Radioactive source lost and found in Australia

Radioactive source lost and found in Australia

Author
Discussion

llewop

Original Poster:

3,651 posts

217 months

Wednesday 1st February 2023
quotequote all
https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-australia-6448327...

Quotes in the article:

a "victory for science"

"It's a regulatory failure, but I think the way they found it is really cool."

We were talking about this at work as very much an 'oops' before they found it - but good to see that the technology can do its thing....

Authorities said search crews had "quite literally found the needle in the haystack".

Simpo Two

86,730 posts

271 months

Wednesday 1st February 2023
quotequote all
llewop said:
Authorities said search crews had "quite literally found the needle in the haystack".
No they didn't, they found a radioactive pellet in a desert.

What surprised me is how such a thing could have fallen off the lorry in the first place.

llewop

Original Poster:

3,651 posts

217 months

Wednesday 1st February 2023
quotequote all
Simpo Two said:
llewop said:
Authorities said search crews had "quite literally found the needle in the haystack".
No they didn't, they found a radioactive pellet in a desert.

What surprised me is how such a thing could have fallen off the lorry in the first place.
yeah, but it is one of the stock phrases for improbable finding of something!


That is what was what we were thinking too; suspect it wasn't being secured as it should have been. Could have been a bit of lazy practice assuming 'it's bolted down, will be fine'.... then bounce it along a rough road, something they have probably got away with for years.

Evanivitch

21,628 posts

128 months

Wednesday 1st February 2023
quotequote all
Simpo Two said:
llewop said:
Authorities said search crews had "quite literally found the needle in the haystack".
No they didn't, they found a radioactive pellet in a desert.

What surprised me is how such a thing could have fallen off the lorry in the first place.
Next to the road it was known to be lost on...

deggles

638 posts

208 months

Wednesday 1st February 2023
quotequote all
I love the quote from the professor, incredulous they've come to him to comment on the bleedin' obvious

science dude said:
"You know it emits gamma radiation so the obvious thing is to comb the side of the road looking for something with a strong gamma signal... and sure enough that's exactly where they found it."

hidetheelephants

27,365 posts

199 months

Wednesday 1st February 2023
quotequote all
Bright gamma source found against non-radioactive backdrop.

Next week; the team have to search for a lighthouse, at night! hehe

llewop

Original Poster:

3,651 posts

217 months

Wednesday 1st February 2023
quotequote all
hidetheelephants said:
Bright gamma source found against non-radioactive backdrop.

Next week; the team have to search for a lighthouse, at night! hehe
To be fair, the road was getting on for 900 miles and they apparently detected it going along at about 30 mph.

Sheetmaself

5,775 posts

204 months

Thursday 2nd February 2023
quotequote all
I’m not stupid enough to argue with an expert.

Why wasn’t it as simple as turning on a good/strong/sensitive (delete as appropriate) Geiger counter and driving down the road. If it starts clicking get out and wave it about a bit?

Seems like it’s along the lines of finding a temple in Zelda.

llewop

Original Poster:

3,651 posts

217 months

Thursday 2nd February 2023
quotequote all
Sheetmaself said:
I’m not stupid enough to argue with an expert.

Why wasn’t it as simple as turning on a good/strong/sensitive (delete as appropriate) Geiger counter and driving down the road. If it starts clicking get out and wave it about a bit?

Seems like it’s along the lines of finding a temple in Zelda.
Sensitive is probably the most significant of those, although portable/robust starts to contradict that. Then working out how slow you need to be to be confident you'll get some clicks (or whatever - the one currently in my office kind of growls when it starts to detect something). They were lucky it stayed fairly close to the road, could have bounced further off the path and you'd miss it if you were not giving the detector a chance to see it.

There was also the possibility that another vehicle might have picked it up in the tyre tread or an animal/bird taken it and then could have gone anywhere.

troc

3,849 posts

181 months

Thursday 2nd February 2023
quotequote all
Finding it - as long as it was near the route taken was never really that hard, Ad had been said, it’s a strong radioactive source over a fairly uniform background.

The worry was that it would be picked up by someone or something and then it would be difficult to trace.

As to how it was lost, from what I gather a bolt fell out of the box it had been secured in and it fell out the hole……..

Bill

53,927 posts

261 months

Thursday 2nd February 2023
quotequote all
hidetheelephants said:
Bright gamma source found against non-radioactive backdrop.
yes They got lucky in the first pass. Presumably after that it would be a case of combing each side at ever decreasing speed.

jeremyc

24,337 posts

290 months

Thursday 2nd February 2023
quotequote all
Bill said:
hidetheelephants said:
Bright gamma source found against non-radioactive backdrop.
yes They got lucky in the first pass. Presumably after that it would be a case of combing each side at ever decreasing speed.
You would hope they might have done some testing first with another pellet to determine how easy it was to detect, and at what speed/distance. smile

Bill

53,927 posts

261 months

Thursday 2nd February 2023
quotequote all
Fair point. Plus slowing over storm drains and other places it may have bounced further.

Simpo Two

86,730 posts

271 months

Thursday 2nd February 2023
quotequote all
llewop said:
Then working out how slow you need to be to be confident you'll get some clicks...
I'd have put an identical pellet by a roadside and then done drive-by tests to determine a suitable speed for detection. Maybe they did.

It's really a radioactive version of metal-detecting.

Fundoreen

4,180 posts

89 months

Friday 3rd February 2023
quotequote all
The only bit of this story that was interesting was how it got lost and thats the only bit idiot news channel's never asked.

Simpo Two

86,730 posts

271 months

Friday 3rd February 2023
quotequote all
Fundoreen said:
The only bit of this story that was interesting was how it got lost and thats the only bit idiot news channel's never asked.
Then again, had a Conservative MP dropped it, it would fill the news 24 hours a day for a week. Cabinet member - three weeks.

ColinGreaves

72 posts

20 months

Wednesday 8th February 2023
quotequote all
I guess they had a few things working in their favour such as only one road, the truck had GPS, the ground is quite hard and devoid of much vegetation etc but on the other hand they managed to detect it over a large area at speed.

It would make a good documentary when the full story is finally known, including how the "escape" happened in the first place.

otolith

58,400 posts

210 months

Wednesday 8th February 2023
quotequote all
Bill said:
Fair point. Plus slowing over storm drains and other places it may have bounced further.
Looking at Highway 95 on Google Maps, it just looks like miles and miles of plain tarmac and nothing else!

Sheetmaself

5,775 posts

204 months

Wednesday 8th February 2023
quotequote all
llewop said:
Sheetmaself said:
I’m not stupid enough to argue with an expert.

Why wasn’t it as simple as turning on a good/strong/sensitive (delete as appropriate) Geiger counter and driving down the road. If it starts clicking get out and wave it about a bit?

Seems like it’s along the lines of finding a temple in Zelda.
Sensitive is probably the most significant of those, although portable/robust starts to contradict that. Then working out how slow you need to be to be confident you'll get some clicks (or whatever - the one currently in my office kind of growls when it starts to detect something). They were lucky it stayed fairly close to the road, could have bounced further off the path and you'd miss it if you were not giving the detector a chance to see it.

There was also the possibility that another vehicle might have picked it up in the tyre tread or an animal/bird taken it and then could have gone anywhere.
Sorry missed this, thanks for the explanation makes sense. To be honest I thought it to be a lot simpler than it appears.