Unblocking the Suez Canal

Unblocking the Suez Canal

Author
Discussion

GliderRider

Original Poster:

2,527 posts

88 months

Friday 26th March 2021
quotequote all
With the Suez Canal currently blocked by the Evergreen Evergiven container ship, a thought occurred to me. If the density of the water in the vicinity of the ship could be increased, e.g. by adding salt to Dead Sea concentrations or greater, could the ship be floated off?

If a coffer dams of, say, thin polythene sheet were used to contain the high-salt concentration water around the ship within the greater body of the canal water, what would happen, levels and pressure-wise?

I appreciate that the amount of salt and polythene required would be vast, so I'm not too concerned about the practical considerations.

sherman

13,834 posts

222 months

Friday 26th March 2021
quotequote all
Apart from the aquatic life genocide you are proposing its not a problem to float it. Its alrwady floating. Its wedged on the bank/canal bed. The need to break the suction and friction holding the boat in place.
Once they dig out enough of the bank to make a winding hole it will be freed by the tugs.

EliseNick

271 posts

188 months

Friday 26th March 2021
quotequote all
I like your thinking! Her draught is 14.5 m. Saturated salt solution has a density of 1.2 g/cm^3 - 20% more than pure water. Sea water (which presumably is what is in the Suez now) is not much more dense than pure water, at 1.025 g/nm^2 In either case, the ship must displace the same mass of water per unit length.



where rho is density. Let's assume that under the water she's basically a triangle of length equal to her draft d_o pointing down, with some width w_o at her (conventional) waterline. Now, by similar triangles,



Now we can proceed to rearrange things.



And by plugging in nembers for densities and her 'normal' draught we find that her new draught is 13.4 m - a lift of over a metre!

A small additional effect could be achieved by cooling the water around her to 4 C. But in this case the change in density is only around 0.1%


Edited by EliseNick on Friday 26th March 03:25


Edited by EliseNick on Friday 26th March 03:25

CraigyMc

17,111 posts

243 months

Friday 26th March 2021
quotequote all
GliderRider said:
With the Suez Canal currently blocked by the Evergreen Evergiven container ship, a thought occurred to me. If the density of the water in the vicinity of the ship could be increased, e.g. by adding salt to Dead Sea concentrations or greater, could the ship be floated off?

If a coffer dams of, say, thin polythene sheet were used to contain the high-salt concentration water around the ship within the greater body of the canal water, what would happen, levels and pressure-wise?

I appreciate that the amount of salt and polythene required would be vast, so I'm not too concerned about the practical considerations.
If you could separate the two different levels of salt water (inside the coffer dam, and outside in the remainder of the canal), there would be a pretty enormous pressure imbalance between the two because of the density difference. Polythene wouldn't do it.

If you could build a coffer dam on each side of the ship and raise the level of the water where the ship is, you could refloat it pretty quickly. The problem, of course, is that building coffer dams isn't that fast unless you have everything to hand.

DocJock

8,483 posts

247 months

Friday 26th March 2021
quotequote all
It's ok, 'Dave' is on the job...



He'd be finished already but he's waiting on more skips.

xeny

4,669 posts

85 months

Friday 26th March 2021
quotequote all
Looking at the photo, it looks as if the ship has bow thrusters, which you'd hope would make this kind of incident rather less likely. The report will make interesting reading.

anonymous-user

61 months

Friday 26th March 2021
quotequote all
The "ship stuck in the canal" problem is actually very similar to the "we don't have enough ventilators" problem from last year!

Ie, the issue is the time period available and not the actual technical solution! This means the "best" solution is simply the one you can arrange to carry out in the shortest possible time.........

tertius

6,914 posts

237 months

Friday 26th March 2021
quotequote all
sherman said:
Apart from the aquatic life genocide you are proposing its not a problem to float it. Its alrwady floating. Its wedged on the bank/canal bed. The need to break the suction and friction holding the boat in place.
Once they dig out enough of the bank to make a winding hole it will be freed by the tugs.
I should say based on the chart posted in the other thread they’ll need to dig out a lot more than a winding hole - looks as though about a quarter to a third of the ship is aground.

CraigyMc

17,111 posts

243 months

Friday 26th March 2021
quotequote all
Don't mean to go all tinfoil hat but surely there's more than one backhoe in Egypt?

Scrump

22,939 posts

165 months

Friday 26th March 2021
quotequote all
EliseNick said:
I like your thinking! Her draught is 14.5 m. Saturated salt solution has a density of 1.2 g/cm^3 - 20% more than pure water. Sea water (which presumably is what is in the Suez now) is not much more dense than pure water, at 1.025 g/nm^2 In either case, the ship must displace the same mass of water per unit length.



where rho is density. Let's assume that under the water she's basically a triangle of length equal to her draft d_o pointing down, with some width w_o at her (conventional) waterline. Now, by similar triangles,



Now we can proceed to rearrange things.



And by plugging in nembers for densities and her 'normal' draught we find that her new draught is 13.4 m - a lift of over a metre!

A small additional effect could be achieved by cooling the water around her to 4 C. But in this case the change in density is only around 0.1%


Edited by EliseNick on Friday 26th March 03:25


Edited by EliseNick on Friday 26th March 03:25
thumbup The underwater hull shape is closer to a rectangle than a triangle though.
Typical midship section below which would continue over the majority the length .

condor

8,837 posts

255 months

Friday 26th March 2021
quotequote all
Why don't they remove some of the containers to lighten the load?

tertius

6,914 posts

237 months

Friday 26th March 2021
quotequote all
condor said:
Why don't they remove some of the containers to lighten the load?
I am sure that will when they can but it’s not easy.

They will need massive cranes to unload them and they have to be removed in careful sequence so as not to unbalance the ship.

Matt_E_Mulsion

1,713 posts

72 months

Friday 26th March 2021
quotequote all
condor said:
Why don't they remove some of the containers to lighten the load?
With what and onto what? I can't imagine it's that easy with the ship being positioned where it is and how it is.

The Rotrex Kid

31,671 posts

167 months

Friday 26th March 2021
quotequote all
Matt_E_Mulsion said:
condor said:
Why don't they remove some of the containers to lighten the load?
With what and onto what? I can't imagine it's that easy with the ship being positioned where it is and how it is.
There was talk that it would make the ship uneven and could capsize IIRC.

condor

8,837 posts

255 months

Friday 26th March 2021
quotequote all
Could they jettison the rear top layer of containers into the water and then collect them and remove them to the side of the canal. They should be the lightest containers as they are on the top smile

GliderRider

Original Poster:

2,527 posts

88 months

Friday 26th March 2021
quotequote all
EliseNick, thank you for doing the maths. That's a fair bit of research and number crunching you did for me. I'm sure those trying to unstick the ship would be very grateful for a metre less draught right now.

CraigyMc, with a 20% difference in density, that highly saline water would be doing its best to do an inverted mushroom cloud through the normal seawater, so yes, a sheet of polythene wouldn't be likely to withstand the forces involved.

Edited by GliderRider on Friday 26th March 19:59

FourWheelDrift

89,634 posts

291 months

Friday 26th March 2021
quotequote all
What about pumping more water into the land under the ship and vibrating it to create soil liquefaction then pull the ship around back into the main channel?

GliderRider

Original Poster:

2,527 posts

88 months

Friday 26th March 2021
quotequote all
Matt_E_Mulsion said:
condor said:
Why don't they remove some of the containers to lighten the load?
With what and onto what? I can't imagine it's that easy with the ship being positioned where it is and how it is.
A Mil-26 helicopter may be able to lift 40ft containers one at a time, and it would then be able to put them down on the nearest firm ground. A Chinook could manage 20 foot containers. With the vessel's capacity equivalent to over 20,000 20ft containers, it wouldn't be a five minute job even if they get this guy on it:

Helicopter harvesting Christmas trees

Fundoreen

4,180 posts

90 months

Friday 26th March 2021
quotequote all
Im available if they want to know about my idea for a bubble making machine.

Sheets Tabuer

19,645 posts

222 months

Friday 26th March 2021
quotequote all
Fill the ballast tanks with helium.