The Moon Mission

Author
Discussion

Jim H

Original Poster:

1,137 posts

196 months

Friday 31st May
quotequote all
Have we had the wool pulled over our eyes?

I had a good chat with a very accomplished physicist- and extremely wealthy guy because of.

He’d been working out, you actually need to know GPS on the moon.

You can kinda of work out vertical speed. But horizontal - no chance.



Phones back then were like of cogs and ratchets. Nothing like the tech available now.

Nothing has been out of near earth orbit for decades.

Actually nothing has been that far ever!

To go that far ? I’m sorry.

The wisdom of Pistonheads.

Convince me.


Error_404_Username_not_found

2,749 posts

58 months

Friday 31st May
quotequote all
Are you okay?
Try mathematics. It worked all right in 1969. Probably still does.
HTH.

Nigel_O

3,057 posts

226 months

Saturday 1st June
quotequote all
Jim H said:
Nothing has been out of near earth orbit for decades.
Apart from the half-dozen or so trips to Mars in the last ten or eleven years you mean?

Amazing what Google and a bit of Ingenuity can tell you…

TeaNoSugar

1,311 posts

172 months

Saturday 1st June
quotequote all
Jim H said:
Have we had the wool pulled over our eyes?

I had a good chat with a very accomplished physicist- and extremely wealthy guy because of.

He’d been working out, you actually need to know GPS on the moon.

You can kinda of work out vertical speed. But horizontal - no chance.



Phones back then were like of cogs and ratchets. Nothing like the tech available now.

Nothing has been out of near earth orbit for decades.

Actually nothing has been that far ever!

To go that far ? I’m sorry.

The wisdom of Pistonheads.

Convince me.
What a ridiculous post. Nothings been out of near-earth orbit for decades?

Why not spend 1 minute googling like I did.

1st result, Wikipedia -
List of solar system probes: hundreds in the last 30 years
Missions to Mars: there’ve been 20 mars orbiters or landers in the last 30 years.
What about the space telescopes? Hubble and James Webb telescopes.



Stick Legs

5,932 posts

172 months

Saturday 1st June
quotequote all
In 1969 there was no GPS on earth either.

People got about just fine.

I’d ask your friend what else he has ‘worked out for himself’?

Chemtrails?
Jet fuel doesn’t melt steel beams?
Jews run the earth on behalf of the Lizard people?

Seriously moon landing denial is crack-pot territory & I use it as a divining rod for people I don’t need in my life.


https://conspiracychart.com/

Jonmx

2,663 posts

220 months

Saturday 1st June
quotequote all
My ex had a PhD in Quantum Physics with a specialism in 2D materials, but also a lot of time spent in astrophysics. I used to pose questions like this regularly to wind her up. Everytime she would fill about 3 pages with numbers and equations to prove me wrong. Methinks your friend is pulling your leg, or he's had a bump to the head.

Mercdriver

2,634 posts

40 months

Saturday 1st June
quotequote all
If the moon landing was faked I think the Russians would have been able to prove it and then use it to discredit the USA so for me it did happen.

hidetheelephants

27,824 posts

200 months

Saturday 1st June
quotequote all
Stick Legs said:
In 1969 there was no GPS on earth either.

People got about just fine.
That. Between a lot of clever maths, inertial navigation systems and astro nav they coped well enough to get there and back without missing at either end.

RJO

712 posts

278 months

Saturday 1st June
quotequote all
hidetheelephants said:
Stick Legs said:
In 1969 there was no GPS on earth either.

People got about just fine.
That. Between a lot of clever maths, inertial navigation systems and astro nav they coped well enough to get there and back without missing at either end.
But they did have a computer to help.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Apollo_Guidance_Comp...

Fast and Spurious

1,563 posts

95 months

Saturday 1st June
quotequote all
Jim H said:
Have we had the wool pulled over our eyes?

I had a good chat with a very accomplished physicist- and extremely wealthy guy because of.

He’d been working out, you actually need to know GPS on the moon.

You can kinda of work out vertical speed. But horizontal - no chance.



Phones back then were like of cogs and ratchets. Nothing like the tech available now.

Nothing has been out of near earth orbit for decades.

Actually nothing has been that far ever!

To go that far ? I’m sorry.

The wisdom of Pistonheads.

Convince me.

Jim H

Original Poster:

1,137 posts

196 months

Saturday 1st June
quotequote all
TeaNoSugar said:
Jim H said:
Have we had the wool pulled over our eyes?

I had a good chat with a very accomplished physicist- and extremely wealthy guy because of.

He’d been working out, you actually need to know GPS on the moon.

You can kinda of work out vertical speed. But horizontal - no chance.



Phones back then were like of cogs and ratchets. Nothing like the tech available now.

Nothing has been out of near earth orbit for decades.

Actually nothing has been that far ever!

To go that far ? I’m sorry.

The wisdom of Pistonheads.

Convince me.
What a ridiculous post. Nothings been out of near-earth orbit for decades?

Why not spend 1 minute googling like I did.

1st result, Wikipedia -
List of solar system probes: hundreds in the last 30 years
Missions to Mars: there’ve been 20 mars orbiters or landers in the last 30 years.
What about the space telescopes? Hubble and James Webb telescopes.
Steady on chap.

I’m talking about actual Manned vehicles.

The Hubble repair was about at the limit of what was possible for the Shuttle.


Leithen

12,117 posts

274 months

Saturday 1st June
quotequote all
Next time you see your friend tell him that he had you for a while, before you figured out that GPS is a complete lie because of course the earth is flat.

silly

hidetheelephants

27,824 posts

200 months

Saturday 1st June
quotequote all
RJO said:
hidetheelephants said:
Stick Legs said:
In 1969 there was no GPS on earth either.

People got about just fine.
That. Between a lot of clever maths, inertial navigation systems and astro nav they coped well enough to get there and back without missing at either end.
But they did have a computer to help.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Apollo_Guidance_Comp...
yes It's the brains of the inertial navigation system.



Edited by hidetheelephants on Saturday 1st June 05:28

OzzyR1

5,920 posts

239 months

Saturday 1st June
quotequote all
Jim H said:
Have we had the wool pulled over our eyes?
Something only you can decide.

Jim H said:
I had a good chat with a very accomplished physicist- and extremely wealthy guy because of.
You didn't, you made this up

Jim H said:
He’d been working out, you actually need to know GPS on the moon.
it's a documented fact that GPS was developed after the moon landing and nothing to do with lunar orbit then or since

Jim H said:
You can kinda of work out vertical speed. But horizontal - no chance.
FFS

Jim H said:
Phones back then were like of cogs and ratchets. Nothing like the tech available now
Nothing has been out of near earth orbit for decades.
Actually nothing has been that far ever!
To go that far ? I’m sorry.
The wisdom of Pistonheads.
Convince me.
.
Jesus.

CanAm

10,056 posts

279 months

Saturday 1st June
quotequote all
Mercdriver said:
If the moon landing was faked I think the Russians would have been able to prove it and then use it to discredit the USA so for me it did happen.
Even if you can't get your head around the technology arguments, this is the most obvious proof that the missions were genuine. The Russians would have made mincemeat of the Americans if they thought for one moment there was any doubt about the missions.

croyde

23,928 posts

237 months

Saturday 1st June
quotequote all
Fast and Spurious said:
There.........are.........FOUR........lights!

OoopsVoss

601 posts

17 months

Saturday 1st June
quotequote all
Posted at 23:40 on a Friday night......


Gary C

13,171 posts

186 months

Saturday 1st June
quotequote all
Op

What are you on about, were you drinking ?

Cant really work out your point.

MikeM6

5,225 posts

109 months

Saturday 1st June
quotequote all
I think the bigger question is not whether this happened or not, as there is no credible doubt, but rather why do some feel so strongly that they need to disprove it? Is it simply a mistrustful nature combined with a wild imagination?

Skeptisk

8,241 posts

116 months

Saturday 1st June
quotequote all
A common theme of conspiracy theories is that they posit something can’t be true because “too difficult or they point out something they think is inconsistent ” yet the alternative is normally much more difficult and riddled with inconsistencies. In this case the alternative is that the Americans managed to lie about the landings, fool the whole world, keep it secret despite hundreds of thousands being involved in the project and keep it secret forever. Really? Beggars belief. But then that is common with most such theories. Currently around 50% of voters in the US believe that Trump is suitable to be the president again (despite Trump being Trump and his record). It seems that a significant number of people lack any semblance of critical faculties.