nothing has been out of near earth orbit for decades.
Actually nothing has been that far ever!
To go that far ? I’m sorry.
The wisdom of Pistonheads.
Convince me.
What a ridiculous post. Nothings been out of near-earth orbit for decades?I had a good chat with a very accomplished physicist- and extremely wealthy guy because of.
He’d been working out, you actually need to know GPS on the moon.
You can kinda of work out vertical speed. But horizontal - no chance.
Phones back then were like of cogs and ratchets. Nothing like the tech available now.
Nothing has been out of near earth orbit for decades.
Actually nothing has been that far ever!
To go that far ? I’m sorry.
The wisdom of Pistonheads.
Convince me.
Why not spend 1 minute googling like I did.
1st result, Wikipedia -
List of solar system probes: hundreds in the last 30 years
Missions to Mars: there’ve been 20 mars orbiters or landers in the last 30 years.
What about the space telescopes? Hubble and James Webb telescopes.
I’m talking about actual Manned vehicles.
The Hubble repair was about at the limit of what was possible for the Shuttle.
RJO said:
hidetheelephants said:
Stick Legs said:
In 1969 there was no GPS on earth either.
People got about just fine.
That. Between a lot of clever maths, inertial navigation systems and astro nav they coped well enough to get there and back without missing at either end.People got about just fine.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Apollo_Guidance_Comp...
Edited by hidetheelephants on Saturday 1st June 05:28
Jim H said:
Have we had the wool pulled over our eyes?
Something only you can decide.Jim H said:
I had a good chat with a very accomplished physicist- and extremely wealthy guy because of.
You didn't, you made this upJim H said:
He’d been working out, you actually need to know GPS on the moon.
it's a documented fact that GPS was developed after the moon landing and nothing to do with lunar orbit then or sinceJim H said:
You can kinda of work out vertical speed. But horizontal - no chance.
FFSJim H said:
Phones back then were like of cogs and ratchets. Nothing like the tech available now
Nothing has been out of near earth orbit for decades.
Actually nothing has been that far ever!
To go that far ? I’m sorry.
The wisdom of Pistonheads.
Convince me.
.Nothing has been out of near earth orbit for decades.
Actually nothing has been that far ever!
To go that far ? I’m sorry.
The wisdom of Pistonheads.
Convince me.
Mercdriver said:
If the moon landing was faked I think the Russians would have been able to prove it and then use it to discredit the USA so for me it did happen.
Even if you can't get your head around the technology arguments, this is the most obvious proof that the missions were genuine. The Russians would have made mincemeat of the Americans if they thought for one moment there was any doubt about the missions.A common theme of conspiracy theories is that they posit something can’t be true because “too difficult or they point out something they think is inconsistent ” yet the alternative is normally much more difficult and riddled with inconsistencies. In this case the alternative is that the Americans managed to lie about the landings, fool the whole world, keep it secret despite hundreds of thousands being involved in the project and keep it secret forever. Really? Beggars belief. But then that is common with most such theories. Currently around 50% of voters in the US believe that Trump is suitable to be the president again (despite Trump being Trump and his record). It seems that a significant number of people lack any semblance of critical faculties.
Gassing Station | Science! | Top of Page | What's New | My Stuff